Cephalometric soft tissue profile analysis between two different ethnic groups: a comparative study.

The aim of this investigation was to study and compare the cephalometric soft tissue profile analysis between Saudis and Caucasian Americans. The study was carried out using standardized cephalometric radiographs of 56 Saudi subjects (30 males and 26 females) with pleasant and balanced facial profiles, competent lips, normal overjet and overbite, and showing no craniofacial deformities. Subject ages ranged from 22 to 23 years. One skeletal and thirteen soft tissue variables were investigated. F-test, two samples t-test, Mann-Whitney, and Wilcoxon tests were used for data analysis. The results showed no statistical significant differences between the Saudi males and females except for the angle of total facial convexity, soft tissue facial plane angle, lower lip length, sagittal nasal tip to the most protrusive lip distance, and also sagittal chin to the most protrusive lip distance. The Saudi females had a greater angle of total facial convexity and soft tissue facial plane angle than the males. In addition, the females had a shorter lower lip. They also had a short distance between the nasal tip and chin to the most protrusive lip. These results reveal significant differences in most of the soft tissue variables when comparing Saudis with Caucasian Americans as well as in other ethnic groups. Most of these variables are essential for the diagnosis and treatment planning of cases requiring orthodontics and orthognathic surgery.

[1]  S. Wolfe Dentofacial Deformities. Integrated Orthodontic and Surgical Correction , 1987 .

[2]  R G Thomas,et al.  An evaluation of the soft-tissue facial profile in the North American black woman. , 1979, American journal of orthodontics.

[3]  S. Bishara,et al.  Longitudinal soft-tissue profile changes: a study of three analyses. , 1985, American journal of orthodontics.

[4]  R. Thurow Atlas of orthodontic principles , 1970 .

[5]  H. Shaikh,et al.  Adult Cephalometric Norms for Saudi Arabians with a Comparison of Values for Saudi and North American Caucasians , 1987, British journal of orthodontics.

[6]  A. Valiathan,et al.  Soft tissue cephalometric analysis of adults from Kerala. , 1984, Journal of the Indian Dental Association.

[7]  T. Flynn,et al.  Cephalometric norms for orthognathic surgery in black American adults. , 1989, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[8]  R A Holdaway,et al.  A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part I. , 1983, American journal of orthodontics.

[9]  T. Matsumura,et al.  Soft tissue cephalometric norms in Japanese adults. , 2000, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[10]  R M Ricketts,et al.  Esthetics, environment, and the law of lip relation. , 1968, American journal of orthodontics.

[11]  S. Chaconas,et al.  Prediction of normal soft tissue facial changes. , 1975, The Angle orthodontist.

[12]  J. Marsh,et al.  Surgical diagnosis and treatment planning: a visual approach. , 1982, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[13]  S. Kapila,et al.  Analysis of soft tissue facial profile in white males. , 1992, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[14]  L. Walford,et al.  Statistical Methods for Medical and Biological Students , 1940, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[15]  Bryan A. Luna,et al.  Orthognathic surgery norms for American black patients , 1985 .

[16]  K K Lew,et al.  Soft-tissue cephalometric norms in Chinese adults with esthetic facial profiles. , 1992, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.