A noncalibrated rainfall‐runoff model for large, arid catchments

A distributed, field-based rainfall-runoff model was developed for the 1400-km2 arid catchment of Nahal Zin, Israel. No calibration with measured flow data was performed. The model used rainfall radar input applied over a catchment that was spatially disaggregated into different terrain types according to hydrologically relevant surface characteristics. Hortonian overland flow generation on each type was parameterized independently using values of initial loss and temporal decay of infiltration determined from existing field experiments. Delimited by topography, this catchment wide pattern of rainfall excess was distributed over 850 tributary catchments (model elements). Runoff delivery from the model elements to the adjoining channel segments was timed by applying a mean response function determined in an environmentally similar experimental catchment. Inside the channel network the MVPMC3 method of the Muskingum-Cunge technique was used for streamflow routing, accounting for channel dimensions and roughness. For each channel segment a constant infiltration rate was applied to account for transmission losses and discontinued when the wetting front reached the bottom of the available alluvial storage. Within two model tests, one separate for the routing component (October 1979) and one for the complete model (October 1991), observed hydrographs and reconstructed peak discharges were successfully simulated. The spatially distributed model output showed that during the October 1991 test, tributaries produced preceding peaks that wetted the channel alluvium before the main flood had arrived and transmission losses lost their significance downstream. Total maximum model uncertainty was estimated including the uncertainty ranges of each model parameter. In general, this study shows that field-based data on generation and losses of runoff may be incorporated into a distributed hydrologic model to overcome calibration with the poor data records of arid high-magnitude events.

[1]  Thomas A. McMahon,et al.  Physically based hydrologic modeling: 1. A terrain‐based model for investigative purposes , 1992 .

[2]  D. Sharon,et al.  The distribution of rainfall intensity in Israel, its regional and seasonal variations and its climatological evaluation , 1986 .

[3]  A. Yair.  Runoff generation in a sandy area—the nizzana sands, Western Negev, Israel , 1990 .

[4]  H. Wheater,et al.  An integrated model of arid zone water resources: evaluation of rainfall-runo ff simulation performance , 1997 .

[5]  A. Yair,et al.  The influence of surface properties on flow and erosion processes on debris covered slopes in an arid area , 1973 .

[6]  Case study evaluation of geomorphologic rainfall - runoff model, incorporating linear infiltration expression , 1990 .

[7]  A. Schick,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF TWO TEN-YEAR SEDIMENT BUDGETS, NAHAL YAEL, ISRAEL , 1993 .

[8]  Victor R. Baker,et al.  A high magnitude storm and flood in a hyperarid catchment, Nahal Zin, Negev Desert, Israel , 1998 .

[9]  R. Amit,et al.  The evolution of holocene reg (gravelly) soils in deserts , 1986 .

[10]  J. A. Cunge,et al.  On The Subject Of A Flood Propagation Computation Method (Musklngum Method) , 1969 .

[11]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Performance of conceptual rainfall‐runoff models in low‐yielding ephemeral catchments , 1997 .

[12]  K. D. Sharma,et al.  DISTRIBUTED NUMERICAL RAINFALL–RUNOFF MODELLING IN AN ARID REGION USING THEMATIC MAPPER DATA AND A GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM , 1996 .

[13]  A. Yair.  The Control Of Headwater Area On Channel Runoff In A Small Arid Watershed , 1992 .

[14]  W. Bull.  Discontinuous ephemeral streams , 1997 .

[15]  C. Collier.  Weather Radar Precipitation Data And Their Use In Hydrological Modelling , 1990 .

[16]  C. Leibundgut,et al.  Using artificial tracers to study water losses of ephemeral floods in small arid streams , 1998 .

[17]  C. Leibundgut,et al.  Channel Infiltration study using dye tracers , 1995 .

[18]  R. Mein,et al.  Sensitivity of optimized parameters in watershed models , 1978 .

[19]  Keith Beven,et al.  The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. , 1992 .

[20]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Effect of rainfall‐sampling errors on simulations of desert flash floods , 1994 .

[21]  Denis A. Hughes,et al.  A semi-distributed, variable time interval model of catchment hydrology—structure and parameter estimation procedures , 1994 .

[22]  L. Shanan,et al.  A hydrological model for the Negev Desert Highlands: effects of infiltration, runoff and ancient agriculture / Modèle hydrologique pour les régions montagneuses du Negev: les effets d'infiltration, d'écoulement et de l'agriculture ancienne , 1980 .

[23]  Arnon Karnieli,et al.  CELMOD5 : a semi-distributed cell model for conversion of rainfall into runoff in semi-arid watersheds , 1994 .

[24]  A. Al-Turbak.  Geomorphoclimatic peak discharge model with a physically based infiltration component , 1996 .

[25]  D. A. Woolhiser,et al.  KINEROS - a kinematic runoff and erosion model , 1995 .

[26]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe,et al.  The geomorphologic structure of hydrologic response , 1979 .

[27]  D. Rosgen.  A classification of natural rivers , 1994 .

[28]  D. Goodrich,et al.  Linearity of basin response as a function of scale in a semiarid watershed , 1997 .

[29]  M. Nouh.  Flood hydrograph estimation from arid catchment morphology , 1990 .

[30]  R. Bryan,et al.  Runoff and erosion processes and rates in the Zin valley badlands, northern Negev, Israel , 1980 .

[31]  Chris G. Collier,et al.  Precipitation Measurement and Hydrology , 1990 .

[32]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Comparison of simple versus complex distributed runoff models on a midsized semiarid watershed , 1994 .

[33]  L. Lane.  Distributed Model for Small Semiarid Watersheds , 1982 .

[34]  R. D. Jarrett.  DETERMINATION OF ROUGHNESS COEFFICIENTS FOR STREAMS IN COLORADO , 1985 .

[35]  Victor Miguel Ponce,et al.  Variable-parameter Muskingum-Cunge method revisited , 1994 .