The Tight-Rope Technique versus Clavicular Hook Plate for Treatment of Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract Objective: The efficacy of the tight-rope (TR) technique and clavicular hook plate (CHP) for the treatment of acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation is controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate which method is more appropriate for the treatment of acute AC joint dislocation. Methods: We systematically searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, Chinese VIP Database, and Chinese Wan-Fang databases from inception to January 2018 using the search term “acromioclavicular joint dislocation AND hook plate.” All prospective and retrospective controlled trials that had compared functional scores, pain scores, reduction loss rates, coracoclavicular (CC) distances, and complications between TR and CHP for acute AC joint dislocation were identified. A total of 13 of 587 studies with 732 patients were included. TR was preferential to CHP for AC joint dislocation given its higher Constant–Murley score, lower Visual Analog Scale pain score, and comparable reduction loss rate and CC distance. Subgroup analyses of the surgical type of TR did not affect the outcome. Results: The TR technique appears to be associated with better functional recovery and less pain than CHP. In addition, it does not increase the risk of reduction loss, CC distance, or operation time. It is also not associated with other complications except the implant migration, and does not require removal of the internal fixation. Conclusions: Thus, our results indicated that for AC joint dislocation, the TR technique may be preferential.