Category test and trail making test as measures of frontal lobe functions

Abstract A brief review of the literature reveals that many psychologists believe that certain tests measure frontal lobe deficits. However, recent carefully controlled studies suggest that neuropsychological deficits are far from specific for frontal versus nonfrontal lesions. In this study, we compared groups with frontal and nonfrontal cerebral lesions that were approximately equivalent for types of lesions and other variables. No intergroup differences were found on the Category Test and Part B of the Trail Making Test. The results suggest that neuropsychologists should adopt a more critical attitude concerning so-called “frontal lobe deficits.”

[1]  A. Horton,et al.  Neuropsychological Evaluation of Older Children , 1995 .

[2]  Bruce L. Miller,et al.  Performance on frontal lobe tests in healthy, older individuals , 1990 .

[3]  Louis Costa Clinical neuropsychology: Prospects and problems , 1988 .

[4]  R. Goldman,et al.  Sensitivity of the Mini-Mental State Examination to frontal lobe dysfunction in normal aging. , 1992, Journal of clinical psychology.

[5]  R. Reitan The relation of the trail making test to organic brain damage. , 1955, Journal of consulting psychology.

[6]  R. Reitan,et al.  Relationships between specific and general tests of cerebral functioning , 1996 .

[7]  R. Reitan,et al.  Effect of lateralized cerebral damage upon contralateral and ipsilateral sensorimotor performances. , 1982, Journal of clinical neuropsychology.

[8]  E. Bigler Frontal lobe damage and neuropsychological assessment. , 1988, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[9]  R. Diamond,et al.  Frontal lobe functioning in boys with attention‐deficit hyperactivity disorder , 1992 .

[10]  R. Reitan Validity of the Trail Making Test as an Indicator of Organic Brain Damage , 1958 .

[11]  Recency discrimination deficits in frontal lobe patients , 1994 .

[12]  R. Reitan,et al.  Concept Attainment of Human Adults with Lateralized Cerebral Lesions , 1962 .

[13]  R. Heaton,et al.  Diagnostic utility of the Thurstone Word Fluency Test in neuropsychological evaluations. , 1982, Journal of clinical neuropsychology.

[14]  W. C. Halstead Brain and intelligence : a quantitative study of the frontal Lobes , 1948 .

[15]  B Jonas,et al.  Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Performance Based on Location and Size of Neuroanatomical Lesion in Vietnam Veterans with Penetrating Head Injury , 1990, Perceptual and motor skills.

[16]  Arthur L. Benton,et al.  Differential behavioral effects in frontal lobe disease , 1968 .

[17]  Bruce F. Pennington,et al.  A normative‐developmental study of executive function: A window on prefrontal function in children , 1991 .

[18]  R. Reitan,et al.  Neuropsychological correlates of rapidly vs. slowly growing intrinsic cerebral neoplasms. , 1984, Journal of clinical neuropsychology.

[19]  R. Reitan Investigation of the validity of Halstead's measures of biological intelligence. , 1955, A.M.A. archives of neurology and psychiatry.

[20]  D. O'Leary,et al.  Development of a behavior attributed to the frontal lobes and the relationship to other cognitive functions , 1990 .

[21]  H. Damasio,et al.  Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance as a measure of frontal lobe damage. , 1991, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[22]  D. Edgell,et al.  Learning Disabilities and Brain Function , 1993, Springer New York.

[23]  G. Shute,et al.  Developmental variability in frontal lobe function , 1990 .

[24]  R. Reitan,et al.  The Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery: Theory and clinical interpretation , 1993 .

[25]  R. Reitan Ward Halstead's contributions to neuropsychology and the Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery. , 1994, Journal of clinical psychology.