Visual attention and association: An electroencephalography study in expert designers

Extant research on the visual attention and association of designers is limited, and scientific evidence differentiating among the effects of diverse visual stimuli on design thinking is insufficient. The current study invited 12 healthy expert designers and analysed their experiences of visual attention and association in addition to exploring the differences caused by three types of pictorial representation. The results of this electroencephalography (EEG) experiment indicated that the frontoparietal region was particularly activated when the designers engaged in visual attention tasks, whereas the brainwaves were particularly activated in the distributed prefrontal, frontocentral, and parietooccipital regions during the visual association tasks. In addition, there were no significant differences in the brainwave energy resulting from the three types of pictorial representation applied in this study. The research outcomes linking design studies to cognitive neuroscience establish a concrete foundation for developing future applied research and diverse educational practices.

[1]  Influence of simple verbal and non-verbal stimuli on brain electrical activity. , 2009, Journal of integrative neuroscience.

[2]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Functional interactions between prefrontal and visual association cortex contribute to top-down modulation of visual processing. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  Yaser Merrikhi,et al.  Visual attention: Linking prefrontal sources to neuronal and behavioral correlates , 2015, Progress in Neurobiology.

[4]  Robin W. Wilkins,et al.  Creativity and the default network: A functional connectivity analysis of the creative brain at rest , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  Katharina N. Seidl-Rathkopf,et al.  Functions of the human frontoparietal attention network: Evidence from neuroimaging , 2015, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.

[6]  Dima Amso,et al.  The attentive brain: insights from developmental cognitive neuroscience , 2015, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[7]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Solving future problems: Default network and executive activity associated with goal-directed mental simulations , 2011, NeuroImage.

[8]  Vesna Popovic,et al.  Expertise development in product design-strategic and domain-specific knowledge connections , 2004 .

[9]  Petra Badke-Schaub,et al.  How do analogizing and mental simulation influence team dynamics in innovative product design? , 2015, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[10]  Jerry S. Busby,et al.  Practices in Design Concept Selection as Distributed Cognition , 2001, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[11]  M. Posner,et al.  Enhancing attention through training , 2015, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.

[12]  Ravi Dhar,et al.  Of Frog Wines and Frowning Watches: Semantic Priming, Perceptual Fluency, and Brand Evaluation , 2008 .

[13]  Shi-An Chen,et al.  Stimulating the imaginative capacities of agricultural extension students , 2016 .

[14]  Ellen F. Potter,et al.  Promoting Conceptual Understanding through Pictorial Representation , 2001 .

[15]  John S. Gero,et al.  Interpretation-driven Visual Association , 2011, ICCC.

[16]  Howard C. Tenenbaum,et al.  Enhanced Medial Prefrontal-Default Mode Network Functional Connectivity in Chronic Pain and Its Association with Pain Rumination , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  R. Engle,et al.  Executive Attention, Working Memory Capacity, and a Two-Factor Theory of Cognitive Control. , 2003 .

[18]  M. Hoffmann,et al.  The Human Frontal Lobes and Frontal Network Systems: An Evolutionary, Clinical, and Treatment Perspective , 2013, ISRN neurology.

[19]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[20]  Paul Hekkert,et al.  Source Selection in Product Metaphor Generation: The Effects of Salience and Relatedness , 2014 .

[21]  Chi-Cheng Chang,et al.  Predicting the creativity of design majors based on the interaction of diverse personality traits , 2015 .

[22]  Mathias Benedek,et al.  Intelligence in creative processes: An EEG study , 2015 .

[23]  J. Smallwood,et al.  Inspired by Distraction , 2012, Psychological science.

[24]  David W. Frank,et al.  The timing and directional connectivity of human frontoparietal and ventral visual attention networks in emotional scene perception , 2014, Neuroscience.

[25]  Gagan S Wig,et al.  Repetition-related reductions in neural activity reveal component processes of mental simulation. , 2014, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[26]  S. Tipper,et al.  Self-generated cognitive fluency as an alternative route to preference formation , 2013, Consciousness and Cognition.

[27]  M. Carrasco.  Visual attention: The past 25 years , 2011, Vision Research.

[28]  Tzyy-Ping Jung,et al.  Spatial and temporal EEG dynamics of motion sickness , 2010, NeuroImage.

[29]  A. Wagner,et al.  Prefrontal and hippocampal contributions to visual associative recognition: Interactions between cognitive control and episodic retrieval , 2004, Brain and Cognition.

[30]  A. Diamond,et al.  Interventions Shown to Aid Executive Function Development in Children 4 to 12 Years Old , 2011, Science.

[31]  Chaoyun Liang,et al.  The mediator effects of conceiving imagination on academic performance of design students , 2014 .

[32]  P. Dayan,et al.  Temporal structure in associative retrieval , 2015, eLife.

[33]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Motivation of extended behaviors by anterior cingulate cortex , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  D. Amso,et al.  Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: Evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  Variances in the impact of visual stimuli on design problem solving performance , 2006 .

[36]  Chun-Hsiang Chuang,et al.  An Inflatable and Wearable Wireless System for Making 32-Channel Electroencephalogram Measurements , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[37]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dysconnectivity in the Frontoparietal Attention Network in Schizophrenia , 2013, Front. Psychiatry.

[38]  D. Schacter,et al.  The Brain's Default Network , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Marcia Grabowecky,et al.  Visual Attention Modulates Insight Versus Analytic Solving of Verbal Problems , 2012, J. Probl. Solving.

[40]  Guido Hermans,et al.  Investigating the unexplored possibilities of digital-physical toolkits in lay design , 2014 .

[41]  R. Ptak.  The Frontoparietal Attention Network of the Human Brain , 2012, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[42]  G. Goldschmidt,et al.  Reasoning by Visual Analogy in Design Problem-Solving: The Role of Guidance , 2000 .

[43]  Ross A. Malaga.  The effect of stimulus modes and associative distance in individual creativity support systems , 2000, Decis. Support Syst..

[44]  Benoit Weil,et al.  Managing the impacts of non-verbal devices on idea generation: a new challenge for creative leaders , 2015 .

[45]  Peng Peng,et al.  Does attention training work? A selective meta-analysis to explore the effects of attention training and moderators , 2016 .

[46]  Irene Reppa,et al.  What makes icons appealing? The role of processing fluency in predicting icon appeal in different task contexts. , 2016, Applied ergonomics.

[47]  R. N. Spreng,et al.  The Future of Memory: Remembering, Imagining, and the Brain , 2012, Neuron.

[48]  Petra Badke-Schaub,et al.  The Influence of Different Pictorial Representations during Idea Generation. , 2011 .

[49]  Chuanji Gao,et al.  Processing fluency hinders subsequent recollection: an electrophysiological study , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[50]  M. van der Schoot,et al.  The developmental onset of symbolic approximation: beyond nonsymbolic representations, the language of numbers matters , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[51]  Wen-Ming Luh,et al.  Goal-Congruent Default Network Activity Facilitates Cognitive Control , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[52]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[53]  Meena Rangi Meena Rangi.  Distinguishing Cognitive Tasks Using Statistical Analysis Techniques , 2013 .

[54]  Jeffrey V. Nickerson,et al.  A fix for fixation? Rerepresenting and abstracting as creative processes in the design of information systems , 2010, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[55]  Julie S. Linsey,et al.  The effects of representation on idea generation and design fixation: A study comparing sketches and function trees , 2016 .

[56]  Rongjun Yu,et al.  From memory to prospection: what are the overlapping and the distinct components between remembering and imagining? , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[57]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  Ubiquitous Serendipity: Potential Visual Design Stimuli are Everywhere , 2015 .

[58]  D. Carley,et al.  Proof of Concept Trial of Dronabinol in Obstructive Sleep Apnea , 2013, Front. Psychiatry.

[59]  T. Klingberg.  Training and plasticity of working memory , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[60]  Nancy C. Andreasen,et al.  A Journey into Chaos: Creativity and the Unconscious** , 2011, Mens sana monographs.

[61]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Top-down influences on visual processing , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[62]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  The impact of binaural beats on creativity , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..