Evaluation of a tactile vocoder for work recognition.

Normal subjects learned to identify words through a tactile vocoder. The vocoder employed 16 filter channels, each with a bandwidth of 1/3 octave, with center frequencies ranging from 200-8000 Hz. The output of each filter was detected and after logarithmic amplification the resulting outputs were transmitted to a 16-channel solenoid array placed on the subject's ventromedial forearm. Words, spoken "live voice," were used as stimuli; the subject was able to feel both the vocalization of the reader and herself and, most importantly, extensive training was provided. In 40.5 h one subject learned 70 words and a second subject reached criterion on 150 words in the comparatively short time of 55 h. Words that were poorly identified initially were identified more readily with increased experience. Phonetic identification tests showed that the features of voicing, nasality, and frication were reliably recognized, indicating the tactile vocoder will be useful in providing information to complement lipreading. Finally, subjects learned rapidly to generalize word-learning to unfamiliar readers.

[1]  C M Reed,et al.  Research on tactile communication of speech: a review. , 1982, ASHA monographs.

[2]  J. Pickett,et al.  COMMUNICATION OF SPEECH SOUNDS BY A TACTUAL VOCODER. , 1963, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[3]  Robert H. Gault,et al.  Progress in experiments on tactual interpretation of oral speech. , 1924 .

[4]  R. W. Guelke,et al.  Development of Apparatus for the Analysis of Sound by the Sense of Touch , 1959 .

[5]  Siegfried Engelmann,et al.  Tactual Hearing Experiment with Deaf and Hearing Subjects , 1975 .

[6]  J H Kirman Tactile perception of computer-derived formant patterns from voiced speech. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  C. L. Searle,et al.  Stop consonant discrimination based on human audition. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  N. P. Erber,et al.  Visual perception of speech by deaf children: recent developments and continuing needs. , 1974, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[9]  M H Goldstein,et al.  Modification of vocalizations of preschool deaf children by vibrotactile and visual displays. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  W. M. Rabinowitz,et al.  Analytic study of the Tadoma method: background and preliminary results. , 1977, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[11]  P K Kuhl,et al.  Investigating the MESA (multipoint electrotactile speech aid): the transmission of connected discourse. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  G H Yeni-Komshian,et al.  Identification of speech sounds displayed on a vibrotactile vocoder. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  P. Denes On the Statistics of Spoken English , 1963 .

[14]  D K Oller,et al.  Tactual speech perception by minimally trained deaf subjects. , 1980, Journal of speech and hearing research.