Computed Medical Imaging

ofSensory aitd e'retlI Systems, R. Aslin, J. L. Alberts, M. R. Psen, Eds. (Academic Press, New York i4es. 27. M. A. Hofer, i Fiir, H. Shair, paper presented at the anna meeting of the International Society for Developmental Psychobiology, Atlanta, 1979. 28. E. S. E. Hafez, The Behaviour ofDomestic Animals (Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1975). 29. R. F. Ewer, Behaviour 15, 148 (1959); ibid. 17, 247 (1961); J. S. Rosenblatt, in The Biopsychology of Development, E. Tobach et al., Eds. (Academic Press, New York, 1971). 30. M. H. Klaus, M. A. Trause, J. H. Kennell, in Parent-Infant Interactions: Ciba Foundation Symposium 33 (Elsevier, New York, 1975), pp. 87-102. 31. J. A. MacFarlane, in ibid., pp. 103-118. 32. E. Peto, Br. J. Med. Psychol. 15, 314 (1936). 33. K. Jensen, Genet. Psychol. Monogr. 12, 361 (1932). 34. W. G. Hall, C. P. Cramer, E. M. Blass, Nature (London) 258, 318 (1975); J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 91, 1141 (1977). 35. C. P. Cramer, E. M. Blass, W. G. Hall, Dev. Psychobiol. 13, 165 (1980). 36. W. G. Hall and E. M. Blass, unpublished observations (1977). 37. W. G. Hall and J. S. Rosenblatt, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 91, 1232 (1977). 38. R. F. Drewett, C. Statham, J. B. Wakerley, Anim. Behav. 22, 907 (1974). 39. W. G. Hall and J. S. Rosenblatt, Behav. Biol. 24, 413 (1978). 40. The tongue-cannula technique under discussion allows us only to make statements about remaining attached to the nipple and receiving but not withdrawing milk. Thus, if suckling is defined as the act that causes withdrawal of milk from the nipple and the studies under discussion (35, 37, 39) are establishing classes of events, albeit nutritive, that lead to nipple release, then the Hall studies (35, 37, 39) have not addressed this mechanism. If suckling is more broadly defined in terms of mechanisms of attachment and responsiveness to milk injection into the back of the mouth, the place where milk is normally delivered, then the Hall studies do address the suckling mechanism. Ultimately, techniques will have to be developed to honor the more restrictive definition of suckling, that is, attachment to the nipple and the withdrawal of milk from the nipple. 41. G. P. Smith and J. Gibbs, in Progress in Psychobiology and Physiological Psychology, J. M. Sprague and A. N. Epstein, Eds. (Academic Press, New York, 1979), vol. 8, p. 180. 42. E. M. Blass, W. Beardsley, W. G. Hall, Am. J. Physiol. 236, E567 (1979). 43. J. S. Rosenblatt, in Growing Points in Ethology, P. P. G. Bateson and R. A. Hinde, Eds. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1976), p. 345. 44. E. F. Adolph, Am. J. Physiol. 161, 374 (1950). 45. J. P. Bruno, thesis, Johns Hopkins University (1979). 46. J. T. Fitzsimmons, Physiol. Rev. 52, 468 (1972); S. Hsaio and F. Trankina, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 69, 448 (1969). 47. R. F. Drewett, C. Statham, J. B. Wakerley, Anim. Behav. 22, 907 (1974); S. C. Brake, V. Wolfson, M. A. Hofer, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 93, 760 (1979). 48. C. L. Williams, J. S. Rosenblatt, W. G. Hall, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 94, 472 (1980). 49. J. T. Kenney, M. L. Stoloff, J. P. Bruno, E. M. Blass, ibid. 93, 752 (1979). 50. J. T. Kenny and E. M. Blass, Science 196, 898 (1977). 51. L. T. Martin and J. R. Alberts, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 93, 430 (1979). 52. E. M. Blass, M. H. Teicher, W. G. Hall, in Progress in Psychobiology and Physiological Psychology, J. M. Sprague and A. N. Epstein, Eds. (Academic Press, New York, 1979), vol. 8, p. 243. 53. R. A. Hinde and J. Stevenson-Hinde, Constraints on Learning (Academic Press, New York, 1973); S. J. Shettleworth, in Advances in the Study of Behavior, D. S. Lehrman, R. A. Hinde, E. Shaw, Eds. (Academic Press, New York, 1972), vol. 4, p. 1. 54. A. Amsel,'D. R. Burdette, R. Letz, Nature (London) 262, 816 (1976); R. Letz and D. R. Burdette, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 91, 1156 (1977). 55. L. Finberg, J. Kiley, C. N. Luttrell, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 189, 121 (1963). 56. 0. Maller and J. Desor, in Fourth Symposium on Oral Sensation and Perception (Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Washington, D.C., 1973), p. 279; G. Nowlis, in ibid., p. 292. 57. W. T. James,J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 50,375 (1957); J. Rollins, Psychol. Rep. 17, 844 (1965). 58. Supported by National Institute of Arthritis, Metabolism, and Digestive Diseases grant AM18560.