Experience of Multisensory Environments in Public Space among People with Visual Impairment

This qualitative study explored the role of sensory characteristics embedded in the built environment and whether they support or hinder people with visual impairment in their use of public spaces. An online survey link was e-mailed to the presidents and committee members of each state’s chapters and associations of the National Federation of the Blind in the United States, resulting in 451 direct invitations to participate. Written responses of the survey questions from 48 respondents with visual impairment were analyzed. Three main themes: Barriers, Supporters, and Context-Dependence emerged from the respondents’ experience of multisensory characteristics within the built environment. The four subthemes subsumed in Barriers were: (1) Population specific design, (2) Extreme sensory backgrounds, (3) Uneven ground surfaces and objects, and (4) Inconsistent lighting. For Supporters, respondents provided specific examples of various sensory characteristics in built environments, including audible cues and echoes, smells, tactile quality of the ground surface, and temperature. Context-Dependence referred to the effects of sensory characteristics embedded in public spaces depending on one’s vision condition, the proximity to the sensory cues and the purpose of the activities one was performing at that moment. Findings provide occupational therapy practitioners an in-depth understanding of the transactional relationship between embedded sensory characteristics in the built environment, occupations, and people with visual impairment in order to make appropriate modifications or removal of barriers that affect occupational performance and engagement. Suggestions for occupational therapists as well as architects, designers, planners, policy makers/legislators related to functional sensory cues in the design of built environments were provided to increase accessibility in the use of public spaces by people with visual impairment.

[1]  W. Dunn,et al.  The ecology of human performance: a framework for considering the effect of context. , 1994, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[2]  Athanasios Koutsoklenis,et al.  Olfactory Cues Used for Wayfinding in Urban Environments by Individuals with Visual Impairments , 2011 .

[3]  R. Imrie,et al.  Rethinking the relationships between disability, rehabilitation, and society. , 1997, Disability and rehabilitation.

[4]  M. Wada.  Strengthening the Kawa Model: Japanese Perspectives on Person, Occupation, and Environment , 2011, Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie.

[5]  C. Christiansen,et al.  Occupational therapy : overcoming human performance deficits , 1991 .

[6]  Richard E. Morehouse,et al.  Beginning Qualitative Research: A Philosophical and Practical Guide , 1994 .

[7]  R. Imrie.  Shared Space and the Post-politics of Environmental Change , 2013 .

[8]  Margo van Hartingsveldt,et al.  Enabling Occupation II: Advancing an Occupational Therapy Vision for Health, Well-being, & Justice through Occupation , 2008 .

[9]  Konstantinos Papadopoulos,et al.  Haptic Cues Used for Outdoor Wayfinding by Individuals with Visual Impairments , 2014 .

[10]  S. Schultz,et al.  Occupational adaptation: toward a holistic approach for contemporary practice, Part 1. , 1992, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[11]  R. Imrie.  Universalism, universal design and equitable access to the built environment , 2012, Disability and rehabilitation.

[12]  Colleen McGrath,et al.  Factors That Influence the Occupational Engagement of Older Adults with Low Vision: A Scoping Review , 2013 .

[13]  Anna Trakoli,et al.  Model of Human Occupation: Theory and Application , 2010 .

[14]  S. A. Pedersen.  [Validity of qualitative research]. , 1990, Ugeskrift for laeger.

[15]  Juhani Pallasmaa,et al.  The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses , 1996 .

[16]  S. Schultz,et al.  Occupational adaptation: toward a holistic approach for contemporary practice, Part 2. , 1992, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[17]  Patricia Rigby,et al.  The Person-Environment-Occupation Model: A Transactive Approach to Occupational Performance , 1996 .

[18]  Luisa Ferronato,et al.  Enabling positive work outcomes for people with low vision: two case studies. , 2014, Work.

[19]  J. Tester,et al.  The Built Environment: Designing Communities to Promote Physical Activity in Children , 2009, Pediatrics.

[20]  M. Law,et al.  The Environment: A Focus for Occupational Therapy , 1991 .

[21]  Simon Darcy,et al.  The embodied tourist experiences of people with vision impairment: management implications beyond the visual gaze. , 2012 .

[22]  J. Morse,et al.  Qualitative Research Methods for Health Professionals , 1995 .

[23]  Rob Imrie,et al.  Auto-Disabilities: The Case of Shared Space Environments , 2012 .

[24]  M. Law,et al.  Occupational therapy practice: focusing on occupational performance. , 1997, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[25]  K. Tigges.  On philosophy of occupational therapy. , 1972, South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde.

[26]  Francisco de paula Nunes Sobrinho,et al.  Ergonomics and the inclusion of people with disabilities in a Brazilian workplace. , 2012 .

[27]  Anna-Liisa Salminen,et al.  Young persons with visual impairment: Challenges of participation , 2014, Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy.

[28]  Charles Musselwhite,et al.  The Attitudes, Perceptions and Concerns of Pedestrians and Vulnerable Road Users to Shared Space: A Case Study from the UK , 2013 .

[29]  M. Markowitz.  Occupational therapy interventions in low vision rehabilitation. , 2006, Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie.

[30]  L. Krefting.  Rigor in qualitative research: the assessment of trustworthiness. , 1991, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[31]  John Parkin,et al.  Accounting for the Needs of Blind and Visually Impaired People in Public Realm Design , 2012 .

[32]  Ute Hoffmann,et al.  The Eyes of the Skin , 2024 .

[33]  R. Imrie,et al.  Designing inclusive environments: rehabilitating the body and the relevance of universal design , 2014, Disability and rehabilitation.

[34]  Jennifer A Ailshire,et al.  Participation among adults with disability: the role of the urban environment. , 2011, Social science & medicine.

[35]  M. Law,et al.  1991 Muriel Driver lecture. The environment: a focus for occupational therapy. , 1991, Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie.

[36]  Ann Heylighen,et al.  Designerly Ways of Not Knowing: What Designers Can Learn about Space from People Who are Blind , 2014 .

[37]  James R. Marston,et al.  Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Barriers to Travel by Persons with Visual Impairments and its Mitigation through Accessible Signage , 2004 .

[38]  James R. Marston,et al.  Towards an Accessible City: Empirical Measurement and Modeling of Access to Urban Opportunities for those with Vision Impairments, Using Remote Infrared Audible Signage , 2002 .

[39]  Janet V. DeLany,et al.  Occupational therapy practice framework: domain & practice, 2nd edition. , 2008, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[40]  Mark W. Newman,et al.  Supporting visually impaired navigation: a needs-finding study , 2011, CHI Extended Abstracts.