Relevance of Timoshenko-beam model to microtubules of low shear modulus

Abstract Microtubules are characterized by extremely low shear modulus that is a few orders of magnitude lower than longitudinal modulus. In this paper, the effects of transverse shearing due to low shear modulus of microtubules are investigated using a Timoshenko-beam model, with detailed comparison between the Timoshenko-beam model, classical isotropic Euler–Bernoulli beam model and a more accurate 2D orthotropic elastic shell model. It is confirmed that transverse shearing is mainly responsible for the length-dependent flexural rigidity of an isolated microtubule reported in the literature, which cannot be explained by the widely used Euler–Bernoulli beam model. Indeed, the length-dependent flexural rigidity predicted by the Timoshenko-beam model is found to be in good quantitative agreement with known experimental data. In particular, the present Timoshenko-beam model predicts that, because of the length dependence of flexural rigidity, microtubules of different lengths could sustain almost equal maximum axial compressive force against column buckling, a conclusion that could have some interesting consequences to the mechanical behavior of cells. These results recommend that the Timoshenko-beam model offers a unified simple 1D model, which can capture the length dependence of flexural rigidity and be applied to various static and dynamic problems of microtubule mechanics.

[1]  K. Ewert,et al.  Synchrotron X-ray diffraction study of microtubules buckling and bundling under osmotic stress: a probe of interprotofilament interactions. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[2]  Stephen P. Timoshenko,et al.  Vibration problems in engineering , 1928 .

[3]  D. Ingber,et al.  Mechanical behavior in living cells consistent with the tensegrity model , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  G. Dietler,et al.  Oscillation modes of microtubules , 2004, Biology of the cell.

[5]  Saulius Juodkazis,et al.  Flexural Rigidity of a Single Microtubule , 2002 .

[6]  Christoph F Schmidt,et al.  Elastic response, buckling, and instability of microtubules under radial indentation. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[7]  Rodney M. J. Cotterill,et al.  Biophysics : An Introduction , 2002 .

[8]  Stéphanie Portet,et al.  Anisotropic elastic properties of microtubules , 2005, The European physical journal. E, Soft matter.

[9]  Manfred Schliwa,et al.  Molecular motors , 2003, Nature.

[10]  I. Gibbons.  Cilia and flagella of eukaryotes , 1981, The Journal of cell biology.

[11]  Yves Engelborghs,et al.  Dynamical and mechanical study of immobilized microtubules with atomic force microscopy , 1996 .

[12]  H Tashiro,et al.  Buckling of a single microtubule by optical trapping forces: direct measurement of microtubule rigidity. , 1995, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[13]  Marileen Dogterom,et al.  A bending mode analysis for growing microtubules: evidence for a velocity-dependent rigidity. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[14]  Giovanni Dietler,et al.  Mechanical properties of microtubules explored using the finite elements method. , 2004, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[15]  C. Schönenberger,et al.  Nanomechanics of microtubules. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[16]  R. Cross,et al.  Mechanics of the kinesin step , 2005, Nature.

[17]  J. Howard,et al.  Flexural rigidity of microtubules and actin filaments measured from thermal fluctuations in shape , 1993, The Journal of cell biology.

[18]  E. Nogales.  Structural insights into microtubule function. , 2000, Annual review of biochemistry.

[19]  Takashi Yokoyama,et al.  Vibration analysis of Timoshenko beam-columns on two-parameter elastic foundations , 1996 .

[20]  M. Schliwa,et al.  Flexural rigidity of microtubules measured with the use of optical tweezers. , 1996, Journal of cell science.

[21]  A C Maggs,et al.  Analysis of microtubule rigidity using hydrodynamic flow and thermal fluctuations. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[22]  C. Ru,et al.  Length-dependence of flexural rigidity as a result of anisotropic elastic properties of microtubules. , 2006, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[23]  J. Howard,et al.  Mechanics of Motor Proteins and the Cytoskeleton , 2001 .

[24]  D. Boal,et al.  Mechanics of the cell , 2001 .

[25]  Erwin Frey,et al.  Thermal fluctuations of grafted microtubules provide evidence of a length-dependent persistence length , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  B. Yurke,et al.  Measurement of the force-velocity relation for growing microtubules. , 1997, Science.

[27]  D. Odde,et al.  Estimates of lateral and longitudinal bond energies within the microtubule lattice , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Sumio Okuno,et al.  Parameter Identification of Aluminum Honeycomb Sandwich Panels Based on Orthotropic Timoshenko`s Beam Theory , 1997 .

[29]  E. Nogales,et al.  High-Resolution Model of the Microtubule , 1999, Cell.

[30]  Anthony M. Waas,et al.  Effects of shear deformation on buckling and free vibration of laminated composite beams , 1997 .

[31]  J. Banerjee.  Frequency equation and mode shape formulae for composite Timoshenko beams , 2001 .

[32]  J. Scholey,et al.  Cell division , 2003, Nature.

[33]  Hideo Tashiro,et al.  Flexural rigidity of individual microtubules measured by a buckling force with optical traps. , 2006, Biophysical journal.