Comparison of Brain MR Images at 1.5T Using BLADE and Rectilinear Techniques for Patients Who Move during Data Acquisition

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MR imaging of moving patients can be challenging and motion correction techniques have been proposed though some have associated new artifacts. The objective of this study was to semiquantitatively compare brain MR images of moving patients obtained at 1.5T by using partially radial and rectilinear acquisition techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: FLAIR, T2-, T1-, and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image sets of 25 patients (14–94 years) obtained by using BLADE (like PROPELLER, a partially radial acquisition) and rectilinear techniques in the same imaging session were compared by 2 neuroradiologists in terms of extent of the motion artifact, image quality, and lesion visibility. ICC between opinions of the evaluators was calculated. RESULTS: Of the total of 70 image sets, the motion artifact was small in the partially radial images in 43 and in the rectilinear images in 13, and the opinions of the evaluators were discordant in the remaining 14 sets (ICC = 0.63, P < .05). The quality of partially radial images was higher for 36 sets versus 9 rectilinear sets, with disagreement between the 2 evaluators in the remaining 25 (ICC = 0.15, P < .05). Pathologic lesions were better characterized on 37 sets of partially radial images versus 13 sets of rectilinear images, and opinions of the evaluators differed in 20 sets (ICC = 0.90, P < .05). The neuroradiologists deemed 4 sets of rectilinear images nondiagnostic compared with only 1 set of radial images. CONCLUSIONS: The data demonstrate that our application of BLADE sequences reduces the extent of motion artifacts in brain images of moving patients, improving image quality and lesion characterization.

[1]  Fenghua Jin,et al.  Prospective head‐movement correction for high‐resolution MRI using an in‐bore optical tracking system , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  James G Pipe,et al.  Brain imaging in the unsedated pediatric patient: comparison of periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction and single-shot fast spin-echo sequences. , 2003, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[3]  J. Brunberg,et al.  Adult claustrophobia, anxiety and sedation in MRI. , 1997, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[4]  Stefan Skare,et al.  An auto‐calibrated, angularly continuous, two‐dimensional GRAPPA kernel for propeller trajectories , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  J. Pipe,et al.  Improved image quality and detection of acute cerebral infarction with PROPELLER diffusion-weighted MR imaging. , 2002, Radiology.

[6]  F. Yamasaki,et al.  Role of PROPELLER diffusion weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient in the diagnosis of sellar and parasellar lesions. , 2010, European journal of radiology.

[7]  Michael Zieger,et al.  Reduced artefacts and improved assessment of hyperintense brain lesions with BLADE MR imaging in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 , 2009, Pediatric Radiology.

[8]  J. Pipe.  Motion correction with PROPELLER MRI: Application to head motion and free‐breathing cardiac imaging , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  Todd S. Sachs,et al.  The diminishing variance algorithm for real‐time reduction of motion artifacts in MRI , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  James G Pipe,et al.  Elliptical field‐of‐view PROPELLER imaging , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  James G Pipe,et al.  Multishot diffusion‐weighted FSE using PROPELLER MRI , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  Dwight G Nishimura,et al.  Anisotropic field-of-view shapes for improved PROPELLER imaging. , 2009, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[13]  Val M. Runge,et al.  Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3 Tesla Using BLADE Compared With Standard Rectilinear Data Sampling , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[14]  G H Glover,et al.  Projection Reconstruction Techniques for Reduction of Motion Effects in MRI , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  J. Felmlee,et al.  Adaptive technique for high-definition MR imaging of moving structures. , 1989, Radiology.

[16]  A. Larson,et al.  Multishot Targeted PROPELLER Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Description of the Technique and Initial Applications , 2009, Investigative radiology.

[17]  R. Bammer,et al.  Performance of PROPELLER relative to standard FSE T2-weighted imaging in pediatric brain MRI , 2009, Pediatric Radiology.

[18]  K. Arfanakis,et al.  k‐space undersampling in PROPELLER imaging , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  K. Kwong,et al.  PROPELLER‐EPI with parallel imaging using a circularly symmetric phased‐array RF coil at 3.0 T: Application to high‐resolution diffusion tensor imaging , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  J. Pipe,et al.  Turboprop: Improved PROPELLER imaging , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.