Dynamics of Membrane Excitability Determine Interspike Interval Variability: A Link Between Spike Generation Mechanisms and Cortical Spike Train Statistics

We propose a biophysical mechanism for the high interspike interval variability observed in cortical spike trains. The key lies in the nonlinear dynamics of cortical spike generation, which are consistent with type I membranes where saddle-node dynamics underlie excitability (Rinzel & Ermentrout, 1989). We present a canonical model for type I membranes, the -neuron. The -neuron is a phase model whose dynamics reflect salient features of type I membranes. This model generates spike trains with coefficient of variation (CV) above 0.6 when brought to firing by noisy inputs. This happens because the timing of spikes for a type I excitable cell is exquisitely sensitive to the amplitude of the suprathreshold stimulus pulses. A noisy input current, giving random amplitude kicks to the cell, evokes highly irregular firing across a wide range of firing rates; an intrinsically oscillating cell gives regular spike trains. We corroborate the results with simulations of the Morris-Lecar (M-L) neural model with random synaptic inputs: type I M-L yields high CVs. When this model is modified to have type II dynamics (periodicity arises via a Hopf bifurcation), however, it gives regular spike trains (CV below 0.3). Our results suggest that the high CV values such as those observed in cortical spike trains are an intrinsic characteristic of type I membranes driven to firing by random inputs. In contrast, neural oscillators or neurons exhibiting type II excitability should produce regular spike trains.

[1]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[2]  Haim Sompolinsky,et al.  Irregular firing in cortical circuits with inhibition/excitation balance , 1997 .

[3]  William R. Softky,et al.  The highly irregular firing of cortical cells is inconsistent with temporal integration of random EPSPs , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[4]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  'Balancing' of Conductances May Explain Irregular Cortical Spiking , 1995 .

[5]  Wulfram Gerstner,et al.  Population Dynamics of Spiking Neurons: Fast Transients, Asynchronous States, and Locking , 2000, Neural Computation.

[6]  J Rinzel,et al.  A theoretical basis for large coefficient of variation and bimodality in neuronal interspike interval distributions. , 1983, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  H. Hasegawa,et al.  Responses of a Hodgkin-Huxley neuron to various types of spike-train inputs. , 1999, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[8]  H. Tuckwell Nonlinear and stochastic theories , 1988 .

[9]  Idan Segev,et al.  Methods in Neuronal Modeling , 1988 .

[10]  Charles E. Smith A heuristic approach to stochastic models of single neurons , 1992 .

[11]  Bard Ermentrout,et al.  Type I Membranes, Phase Resetting Curves, and Synchrony , 1996, Neural Computation.

[12]  Marius Usher,et al.  Network Amplification of Local Fluctuations Causes High Spike Rate Variability, Fractal Firing Patterns and Oscillatory Local Field Potentials , 1994, Neural Computation.

[13]  R. FitzHugh Impulses and Physiological States in Theoretical Models of Nerve Membrane. , 1961, Biophysical journal.

[14]  P. Kloeden,et al.  Numerical Solutions of Stochastic Differential Equations , 1995 .

[15]  Michael N. Shadlen,et al.  Noise, neural codes and cortical organization , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[16]  B. Knight,et al.  Response variability and timing precision of neuronal spike trains in vivo. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  F. Ventriglia Neural Modeling and Neural Networks , 1994 .

[18]  E. Izhikevich,et al.  Weakly connected neural networks , 1997 .

[19]  Jianfeng Feng,et al.  Variability of Firing of Hodgkin-Huxley and FitzHugh-Nagumo Neurons with Stochastic Synaptic Input , 1999 .

[20]  Matthew A. Wilson,et al.  The simulation of large-scale neural networks , 1989 .

[21]  G. Ermentrout,et al.  Analysis of neural excitability and oscillations , 1989 .

[22]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve , 1952, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  R. Traub,et al.  Neuronal Networks of the Hippocampus , 1991 .

[24]  A. Hodgkin The local electric changes associated with repetitive action in a non‐medullated axon , 1948, The Journal of physiology.

[25]  Kenneth D. Miller,et al.  Physiological Gain Leads to High ISI Variability in a Simple Model of a Cortical Regular Spiking Cell , 1997, Neural Computation.

[26]  K. Purpura,et al.  Response variability in retinal ganglion cells of primates. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Reliability of spike timing in neocortical neurons. , 1995, Science.

[28]  I. Módy,et al.  Characterization of synaptically elicited GABAB responses using patch‐clamp recordings in rat hippocampal slices. , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[29]  A. C. Webb,et al.  The spontaneous activity of neurones in the cat’s cerebral cortex , 1976, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[30]  D. McCormick,et al.  Comparative electrophysiology of pyramidal and sparsely spiny stellate neurons of the neocortex. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  William R. Softky,et al.  Comparison of discharge variability in vitro and in vivo in cat visual cortex neurons. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  H. Johnson,et al.  A comparison of 'traditional' and multimedia information systems development practices , 2003, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[33]  R. Stein A THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF NEURONAL VARIABILITY. , 1965, Biophysical journal.