Modeling inspiration for innovative NPD: lessons from biomimetics

In biomimetic design, nature - natural phenomena, systems or organisms - is used as a source of inspiration for producing new ideas or concepts. While being widely recommended this approach lacks rigorous analysis and manageable systematization that would be needed in industrial contexts. Better modeling of this process of bioinspiration is a condition for applying bioinspiration to stimulate innovation in a controlled way. This paper presents a model for bioinspiration based on the framework of the C-K design theory. This model was elaborated considering a review of the existing literature on methods for implementing biomimetic design and an analysis of selected biomimetic product development case examples. The results reveal the main roles of biological knowledge in the design process (1) indication of a "design direction", meaning an expansion on the concepts space, (2) indication of knowledge domains where no or few knowledge is available, (3) reorganization of the knowledge base, activating knowledge bases that would not otherwise be activated. This improved understanding of the bioinspiration process outlines more sophisticated and profound conditions that have to be managed for creating value.

[1]  Robert L. Nagel,et al.  Function-based, biologically inspired concept generation , 2010, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[2]  Pablo Schyfter.  Technological biology? Things and kinds in synthetic biology , 2012 .

[3]  K. Autumn,et al.  Mechanisms of Adhesion in Geckos1 , 2002, Integrative and comparative biology.

[4]  Kenneth B. Kahn,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: Trends and Drivers of Success in NPD Practices: Results of the 2003 PDMA Best Practices Study* , 2009 .

[5]  Eduard Arzt,et al.  Gecko‐Inspired Surfaces: A Path to Strong and Reversible Dry Adhesives , 2010, Advanced materials.

[6]  J. Hauschildt.  Innovation, Creativity and Information Behaviour , 1996 .

[7]  Thomas Speck,et al.  Process Sequences In Biomimetic Research , 2008 .

[8]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  A methodology for supporting “transfer” in biomimetic design , 2010, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[9]  Joe Kaplinsky,et al.  Biomimicry versus Humanism , 2006 .

[10]  Martin G. Moehrle,et al.  Morphotriz – Solving Technical Problems with a Demand for Multi-Smart Solutions , 2010 .

[11]  Bo T. Christensen,et al.  The relationship of analogical distance to analogical function and preinventive structure: the case of engineering design , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[12]  Md. Mamunur Rashid,et al.  On some unique features of C–K theory of design , 2012 .

[13]  Duncan J. Irschick,et al.  Looking Beyond Fibrillar Features to Scale Gecko‐Like Adhesion , 2012, Advanced materials.

[14]  Jan Buijs,et al.  Towards a More Realistic Creative Problem Solving Approach , 2009 .

[15]  Stephen R. Rosenthal,et al.  Towards holistic front ends in new product development , 1998 .

[16]  S. R. Rosenthal,et al.  Towards holistic front ends in new product development , 1998 .

[17]  Jan Knippers,et al.  Abstraction of bio-inspired curved-line folding patterns for elastic foils and membranes in architecture , 2010 .

[18]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Ideation for Product Innovation: What are the best methods? , 2012 .

[19]  Ashok K. Goel,et al.  A content account of creative analogies in biologically inspired design , 2010, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[20]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  Towards an ontology of design: lessons from C–K design theory and Forcing , 2013 .

[21]  Cornelius Herstatt,et al.  Developing Innovations Based on Analogies: Experience from Design and Engineering Consultants , 2010 .

[22]  D. Dahl,et al.  The Influence and Value of Analogical Thinking during New Product Ideation , 2002 .

[23]  Yoseph Bar-Cohen,et al.  Biomimetics: Nature-Based Innovation , 2011 .

[24]  Jan Knippers,et al.  Design and construction principles in nature and architecture. , 2012, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[25]  W. Barthlott,et al.  Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces , 1997, Planta.

[26]  Anne,et al.  Mechanisms of Adhesion in Geckos 1 , 2008 .

[27]  Andreas Solga,et al.  The dream of staying clean: Lotus and biomimetic surfaces , 2007, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[28]  Terri Peters,et al.  Nature as Measure: The Biomimicry Guild , 2011 .

[29]  Mitzi M. Montoya,et al.  Antecedents and Consequences of Creativity in Product Innovation Teams , 2013 .

[30]  Petra Badke-Schaub,et al.  FIND YOUR INSPIRATION: EXPLORING DIFFERENT LEVELS OF ABSTRACTION IN TEXTUAL STIMULI , 2012 .

[31]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  A functional representation for aiding biomimetic and artificial inspiration of new ideas , 2005, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[32]  Wolfgang Beitz,et al.  Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach , 1984 .

[33]  Yoseph Bar-Cohen,et al.  Biomimetics : Biologically Inspired Technologies , 2011 .

[34]  Ashok K. Goel,et al.  Representation, Indexing, and Retrieval of Biological Cases for Biologically Inspired Design , 2011, ICCBR.

[35]  L. Shu,et al.  Using descriptions of biological phenomena for idea generation , 2008 .

[36]  Pek Van Andel.  Serendipity: “Expect also the Unexpected” , 1992 .

[37]  Nigel Coates,et al.  Idea generation techniques in an industrial market , 1997 .

[38]  Jon M. Harkness,et al.  In Appreciation¶A Lifetime of Connections: Otto Herbert Schmitt, 1913 - 1998 , 2002 .

[39]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  The role of timing and analogical similarity in the stimulation of idea generation in design , 2008 .

[40]  Yukari Nagai,et al.  A systematized theory of creative concept generation in design: first-order and high-order concept generation , 2013 .

[41]  Casper Boks,et al.  On the use of Biomimicry as a Useful Tool for the Industrial Designer , 2012 .

[42]  Martin G. Moehrle,et al.  What is TRIZ? From Conceptual Basics to a Framework for Research , 2005 .

[43]  Mohammad-Reza Matini.  Biegsame Konstruktionen in der Architektur auf der Basis bionischer Prinzipien , 2007 .

[44]  David W. Rosen,et al.  The effects of biological examples in idea generation , 2010 .

[45]  Offer Shai,et al.  Creative conceptual design: Extending the scope by infused design , 2009, Comput. Aided Des..

[46]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  C-K design theory: an advanced formulation , 2008 .

[47]  Susan E. Reid,et al.  The Fuzzy Front End of New Product Development for Discontinuous Innovations: A Theoretical Model , 2004 .

[48]  Bharat Bhushan,et al.  Biomimetics: lessons from nature–an overview , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[49]  A. Marshall,et al.  QUESTIONING THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF BIOMIMICRY , 2009 .

[50]  Adrian Bowyer,et al.  Putting Biology into TRIZ: A Database of Biological Effects , 2005 .

[51]  Bernd Hill,et al.  Goal Setting Through Contradiction Analysis in the Bionics-Oriented Construction Process , 2005 .

[52]  Ashok K. Goel,et al.  Biologically inspired design: process and products , 2009 .

[53]  L. H. Shu,et al.  A natural-language approach to biomimetic design , 2010, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[54]  Thomas Hesselberg,et al.  Biomimetics and the case of the remarkable ragworms , 2007, Naturwissenschaften.

[55]  Emily J Reed,et al.  Biomimicry as a route to new materials: what kinds of lessons are useful? , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[56]  J Lienhard,et al.  Flectofin: a hingeless flapping mechanism inspired by nature , 2011, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[57]  Allan Campbell,et al.  Life in Science , 2012, Bacteriophage.

[58]  Yoram Reich,et al.  Substance Field Analysis and Biological Functions , 2015 .

[59]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  Teaching innovative design reasoning: How concept–knowledge theory can help overcome fixation effects , 2011, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[60]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity , 1996 .

[61]  R. Full,et al.  Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair , 2000, Nature.

[62]  Nathan F. Lepora,et al.  The state of the art in biomimetics , 2012, Living Machines.

[63]  Paul Verschure,et al.  The state of the art in biomimetics. , 2013, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[64]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  A theoretical analysis of creativity methods in engineering design: casting and improving ASIT within C–K theory , 2012 .

[65]  Ajay Vikram Singh,et al.  Bio-inspired approaches to design smart fabrics , 2012 .

[66]  Marine Agogué,et al.  The impacts of examples on creative design : explaining fixation and stimulation effects , 2014 .

[67]  Steven Vogel,et al.  Nature's Swell, But Is It Worth Copying? , 2003 .

[68]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  A NEW APPROACH OF INNOVATIVE DESIGN : AN INTRODUCTION TO C-K THEORY. , 2003 .

[69]  L. H. Shu,et al.  Biologically inspired design , 2010, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[70]  Metin Sitti,et al.  Gecko-inspired controllable adhesive structures applied to micromanipulation , 2012 .

[71]  Moon Kyu Kwak,et al.  Towards the Next Level of Bioinspired Dry Adhesives: New Designs and Applications , 2011 .

[72]  T. Speck,et al.  Mechanics without muscle: biomechanical inspiration from the plant world. , 2010, Integrative and comparative biology.

[73]  J. Vincent,et al.  Biomimetics: its practice and theory , 2006, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[74]  Gerald F. Smith.  Idea‐Generation Techniques: A Formulary of Active Ingredients , 1998 .

[75]  M. R. Matini,et al.  Application Of \“abstract Formal Patterns” ForTranslating Natural Principles Into The Design OfNew Deployable Structures In Architecture , 2008 .