Relating supply network structure to productive efficiency: A multi-stage empirical investigation

The potential of Social Network Analysis (SNA) to characterize supply network structure is of growing interest in supply chain management, although the related literature provides few empirical investigations. This study identifies those SNA measures most closely associated with supply chain efficiency, using archival inter-firm relationship data collected from U.S. public companies in multiple industries. In a three-stage procedure, a DEA model is applied to measure firm- and chain-level efficiencies, followed by a correlation analysis to group SNA variables into clusters of high correlation. These clusters are used in a step-wise regression algorithm to identify those variables most relevant to productive efficiency while accounting for multicollinearity. The supply network structural characteristics that emerge as significant are consistent with many hypothesized relationships in the literature, although not without exceptions, such as an interesting tradeoff between the benefit of connectedness and a penalty for closeness.

[1]  E. H. Neilsen,et al.  The subordinate's predicaments. , 1979, Harvard business review.

[2]  P. J. Huber The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions , 1967 .

[3]  Yves L. Doz,et al.  The science behind the smile. Interview by Gardiner Morse. , 2012 .

[4]  Panos Kouvelis,et al.  Supply Chain Management Research and Production and Operations Management: Review, Trends, and Opportunities , 2006 .

[5]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Supply networks and complex adaptive systems: Control versus emergence , 2001 .

[6]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Performance Impacts of Information Technology: Is Actual Usage the Missing Link? , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[7]  S. Borgatti,et al.  On Social Network Analysis in a Supply Chain Context , 2009 .

[8]  Jorgen P. Bansler,et al.  Corporate Intranet Implementation: Managing Emergent Technologies and Organizational Practices , 2000, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Hong Yan,et al.  Network DEA model for supply chain performance evaluation , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Sharon L. Milgram,et al.  The Small World Problem , 1967 .

[11]  Hui-Huang Hsu,et al.  Feature Selection via Correlation Coefficient Clustering , 2010, J. Softw..

[12]  Radhika Santhanam,et al.  Issues in Linking Information Technology Capability to Firm Performance , 2003, MIS Q..

[13]  Nitin Joglekar,et al.  Supply Chain Integration, Product Modularity, and Market Valuation: Evidence from the Solar Energy Industry , 2013 .

[14]  M. Huson,et al.  Managerial Succession and Firm Performance , 2004 .

[15]  Gábor Benedek,et al.  The Importance of Social Embeddedness: Churn Models at Mobile Providers , 2014, Decis. Sci..

[16]  Timothy Coelli,et al.  An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis , 1997 .

[17]  Peter V. Marsden,et al.  Egocentric and sociocentric measures of network centrality , 2002, Soc. Networks.

[18]  Yael V. Hochberg,et al.  Whom You Know Matters: Venture Capital Networks and Investment Performance , 2004 .

[19]  Farren J. Isaacs,et al.  Programming cells by multiplex genome engineering and accelerated evolution , 2009, Nature.

[20]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Structural investigation of supply networks: A social network analysis approach , 2011 .

[21]  Shie-Jue Lee,et al.  Dimensionality reduction by feature clustering for regression problems , 2015, Inf. Sci..

[22]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  A Theory of the Nexus Supplier: A Critical Supplier from a Network Perspective , 2014 .

[23]  Chien-Ming Chen,et al.  Measuring Corporate Social Performance: An Efficiency Perspective , 2010 .

[24]  John McDonald,et al.  Using least squares and tobit in second stage DEA efficiency analyses , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  Joe Zhu,et al.  DEA models for supply chain efficiency evaluation , 2006, Ann. Oper. Res..

[26]  Greg N. Gregoriou,et al.  Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking: Data Envelopment Analysis with Spreadsheets , 2008, The Journal of Wealth Management.

[27]  Rahul C. Basole,et al.  Visual analysis of supply network risks: Insights from the electronics industry , 2014, Decis. Support Syst..

[28]  Kalyan Singhal,et al.  Imperatives of the science of operations and supply-chain management , 2012 .

[29]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  TRIADS IN SUPPLY NETWORKS: THEORIZING BUYER–SUPPLIER–SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIPS , 2009 .

[30]  Sengun Yeniyurt,et al.  The Role of Ego Networks in Manufacturing Joint Venture Formations , 2014 .

[31]  James N. Baron,et al.  Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace , 1997 .

[32]  J. Francis,et al.  Have financial statements lost their relevance , 1999 .

[33]  M. Farrell The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[34]  Stefan H. Thomke,et al.  Six Myths of Product Development , 2012 .

[35]  R. Schmenner How can service businesses survive and prosper? , 1986, Sloan management review.

[36]  John Swales,et al.  A note on profitability as a measure of company efficiency , 1982 .

[37]  Kenneth K. Boyer,et al.  DRIVERS OF INTERNET PURCHASING SUCCESS , 2002 .

[38]  Marcus A. Bellamy,et al.  The influence of supply network structure on firm innovation , 2014 .

[39]  Terry Anthony Byrd,et al.  A framework for measuring the efficiency of organizational investments in information technology using data envelopment analysis , 2000 .

[40]  Surya D. Pathak,et al.  Toward a structural view of co‐opetition in supply networks , 2014 .

[41]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  One-stage and two-stage DEA estimation of the effects of contextual variables , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[42]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  The Supply Base and Its Complexity: Implications For Transaction Costs, Risks, Responsiveness, and Innovation , 2006 .

[43]  C. Billington,et al.  Leveraging Open Innovation Using Intermediary Networks , 2013 .

[44]  Almas Heshmati,et al.  Knowledge capital and performance heterogeneity: : A firm-level innovation study , 2002 .

[45]  Esmeralda A. Ramalho,et al.  Fractional regression models for second stage DEA efficiency analyses , 2010 .

[46]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: History, Models, and Interpretations , 2011 .

[47]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[48]  Manuel E. Sosa Realizing the Need for Rework: From Task Interdependence to Social Networks , 2014 .

[49]  David A. Smith,et al.  Measuring Centrality and Power Recursively in the World City Network: A Reply to Neal: , 2013 .

[50]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Measuring Information Technology's Indirect Impact on Firm Performance , 2004, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[51]  Joe Zhu,et al.  DEA models for two‐stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition , 2008 .

[52]  Donald W. Marquaridt Generalized Inverses, Ridge Regression, Biased Linear Estimation, and Nonlinear Estimation , 1970 .

[53]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[54]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  A new fuzzy DEA model for evaluation of efficiency and effectiveness of suppliers in sustainable supply chain management context , 2015, Comput. Oper. Res..

[55]  C. Carter,et al.  How to Become Central in an Informal Social Network: An Investigation of the Antecedents to Network Centrality in an Environmental SCM Initiative , 2015 .

[56]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[57]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Evaluating Contextual Variables Affecting Productivity Using Data Envelopment Analysis , 2008, Oper. Res..

[58]  Zach G. Zacharia,et al.  Concentrated supply chain membership and financial performance: Chain‐ and firm‐level perspectives , 2010 .

[59]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking: Data Envelopment Analysis with Spreadsheets and DEA Excel Solver , 2002 .

[60]  Corey C. Phelps,et al.  Interfirm Collaboration Networks: The Impact of Large-Scale Network Structure on Firm Innovation , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[61]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Toward the Theory of the Supply Chain , 2015 .

[62]  Ayoe Hoff,et al.  Second stage DEA: Comparison of approaches for modelling the DEA score , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[63]  Chad W. Autry,et al.  SUPPLY CHAIN CAPITAL: THE IMPACT OF STRUCTURAL AND RELATIONAL LINKAGES ON FIRM EXECUTION AND INNOVATION , 2008 .

[64]  Zachary P. Neal,et al.  Differentiating Centrality and Power in the World City Network , 2011 .

[65]  Maggie Chuoyan Dong,et al.  Opportunism in Distribution Networks: The Role of Network Embeddedness and Dependence , 2015 .

[66]  H. White A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[67]  S. Borgatti,et al.  The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology , 2003 .

[68]  Rafal Drezewski,et al.  The application of social network analysis algorithms in a system supporting money laundering detection , 2015, Inf. Sci..

[69]  Benjamin B. M. Shao,et al.  Technical efficiency analysis of information technology investments: a two-stage empirical investigation , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[70]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[71]  Benjamin B. M. Shao,et al.  Relative Sizes of Information Technology Investments and Productive Efficiency: Their Linkage and Empirical Evidence , 2000, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[72]  Sunder Kekre,et al.  Interdisciplinary and Interorganizational Research: Establishing the Science of Enterprise Networks , 2005 .

[73]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  On the use, usefulness, and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research: a note of caution , 1995 .

[74]  Efthymios G. Tsionas,et al.  Short-run and long-run performance of international tourism: evidence from Bayesian dynamic models. , 2014 .

[75]  Yusoon Kim,et al.  Supply network disruption and resilience: A network structural perspective , 2015 .

[76]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Network Analysis in the Social Sciences , 2009, Science.