A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

BACKGROUND Minimally invasive, laparoscopically assisted surgery was first considered in 1990 for patients undergoing colectomy for cancer. Concern that this approach would compromise survival by failing to achieve a proper oncologic resection or adequate staging or by altering patterns of recurrence (based on frequent reports of tumor recurrences within surgical wounds) prompted a controlled trial evaluation. METHODS We conducted a noninferiority trial at 48 institutions and randomly assigned 872 patients with adenocarcinoma of the colon to undergo open or laparoscopically assisted colectomy performed by credentialed surgeons. The median follow-up was 4.4 years. The primary end point was the time to tumor recurrence. RESULTS At three years, the rates of recurrence were similar in the two groups--16 percent among patients in the group that underwent laparoscopically assisted surgery and 18 percent among patients in the open-colectomy group (two-sided P=0.32; hazard ratio for recurrence, 0.86; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.63 to 1.17). Recurrence rates in surgical wounds were less than 1 percent in both groups (P=0.50). The overall survival rate at three years was also very similar in the two groups (86 percent in the laparoscopic-surgery group and 85 percent in the open-colectomy group; P=0.51; hazard ratio for death in the laparoscopic-surgery group, 0.91; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.68 to 1.21), with no significant difference between groups in the time to recurrence or overall survival for patients with any stage of cancer. Perioperative recovery was faster in the laparoscopic-surgery group than in the open-colectomy group, as reflected by a shorter median hospital stay (five days vs. six days, P<0.001) and briefer use of parenteral narcotics (three days vs. four days, P<0.001) and oral analgesics (one day vs. two days, P=0.02). The rates of intraoperative complications, 30-day postoperative mortality, complications at discharge and 60 days, hospital readmission, and reoperation were very similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS In this multi-institutional study, the rates of recurrent cancer were similar after laparoscopically assisted colectomy and open colectomy, suggesting that the laparoscopic approach is an acceptable alternative to open surgery for colon cancer.

[1]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .

[2]  W. Haenszel,et al.  Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. , 1959, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[3]  D. Cox.  Regression Models and Life-Tables , 1972 .

[4]  S. Pocock,et al.  Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. , 1975, Biometrics.

[5]  A. Keats.  The ASA classification of physical status--a recapitulation. , 1978, Anesthesiology.

[6]  R. Gray.  A Class of $K$-Sample Tests for Comparing the Cumulative Incidence of a Competing Risk , 1988 .

[7]  J. E. Barone,et al.  Correction: A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  J. Sanabria,et al.  Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. , 1992, Surgery.

[9]  N J Soper,et al.  Laparoscopic general surgery. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  G. Kazemier,et al.  Subcutaneous metastases after laparoscopic colectomy , 1994, The Lancet.

[11]  G. C. Hoffman,et al.  Laparoscopic‐Assisted Colectomy Initial Experience , 1994, Annals of surgery.

[12]  H. Nelson,et al.  Proposed phase III trial comparing laparoscopic-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for colon cancer. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[13]  J. Sackier,et al.  Laparoscopic colectomy , 1996 .

[14]  H. Nelson,et al.  Wound recurrence following conventional treatment of colorectal cancer , 1996, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[15]  D Rattner,et al.  Early results of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer , 1996, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[16]  J. E. Fetter,et al.  Port site recurrences after laparoscopic and thoracoscopic procedures in malignancy. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  H. Nelson,et al.  Laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: trial update. , 1998, Journal of surgical oncology.

[18]  G. Maddern,et al.  Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection of Colorectal Malignancies: A Systematic Review , 2001, Annals of surgery.

[19]  Antoni Castells,et al.  Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[20]  D. Sargent,et al.  Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial. , 2002, JAMA.

[21]  D.,et al.  Regression Models and Life-Tables , 2022 .