Standardized North American Marsh Bird Monitoring Protocol

Abstract. Little is known about the population status of many marsh-dependent birds in North America but recent efforts have focused on collecting more reliable information and estimates of population trends. As part of that effort, a standardized survey protocol was developed in 1999 that provided guidance for conducting marsh bird surveys throughout North America such that data would be consistent among locations. The original survey protocol has been revised to provide greater clarification on many issues as the number of individuals using the protocol has grown. The Standardized North American Marsh Bird Monitoring Protocol instructs surveyors to conduct an initial 5-minute passive point-count survey followed by a series of 1-minute segments during which marsh bird calls are broadcast into the marsh following a standardized approach. Surveyors are instructed to record each individual bird from the suite of 26 focal species that are present in their local area on separate lines of a datasheet and estimate the distance to each bird. Also, surveyors are required to record whether each individual bird was detected within each 1-minute subsegment of the survey. These data allow analysts to use several different approaches for estimating detection probability. The Standardized North American Marsh Bird Monitoring Protocol provides detailed instructions that explain the field methods used to monitor marsh birds in North America.

[1]  M. Legare,et al.  The effectiveness of tape playback in estimating black rail density , 1999 .

[2]  J. Gibbs,et al.  EFFECTIVENESS OF CALL-BROADCAST SURVEYS FOR MONITORING MARSH BIRDS , 2005 .

[3]  C. Conway,et al.  SPECIES OCCURRENCE OF MARSH BIRDS AT CAPE COD NATIONAL SEASHORE, MASSACHUSETTS , 2002 .

[4]  C. Conway,et al.  Seasonal changes in Yuma clapper rail vocalization rate and habitat use , 1993 .

[5]  C. Conway,et al.  Status and habitat use of the California black rail in the southwestern USA , 2007, Wetlands.

[6]  W. Link,et al.  ESTIMATING POPULATION CHANGE FROM COUNT DATA: APPLICATION TO THE NORTH AMERICAN BREEDING BIRD SURVEY , 1998 .

[7]  Terry L. Shaffer,et al.  A Sampling Design Framework for Monitoring Secretive Marshbirds , 2009 .

[8]  W. Thompson,et al.  TOWARDS RELIABLE BIRD SURVEYS: ACCOUNTING FOR INDIVIDUALS PRESENT BUT NOT DETECTED , 2002 .

[9]  K. Pollock,et al.  Effects of Vegetation and Background Noise on the Detection Process in Auditory Avian Point-Count Surveys , 2008 .

[10]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY RATES WHEN DETECTION PROBABILITIES ARE LESS THAN ONE , 2002, Ecology.

[11]  Douglas H. Johnson.  In Defense of Indices: The Case of Bird Surveys , 2008 .

[12]  R. Tiner,et al.  Wetlands of the United States : current status and recent trends / by Ralph W. Tiner, Jr. ... [et al.]. , 1984 .

[13]  B. Peterjohn,et al.  Proceedings of the marsh bird monitoring workshop , 1999 .

[14]  J. Nichols,et al.  A DOUBLE-OBSERVER APPROACH FOR ESTIMATING DETECTION PROBABILITY AND ABUNDANCE FROM POINT COUNTS , 2000 .

[15]  G. Baldassarre,et al.  Temporal variation in detection of marsh birds during broadcast of conspecific calls , 2007 .

[16]  R. O’Connor,et al.  HOW WELL DO CONSISTENTLY MONITORED BREEDING BIRD SURVEY ROUTES REPRESENT THE ENVIRONMENTS OF THE CONTERMINOUS UNITED STATES? , 2004 .

[17]  Kenneth H. Pollock,et al.  A novel field evaluation of the effectiveness of distance and independent observer sampling to estimate aural avian detection probabilities , 2008 .

[18]  David R. Anderson,et al.  LANDBIRD COUNTING TECHNIQUES: CURRENT PRACTICES AND AN ALTERNATIVE , 2002 .

[19]  C. Conway,et al.  Maximizing detection probability of wetland-dependent birds during point-count surveys in northwestern Florida , 2008 .

[20]  Black Rail (Laterallus jamaicensis) , 1994 .

[21]  J. Gibbs,et al.  Summary of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors Affecting Detection Probability of Marsh Birds , 2011, Wetlands.

[22]  K. Pollock,et al.  A Field Evaluation of Distance Measurement Error in Auditory Avian Point Count Surveys , 2007 .

[23]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  ESTIMATING POPULATION TRENDS WITH A LINEAR MODEL: TECHNICAL COMMENTS , 2004 .

[24]  D. Bystrak,et al.  The north american breeding bird survey. , 1981 .

[25]  C. Conway,et al.  FACTORS AFFECTING DETECTION PROBABILITY OF CALIFORNIA BLACK RAILS , 2004 .

[26]  G. Baldassarre,et al.  The effectiveness of call-response surveys for detecting least bitterns , 2002 .

[27]  Kenneth H. Pollock,et al.  TIME-OF-DETECTION METHOD FOR ESTIMATING ABUNDANCE FROM POINT-COUNT SURVEYS , 2007 .

[28]  C. S. Robbins,et al.  The Breeding Bird Survey: Its First Fifteen Years, 1965-1979 , 1987 .

[29]  Linden A. Piest,et al.  Fire helps restore natural disturbance regime to benefit rare and endangered marsh birds endemic to the Colorado River. , 2010, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[30]  Eric C. Soehren,et al.  Influence of Tidal Height on Detection of Breeding Marsh Birds Along the Northern Gulf of Mexico , 2009 .

[31]  S. Buckland.  Introduction to distance sampling : estimating abundance of biological populations , 2001 .

[32]  C. Conway,et al.  NESTING SUCCESS AND SURVIVAL OF VIRGINIA RAILS AND SORAS , 1994 .

[33]  W. Kendall,et al.  First-Time Observer Effects in the North American Breeding Bird Survey , 1996 .

[34]  Kenneth P. Burnham,et al.  Summarizing remarks: environmental influences , 1981 .

[35]  Gary C. White,et al.  Monitoring Vertebrate Populations , 1998 .

[36]  J. Gibbs,et al.  Call-Response Surveys for Monitoring Breeding Waterbirds , 1993 .

[37]  C. Conway,et al.  Effects of Broadcasting Conspecific and Heterospecific Calls on Detection of Marsh Birds in North America , 2010, Wetlands.

[38]  Kenneth H. Pollock,et al.  A REMOVAL MODEL FOR ESTIMATING DETECTION PROBABILITIES FROM POINT-COUNT SURVEYS , 2002 .

[39]  F. Knopf,et al.  Conservation of North American rallids , 1988 .