Bird monitoring using the smartphone (iOS) application Videography for motion detection

ABSTRACT Capsule: Automated monitoring of daily activity in birds can be facilitated by the use of a smartphone with video analysis software. Aims: To test the application of an iPhone 5 smartphone with video motion detection for monitoring birds remotely, transferring the data over a mobile network and extracting the data automatically. Methods: A customized bird feeder was used at an established feeding site where high visitor frequency provided a rigorous test of procedures. The application Videography was used to detect birds visiting the feeder. This runs advanced algorithms on the camera input to detect motion and trigger automated video recordings. Results: Recorded video was stored immediately in a cloud service or locally on the smartphone. The data were automatically processed using R-scripts, obviating the need for manual data entry prior to analysis. Bird visits to the feeder were distributed throughout the day, increasing rapidly after sunrise and ceasing before dusk. Conclusions: The system offered a novel and efficient means of automatically monitoring birds visiting a central place, and it would be suitable for close-up monitoring of birds that regularly visit the entrances of cavities, nests or feeding places.

[1]  G. Sonerud,et al.  Evolution of parental roles in provisioning birds: diet determines role asymmetry in raptors , 2014 .

[2]  Herman Kruegle Chapter 12 – Video Motion Detectors , 1995 .

[3]  Niels J. Dingemanse,et al.  The relation between dominance and exploratory behavior is context-dependent in wild great tits , 2004 .

[4]  Sara M. Kross,et al.  A portable low‐cost remote videography system for monitoring wildlife , 2011 .

[5]  Ahmed E. Hassan,et al.  What Do Mobile App Users Complain About? , 2015, IEEE Software.

[6]  A. U.S.,et al.  QUANTIFYING NORTHERN GOSHAWK DIETS USING REMOTE CAMERAS AND OBSERVATIONS FROM BLINDS , 2007 .

[7]  Ronny Steen,et al.  Corrigendum to: Video-surveillance system for remote long-term in situ observations: recording diel cavity use and behaviour of wild European lobsters (Homarus gammarus) , 2014 .

[8]  A. F. O'connell,et al.  Camera Traps in Animal Ecology , 2011 .

[9]  Herman Kruegle,et al.  Video Motion Detectors , 2006 .

[10]  G. Miller,et al.  Science Perspectives on Psychological the Smartphone Psychology Manifesto on Behalf Of: Association for Psychological Science the Smartphone Psychology Manifesto Previous Research Using Mobile Electronic Devices What Smartphones Can Do Now and Will Be Able to Do in the near Future , 2022 .

[11]  B. Godley,et al.  Effectiveness of a smartphone application for testing near visual acuity , 2015, Eye.

[12]  Ronny Steen,et al.  Portable digital video surveillance system for monitoring flower-visiting bumblebees , 2011 .

[13]  Sara M. Kross,et al.  Diet composition and prey choice of New Zealand falcons nesting in anthropogenic and natural habitats , 2013 .

[14]  Ning Ding,et al.  Characterizing and modeling the impact of wireless signal strength on smartphone battery drain , 2013, SIGMETRICS '13.

[15]  David N. Bonter,et al.  Daily foraging patterns in free-living birds: exploring the predation–starvation trade-off , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  Denzil Ferreira,et al.  Understanding Human-Smartphone Concerns: A Study of Battery Life , 2011, Pervasive.

[17]  S. Renner,et al.  Food Preferences of Winter Bird Communities in Different Forest Types , 2012, PloS one.

[18]  Using time‐to‐event analysis to complement hierarchical methods when assessing determinants of photographic detectability during camera trapping , 2014 .

[19]  John-André Henden,et al.  Towards good practice guidance in using camera‐traps in ecology: influence of sampling design on validity of ecological inferences , 2013 .

[20]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[21]  Carol L. Chambers,et al.  Avian Use of Desert Wildlife Water Developments as Determined by Remote Videography , 2008 .

[22]  Ben Agger,et al.  iTime: Labor and life in a smartphone era , 2011 .

[23]  Ronny Steen,et al.  Diel activity, frequency and visit duration of pollinators in focal plants: in situ automatic camera monitoring and data processing , 2017 .

[24]  K. Wiebe,et al.  Foraging Trade‐offs between Prey Size, Delivery Rate and Prey Type: How Does Niche Breadth and Early Learning of the Foraging Niche Affect Food Delivery? , 2015 .

[25]  Ronny Steen,et al.  A Portable Digital Video Surveillance System to Monitor Prey Deliveries at Raptor Nests , 2009 .

[26]  P. Pechacek,et al.  Use of non-stop video surveillance to monitor breeding activity of primary cavity nesters in remote areas , 2005, acta ethologica.

[27]  A. F. O'connell,et al.  Camera traps in animal ecology : methods and analyses , 2011 .

[28]  Richard Inger,et al.  Smartphones in ecology and evolution: a guide for the app-rehensive , 2013, Ecology and evolution.

[29]  Ben G. Weinstein,et al.  MotionMeerkat: integrating motion video detection and ecological monitoring , 2015 .