Performability of Automated Manufacturing Systems

Abstract Automated manufacturing systems (AMSs) can be regarded as flexible, degradable, fault-tolerant systems. To evaluate such systems, we need combined measures of performance and reliability, called performability measures. The most important performability measures in the AMS context are related to throughput and manufacturing lead time (MLT) since high productivity and low lead times are prime features determining the competitiveness of AMSs. Performability has a strong relation to the notion of flexibility in manufacturing systems. Performability modeling is an active research topic in the area of fault-tolerant computing systems. Performability studies are of great interest in the AMS context also, since performability enables to quantify flexibility and competitiveness of a manufacturing system. In this article, we use the conceptualization available in the area of fault-tolerant computing, to formulate performability notions for AMSs. We consider steady-state performability, interval performability, and distribution of performability with respect to throughput and MLT measures. Through several illustrative examples and numerical results, we bring out the importance of performability modeling and evaluation in AMS design. The AMS examples discussed are: (i) a versatile machine center with machine failures and repairs, and (ii) a generic flexible manufacturing system with centralized material handling, where the performance could be described by a closed central server model.

[1]  Bruno Sericola,et al.  Performability Analysis Using Semi-Markov Reard Processes , 1990, IEEE Trans. Computers.

[2]  Kishor S. Trivedi,et al.  Queueing Analysis of Fault-Tolerant Computer Systems , 1987, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[3]  Yadati Narahari,et al.  Performance modeling of automated manufacturing systems , 1992 .

[4]  Edmundo de Souza e Silva,et al.  Calculating availability and performability measures of repairable computer systems using randomization , 1989, JACM.

[5]  Kishor S. Trivedi,et al.  Performability Analysis: Measures, an Algorithm, and a Case Study , 1988, IEEE Trans. Computers.

[6]  Richard Shell,et al.  A computerized integrated performance-reliability measure of a flexible automated production system , 1990 .

[7]  Kishor S. Trivedi,et al.  An Aggregation Technique for the Transient Analysis of Stiff Markov Chains , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[8]  Andrew L. Reibman,et al.  Modeling the Effect of Reliability on Performance , 1990, SIGMETRICS.

[9]  D. Gaver A Waiting Line with Interrupted Service, Including Priorities , 1962 .

[10]  Ravindra Rao Dynamics of Discrete Event Systems , 1991 .

[11]  John F. Meyer,et al.  On Evaluating the Performability of Degradable Computing Systems , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[12]  Kishor S. Trivedi,et al.  NUMERICAL EVALUATION OF PERFORMABILITY AND JOB COMPLETION TIME IN REPAIRABLE FAULT-TOLERANT SYSTEMS. , 1990 .

[13]  John F. Meyer,et al.  Closed-Form Solutions of Performability , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[14]  Philip Heidelberger,et al.  Analysis of Performability for Stochastic Models of Fault-Tolerant Systems , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[15]  B. Avi-Itzhak,et al.  A Many-Server Queue with Service Interruptions , 1968, Oper. Res..

[16]  Kanth Miriyala,et al.  Reliability analysis of flexible manufacturing systems , 1989 .

[17]  Kishor S. Trivedi,et al.  Probabilistic modeling of computer system availability , 1987 .

[18]  David D. Yao,et al.  On queueing network models of flexible manufacturing systems , 1986, Queueing Syst. Theory Appl..

[19]  M. D. Beaudry,et al.  Performance-Related Reliability Measures for Computing Systems , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[20]  Lorenzo Donatiello,et al.  Analysis of a composite performance reliability measure for fault-tolerant systems , 1987, JACM.