The highs and lows of the interaction between word meaning and space.

We examined whether the processing of words associated with distinct spatial locations automatically biases behavior toward these locations in space. In four experiments (Ns = 30, 34, 32, 32), participants were shown stimuli denoting objects typically associated with the upper and lower regions of visual space. In Experiment 1, words were categorized as man-made or natural by pressing one of two vertically arranged keys. Reaction times were faster for trials in which response locations were congruent with the stimulus-associated locations. Experiment 2 replicated the stimulus-response congruency effect when the stimuli were presented in a pictorial format. Stimuli-space interactions therefore seem to be driven by an automatic activation of the spatial attributes associated with the stimuli, irrespective of input format. In Experiments 3 and 4, a target detection task involving only one response button was employed to examine whether the effects observed in the first two experiments were due to attentional shifts, independent of response selection processes. In both experiments, the previously observed congruence effect between words and space either diminished or vanished completely. Consequently, the results of the four experiments in the current study point to a dominant role of response-selection processes in the genesis of space-object word interactions.

[1]  W. Schwarz,et al.  Searching for the functional locus of the SNARC effect: Evidence for a response-related origin , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[2]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Spatial iconicity affects semantic relatedness judgments , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[3]  Guilherme Wood,et al.  On the Cognitive Link between Space and Number: A Meta-Analysis of the SNARC Effect , 2008 .

[4]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[5]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  T. Loetscher,et al.  Eye position predicts what number you have in mind , 2010, Current Biology.

[8]  Giovanni Galfano,et al.  Number magnitude orients attention, but not against one’s will , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[10]  A. Glenberg,et al.  What memory is for: Creating meaning in the service of action , 1997, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[11]  Carlo Umiltà,et al.  Attention shifts produce spatial stimulus codes , 1994, Psychological research.

[12]  Tom M. Mitchell,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 2011 Commonality of neural representations of words and pictures , 2016 .

[13]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Interactions between perceptual and numerical space , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  Carlo Umiltà,et al.  The Simon effect occurs relative to the direction of an attention shift , 1997 .

[15]  Bruno L. Giordano,et al.  Spatial representation of pitch height: the SMARC effect , 2006, Cognition.

[16]  Michael D. Dodd,et al.  Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  Wim Gevers,et al.  Look, no hands: A perceptual task shows that number magnitude induces shifts of attention , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  A. Kingstone,et al.  The number line effect reflects top-down control , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Functional anatomy of a common semantic system for words and pictures , 1996, Nature.

[20]  Srini Narayanan,et al.  Spatial and Linguistic Aspects of Visual Imagery in Sentence Comprehension , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[21]  R. Ulrich,et al.  Left–right coding of past and future in language: The mental timeline during sentence processing , 2010, Cognition.

[22]  Guilherme Wood,et al.  Numbers, space, and action – From finger counting to the mental number line and beyond , 2008, Cortex.

[23]  K. Zanolie,et al.  Congruency between Word Position and Meaning is Caused by Task-Induced Spatial Attention , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[24]  Mia Setic,et al.  The influence of vertical spatial orientation on property verification , 2007 .

[25]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis , 1992 .

[26]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. , 1998 .

[27]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[28]  B. Kaup,et al.  Root versus roof: automatic activation of location information during word processing , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  Sean Duffy,et al.  Spatial Representations Elicit Dual-Coding Effects in Mental Imagery , 2009, Cogn. Sci..

[30]  Daniel C. Richardson,et al.  Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[31]  Wim Notebaert,et al.  Sequential analysis of a Simon task – evidence for an attention-shift account , 2001, Psychological research.

[32]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Head Up, Foot Down , 2008, Psychological science.

[33]  Alison L. Chasteen,et al.  Thinking of God moves attention , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  Christopher A. Kurby,et al.  Perceptual simulations and linguistic representations have differential effects on speeded relatedness judgements and recognition memory , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[35]  K. Priftis,et al.  Brain damage: Neglect disrupts the mental number line , 2002, Nature.

[36]  M. Louwerse Embodied relations are encoded in language , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[37]  Wim Fias,et al.  The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized , 2003, Cognition.

[38]  B Hommel,et al.  The role of attention for the Simon effect , 1993, Psychological research.

[39]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .