Post-2025 climate finance target: how much more and how much better?

ABSTRACT Formal deliberations for the new collective quantified goal on climate finance began at COP26 in Glasgow. This Perspectives article aims to inform this process by discussing the potential size and nature of is post-2025 target. We argue that the climate finance system around the current target to mobilise US$100 billion per year to support developing countries has been fraught with difficulties, and that it would be ineffective to simply increase the climate finance target without addressing these difficulties. Therefore, we identify and discuss five priority elements for negotiations: the relation to Article 2.1(c) of the Paris Agreement; the adaptation-mitigation balance; financial instruments; mobilising private finance; and ‘new and additional’ finance. To increase transparency, accountability, and trust in climate finance under the UNFCCC and to simultaneously allow for the mobilisation of finance at scale, we suggest setting a sub-target for grants. In combination with additional (sub)target(s), this could define an overall new collective quantified goal that is better suited to serve the challenging dual role of mobilising finance at scale and transferring resources to developing countries. Key policy insights Ambiguous definitions of climate finance and the US$100 billion target allow for multiple interpretations, reducing transparency and trust between countries. Climate finance targets can be interpreted in a dual and sometimes contrasting way: mobilising investment at scale and transferring resources from developed to developing countries. Recognising this duality may help to find common ground for a post-2025 climate finance target. Increasing the climate finance target may prove ineffective without further clarity on private finance mobilisation, the relation to Art. 2.1(c), and other priority elements. More detailed assessments of needs, priorities, costs, and support are needed to inform the post-2025 target and assess climate finance provision effectiveness. A sub-target for grants could increase accountability, trust, and transparency, and target the needs of the most vulnerable developing countries. Negotiations on the post-2025 climate finance target could also consider additional aspects such as access to and prioritisation of finance, and loss and damage.

[1]  Aggregate Trends of Climate Finance Provided and Mobilised by Developed Countries in 2013-2020 , 2022, Climate Finance and the USD 100 Billion Goal.

[2]  J. Corfee-Morlot,et al.  COVID-19 recovery and climate policy , 2021, Climate Policy.

[3]  J. Timperley.  The broken $100-billion promise of climate finance — and how to fix it , 2021, Nature.

[4]  A. Atteridge,et al.  Quantifying international public finance for climate change adaptation in Africa , 2021, Climate Policy.

[5]  Michael D. König,et al.  The climate consistency goal and the transformation of global finance , 2021, Nature Climate Change.

[6]  R. Mechler,et al.  Finance for Loss and Damage: a comprehensive risk analytical approach , 2021, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability.

[7]  J. Roberts,et al.  Rebooting a failed promise of climate finance , 2021, Nature Climate Change.

[8]  Climate Finance Provided and Mobilised by Developed Countries in 2013-18 , 2020, Climate Finance and the USD 100 Billion Goal.

[9]  Abrar S. Chaudhury.  Role of Intermediaries in Shaping Climate Finance in Developing Countries—Lessons from the Green Climate Fund , 2020, Sustainability.

[10]  J. Beirne,et al.  Feeling the Heat: Climate Risks and the Cost of Sovereign Borrowing , 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[11]  B. Sanderson,et al.  Assessing the costs of historical inaction on climate change , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[12]  M. Song,et al.  Co-financing in the green climate fund: lessons from the global environment facility , 2020 .

[13]  J. Roberts,et al.  Twenty-five years of adaptation finance through a climate justice lens , 2019, Climatic Change.

[14]  H. van Asselt,et al.  Subtle differentiation of countries’ responsibilities under the Paris Agreement , 2019, Palgrave Communications.

[15]  W. P. Pauw,et al.  Conditional nationally determined contributions in the Paris Agreement: foothold for equity or Achilles heel? , 2019, Making Climate Action More Effective.

[16]  Alexander Dobrinevski,et al.  Tracking finance flows towards assessing their consistency with climate objectives , 2019, OECD Environment Working Papers.

[17]  J. Roberts,et al.  The international climate finance accounting muddle: is there hope on the horizon? , 2019 .

[18]  V. Murinde,et al.  Climate Change and the Cost of Capital in Developing Countries , 2018 .

[19]  William M. Fonta,et al.  Africa and the Green Climate Fund: current challenges and future opportunities , 2018 .

[20]  J. Roberts,et al.  Financing loss and damage: reviewing options under the Warsaw International Mechanism , 2018 .

[21]  W. P. Pauw.  From public to private climate change adaptation finance : Adapting finance or financing adaptation? , 2017 .

[22]  Romain Weikmans,et al.  Assessing the credibility of how climate adaptation aid projects are categorised , 2017 .

[23]  J. Roberts,et al.  How Will We Pay for Loss and Damage? , 2017 .

[24]  C. Betzold,et al.  Special issue: managing fragmentation and complexity in the emerging system of international climate finance , 2017, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.

[25]  F. Jotzo,et al.  Sharing the Global Climate Finance Effort Fairly with Limited Coordination , 2015, Global Environmental Politics.

[26]  J. Roberts,et al.  Power in a Warming World: The New Global Politics of Climate Change and the Remaking of Environmental Inequality , 2015 .

[27]  Åsa Persson,et al.  Who is adaptation for? Vulnerability and adaptation benefits in proposals approved by the UNFCCC Adaptation Fund , 2015 .

[28]  D. Waskow,et al.  A new look at climate equity in the UNFCCC , 2014 .

[29]  D. Rübbelke.  International Support of Climate Change Policies in Developing Countries: Strategic, Moral and Fairness Aspects , 2010 .

[30]  Unedited and unformatted version Executive summary by the Standing Committee on Finance on the first report on the determination of the needs of developing country Parties related to implementing the Convention and the Paris Agreement , 2021 .

[31]  W. P. Pauw,et al.  Mobilising public and private co-finance , 2020 .

[32]  J. Blau.  The Paris Agreement , 2017 .

[33]  J. Roberts,et al.  Power in a Warming World , 2015 .

[34]  S. Nakhooda,et al.  What Counts: Tools to Help Define and Understand Progress Towards the $100 Billion Climate Finance Commitment , 2015 .

[35]  A. Halimanjaya,et al.  Mobilising International Climate Finance: Lessons from the Fast-Start Finance Period , 2013 .

[36]  R E Henderson,et al.  The gathering storm. , 1982, Journal of the Medical Association of the State of Alabama.