How Far Is Far Enough? A Measure of Information Privacy in Terms of Interpersonal Distance

Do average people have a sense of information privacy, and do they require others to understand and respect such privacy concerns? This research attempted to operationalize the measure of information privacy by using interpersonal distance as a unit of measurement. We collected data on the interpersonal distance among the automatic teller machine (ATM), add value machine (AVM; information privacy attached) and ticket vending machine (TVM; little information privacy attached) users. On-site observation revealed that the interpersonal distance between ATM users was larger than that between AVM users, and the interpersonal distance between AVM users was larger than that between TVM users, which suggested that the concept of information privacy (in terms of personal identification numbers, money, etc.) can be thus operationalized and measured. Moreover, on-site observation and interview revealed that desired distance was larger than the actual distance for both ATM and AVM users, which indicated that people's actual information privacy need is higher than that anticipated by others.

[1]  J. Phelps,et al.  Understanding privacy concerns , 1992 .

[2]  D Byrne,et al.  Attraction toward the opposite sex as a determinant of physical proximity. , 1973, The Journal of social psychology.

[3]  R. Shuter,et al.  A field study of nonverbal communication in Germany, Italy, and the United States , 1977 .

[4]  Masao Suzuki,et al.  The Experimental Study of the Effects of Seat Arrangement on One's Feelings , 1996 .

[5]  S. Worchel.  The influence of contextual variables on interpersonal spacing , 1986 .

[6]  “Is there something I should know?”: Topic avoidant responses in parent‐adolescent communication , 2004 .

[7]  G. Evans,et al.  Personal space. , 1973, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  Authoritarianism and interpersonal spacing behavior , 1984 .

[9]  Age Differences and Degree of Acquaintance as Determinants of Interpersonal Distance , 1974 .

[10]  Jessica J. Cameron,et al.  So close, and yet so far: does collectivism foster transparency overestimation? , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Donn Byrne,et al.  Too close for comfort : Sex differences in response to invasions of personal space , 1975 .

[12]  Margaret J. Weber,et al.  Influence of Sensory Abilities on the Interpersonal Distance of the Elderly , 2003 .

[13]  Declan T. Barry.  An Ethnic Identity Scale for East Asian Immigrants , 2002, Journal of Immigrant Health.

[14]  J. Freedman,et al.  Conceptions of Crowding. (Book Reviews: Crowding and Behavior; The Environment and Social Behavior. Privacy, Personal Space. Territory, Crowding) , 1975 .

[15]  Zhao Guo-dong,et al.  On Conceptual Analysis , 2008 .

[16]  John R. Aiello,et al.  Field Study of the Proxemic Behavior of Young School Children in Three Subcultural Groups. , 1971 .

[17]  A. Rüstemli.  Male and Female Personal Space Needs and Escape Reactions Under Intrusion: A Turkish Sample , 1986 .

[18]  Jennifer L. Huff.  Parental Attachment, Reverse Culture Shock, Perceived Social Support, and College Adjustment of Missionary Children , 2001 .

[19]  K. Sheehan,et al.  Flaming, Complaining, Abstaining: How Online Users Respond to Privacy Concerns , 1999 .

[20]  Y. Bar-Haim,et al.  Adult attachment style and interpersonal distance , 2004, Attachment & human development.

[21]  H. Leino‐Kilpi,et al.  Privacy: a review of the literature. , 2001, International journal of nursing studies.

[22]  How Close is Too Close? A Comparison of Proxemic Reactions of Singaporean Chinese to Male Intruders of Four Ethnicities , 2001, Perceptual and motor skills.

[23]  Methodological Factors Affecting Interpersonal Distance in Dyads , 1977 .

[24]  G. Long.  Psychological tension and closeness to others: stress and interpersonal distance preference. , 1984, The Journal of psychology.

[25]  Bruno S. Frey,et al.  In a field experiment , 2004 .

[26]  P. Bell,et al.  Privacy Preference and Interpersonal Distancing , 1983 .

[27]  Tamara Dinev,et al.  Internet privacy concerns and their antecedents - measurement validity and a regression model , 2004, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[28]  R. Gifford.  Projected Interpersonal Distance and Orientation Choices: Personality, Sex, and Social Situation , 1982 .

[29]  Effects of Heat, Noise, and Sex of Subject on a Projective Measure of Personal Space Permeability , 1984 .

[30]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  Privacy and Communication , 1982 .

[31]  N. Mukherjee,et al.  The effect of perceived cooperation on personal space requirements. , 1996, The Journal of social psychology.

[32]  A. Rüstemli,et al.  Crowding effects of density and interpersonal distance. , 1992, The Journal of social psychology.

[33]  Catherine Beaulieu,et al.  Intercultural Study of Personal Space: A Case Study , 2004 .

[34]  E. Hall,et al.  The Hidden Dimension , 1970 .

[35]  M. Cook.  Experiments on Orientation and Proxemics , 1970 .

[36]  D. M. Pedersen.  Privacy preferences and classroom seat selection , 1994 .

[37]  Estelle Michinov,et al.  The similarity–attraction relationship revisited: divergence between the affective and behavioral facets of attraction , 2002 .

[38]  Hal G. Gueutal,et al.  A Field Experiment Comparing Information-Privacy Values, Beliefs, and Attitudes Across Several Types of Organizations , 1983 .

[39]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  Status and privacy restoring communication in the workplace , 1992 .

[40]  T. Jones,et al.  Interpersonal distance, body orientation, and touch: effects of culture, gender, and age. , 1995, The Journal of social psychology.

[41]  I. Altman.  A Conceptual Analysis , 1976 .

[42]  J. Baxter.  Interpersonal spacing in natural settings. , 1970, Sociometry.

[43]  Feyzan Erkip,et al.  Invasion of personal space under the condition of short-term crowding : A case study on an automatic teller machine , 1999 .