The potential for British coastal shipping in a multimodal chain

A strategy to revitalize coastal shipping within Great Britain is investigated. An examination of the regulatory environment shows government, at both the EU and British levels, aware of the environmental benefits of coastal shipping compared to road freight transport, if only mildly supportive in tangible terms. The geography of Great Britain and the modern preference for just-in-time deliveries have severely restricted the ability of coastal shipping to compete effectively with road freight transport. The primary objective of the paper is to investigate whether coastal shipping could be integrated into a multimodal door-to-door supply chain, where it is currently hampered by high costs of transhipment, slow transport speeds, and the incongruity of load sizes between land and sea modes. Integration requires the co-operation of all organizations within the multi-modal supply chain. However, coastal shipping companies have been known to be individualistic and mistrusting of alliances. Therefore, a Delphi study is undertaken to investigate the standpoint of leading managers in such companies towards multimodal integration. The results of the Delphi study indicate that managers are in favour of multimodal developments, in particular cooperation between coastal shipping and road haulage. However, there was agreement that the business is highly competitive, and this may prevent the forms of collaboration required for multimodal systems. The secretive nature of the coastal shipping sector could impede joint marketing to promote a mode of transport that is often ‘invisible’ to shippers. There was little consensus on the relationship that should exist between coastal shipping and ports, a topic worthy of further investigation.

[1]  D. Hendrick,et al.  Introduction , 1998, Thorax.

[2]  James D Martin INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION, EVOLVING TOWARD THE 21ST CENTURY , 1996 .

[3]  Kenneth Primozic,et al.  LOGISTICS IS ABOUT STRATEGIC CHOICES. , 1995 .

[4]  J. W. Konings,et al.  INTEGRATED CENTRES FOR THE TRANSSHIPMENT, STORAGE, COLLECTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF GOODS: A SURVEY OF THE POSSIBILITIES FOR A HIGH- QUALITY INTERMODAL TRANSPORT CONCEPT. , 1996 .

[5]  N. Wijnolst,et al.  Analysis of the competitive position of short sea shipping: Development of policy measures , 1995 .

[6]  P. Panayides,et al.  An empirical assessment of relational competitive advantage in professional ship management , 1999 .

[7]  J Igielska AN ALTERNATIVE SYSTEM FOR SHORTSEA SHIPMENT OF ROAD VEHICLES , 1994 .

[8]  David H. Gustafson,et al.  Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes , 1976 .

[9]  J. Packer UK ROADS TO WATER INITIATIVE: A FOCUSING STUDY , 1994 .

[10]  John C. Taylor REMOVE BARRIERS TO INTERMODAL. , 1993 .

[11]  M ashimoto GENERAL APPROACH TO ENERGY PROBLEMS IN THE LAND TRANSPORT SECTOR IN JAPAN. ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN LAND TRANSPORT. PROCEEDINGS OF A SEMINAR ORGANISED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR ENERGY, LUXEMBOURG, MAY 16-18, 1988 , 1989 .

[12]  Snehamay Khasnabis,et al.  Impact of freight consolidation on logistics system performance , 1988 .

[13]  Abdel-Fattah Nabil,et al.  Road Freight and Privatisation , 1999 .

[14]  K Levander THE POTENTIAL FOR FAST SHIPS IN EUROPEAN FREIGHT TRANSPORT , 1993 .

[15]  R Ter Brugge,et al.  LOGISTIC REQUIREMENTS AND SHORTSEA SHIPPING , 1993 .

[16]  Glen M. D'Este,et al.  AN EVENT-BASED APPROACH TO MODELLING INTERMODAL FREIGHT SYSTEMS. IN: TRANSPORT LOGISTICS , 1993 .

[17]  Michael Grant,et al.  Indicators of the environmental impacts of transportation : highway, rail, aviation, and maritime transport , 1996 .

[18]  Lee Schipper,et al.  ENERGY USE AND CARBON EMISSIONS FROM FREIGHT IN 10 INDUSTRIALIZED COUNTRIES: AN ANALYSIS OF TRENDS FROM 1973 TO 1992 , 1997 .

[19]  F. Everard,et al.  THE SINGLE MARKET AND THE REMOVAL OF OBSTACLES TO THE GREATER USE OF SHORTSEA SHIPPING , 1994 .