A novel technique for multi-track percutaneous balloon mitral valvoplasty.

Percutaneous balloon mitral valvoplasty (PBMV) has become the treatment of choice for severe pliable rheumatic mitral stenosis. The multi-track system is a recent variation of the double-balloon technique and is easier owing to the use of a monorail balloon and a simple, single-guidewire approach. In the present study, we used the double-coil Inoue metal wire with a multi-track balloon instead of the conventional multi-track wire. We studied 62 consecutive patients (55 females) with significant symptomatic rheumatic mitral valve stenosis who underwent multi-track PBMV. Patients were randomized into 2 groups: the first group included 32 patients treated with the novel multi-track technique using the double-coil Inoue metal wire, and the second group included 30 patients treated with the conventional multi-track technique using a balloon endhole catheter and multi-track 0.035 inch stiff wire. None of the patients had cardiac tamponade, systemic thromboembolism, or any groin complications. No statistically significant differences were found between the 2 groups regarding any of the studied variables. There were no in-hospital deaths or complications necessitating emergent cardiac surgery in either group. In conclusion, this new technique with the double-coil Inoue metal wire achieves the double benefit of being as safe as (and indeed easier than) the conventional technique, and it utilizes fewer materials, making the multi-track system more cost-effective.

[1]  M. Fawzy Percutaneous mitral balloon valvotomy , 2007, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[2]  M. Gupta,et al.  Mitral valvuloplasty by inoue balloon under transthoracic echocardiographic guidance. , 2005, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[3]  Alec Vahanian,et al.  Percutaneous Approaches to Valvular Disease , 2004, Circulation.

[4]  P. Bonhoeffer,et al.  Percutaneous mitral valve dilatation with the multi‐track system , 1999, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[5]  S. Hammami,et al.  Percutaneous balloon versus surgical closed and open mitral commissurotomy: seven-year follow-up results of a randomized trial. , 1998, Circulation.

[6]  A. Cribier,et al.  Non-surgical mitral commissurotomy using metallic commissurotome. , 1998, Indian heart journal.

[7]  A. Cribier,et al.  Percutaneous mitral valvotomy with a metal dilatator , 1997, The Lancet.

[8]  J. Wynne,et al.  Percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty compared with open surgical commissurotomy for mitral stenosis. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  R. Arora,et al.  Immediate and long-term results of balloon and surgical closed mitral valvotomy: a randomized comparative study. , 1993, American heart journal.

[10]  C. Ruiz,et al.  Transseptal catheterization update 1992. , 1992, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[11]  B. T. le Roux,et al.  Balloon valvuloplasty versus closed commissurotomy for pliable mitral stenosis: a prospective hemodynamic study. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  J. Kirklin Percutaneous balloon versus surgical closed commissurotomy for mitral stenosis. , 1991, Circulation.

[13]  J. Wynne,et al.  Percutaneous Balloon Versus Surgical Closed Commissurotomy for Mitral Stenosis: A Prospective, Randomized Trial , 1991, Circulation.

[14]  I. Palacios,et al.  Percutaneous balloon dilatation of the mitral valve: an analysis of echocardiographic variables related to outcome and the mechanism of dilatation. , 1988, British heart journal.