How to get the timing right. A computational model of the effects of the timing of contacts on team cohesion in demographically diverse teams

Lau and Murnighan’s faultline theory explains negative effects of demographic diversity on team performance as consequence of strong demographic faultlines. If demographic differences between group members are correlated across various dimensions, the team is likely to show a “subgroup split” that inhibits communication and effective collaboration between team members. Our paper proposes a rigorous formal and computational reconstruction of the theory. Our model integrates four elementary mechanisms of social interaction, homophily, heterophobia, social influence and rejection into a computational representation of the dynamics of both opinions and social relations in the team. Computational experiments demonstrate that the central claims of faultline theory are consistent with the model. We show furthermore that the model highlights a new structural condition that may give managers a handle to temper the negative effects of strong demographic faultlines. We call this condition the timing of contacts. Computational analyses reveal that negative effects of strong faultlines critically depend on who is when brought in contact with whom in the process of social interactions in the team. More specifically, we demonstrate that faultlines have hardly negative effects when teams are initially split into demographically homogeneous subteams that are merged only when a local consensus has developed.

[1]  R. Ralph,et al.  Social Pressures in Informal Groups. , 1951 .

[2]  W. Goodenough,et al.  Human Group , 1951, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining. 2nd Ed..

[3]  J. E. Fleming The Human Group. By George C. Homans. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co. 484 pp. $6.00 , 1951 .

[4]  Morroe Berger,et al.  Freedom and control in modern society , 1954 .

[5]  Kullervo Rainio STOCHASTIC PROCESS OF SOCIAL CONTACTS , 1961 .

[6]  J Tudor-Hart,et al.  On the nature of prejudice. , 1961, The Eugenics review.

[7]  Kullervo Rainio,et al.  A Stochastic Theory of Social Contacts: A Laboratory Study and an Application to Sociometry. , 1962 .

[8]  Kullervo Rainio A stochastic model of social interaction , 1962 .

[9]  Harold Gulliksen,et al.  Contributions to mathematical psychology , 1964 .

[10]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Friendship as Social process: a substantive and methodological analysis , 1964 .

[11]  Kullervo Rainio Social Interaction as a Stochastic Learning Process , 1965, European Journal of Sociology.

[12]  E. Rogers,et al.  HOMOPHILY-HETEROPHILY: RELATIONAL CONCEPTS FOR COMMUNICATION RESEARCH , 1970 .

[13]  D. Byrne The Attraction Paradigm , 1971 .

[14]  Charles R. Plott,et al.  Agenda Influence and its Implications , 1977 .

[15]  E LevineMichael,et al.  Agenda Influence and Its Implications , 1977 .

[16]  C. Plott,et al.  A Model of Agenda Influence on Committee Decisions , 1978 .

[17]  D. Kandel Homophily, Selection, and Socialization in Adolescent Friendships , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[18]  A. Vinokur,et al.  Depolarization of attitudes in groups. , 1978 .

[19]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Organizational Demography: Implications for Management , 1985 .

[20]  D. Isenberg Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. , 1986 .

[21]  G. Clore,et al.  The attraction hypothesis: do similar attitudes affect anything? , 1986 .

[22]  Milton E. Rosenbaum,et al.  The repulsion hypothesis: On the nondevelopment of relationships. , 1986 .

[23]  Milton E. Rosenbaum,et al.  Comment on a proposed two-stage theory of relationship formation: first, repulsion. Then, attraction , 1986 .

[24]  Donn Byrne,et al.  The repulsion hypothesis revisited: Similarity irrelevance or dissimilarity bias? , 1989 .

[25]  Tatsuya Kameda,et al.  Procedural influence in two-step group decision making : power of local majorities in consensus formation , 1995 .

[26]  L. H. Pelled Demographic Diversity, Conflict, and Work Group Outcomes: An Intervening Process Theory , 1996 .

[27]  Frances J. Milliken,et al.  Searching for Common Threads: Understanding the Multiple Effects of Diversity in Organizational Groups , 1996 .

[28]  J. Lydon,et al.  The Relative Effect of Attitude Similarity and Attitude Dissimilarity on Interpersonal Attraction: Investigating the Moderating Roles of Prejudice and Group Membership , 1997 .

[29]  Sigal G. Barsade,et al.  Being Different Yet Feeling Similar: The Influence Of Demographic Composition And Organizational Culture On Work Processes And Outcomes , 1998 .

[30]  T. Pettigrew Intergroup contact theory. , 1998, Annual review of psychology.

[31]  J. K. Murnighan,et al.  Demographic Diversity and Faultlines: The Compositional DYnamics of Organizational Groups , 1998 .

[32]  G. Northcraft,et al.  You have printed the following article : Why Differences Make a Difference : A Field Study of Diversity , Conflict , and Performance in Workgroups , 2007 .

[33]  James A. Pharmer,et al.  When Member Homogeneity is Needed in Work Teams , 2000 .

[34]  C. Earley,et al.  Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. , 2000 .

[35]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[36]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  Networks, Diversity, and Productivity: The Social Capital of Corporate R&D Teams , 2001 .

[37]  S. Webber,et al.  Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: a meta-analysis , 2001 .

[38]  Rainer Hegselmann,et al.  Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation , 2002, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[39]  D. Kenrick,et al.  Repulsion or attraction? Group membership and assumed attitude similarity. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  Ryuhei Tsuji Interpersonal influence and attitude change toward conformity in small groups: A social psychological model , 2002 .

[41]  James Moody,et al.  The Importance of Relationship Timing for Diffusion , 2002 .

[42]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  Cracks in Diversity Research: The Effects of Diversity Faultlines on Conflict and Performance , 2003 .

[43]  Cristina B. Gibson,et al.  A Healthy Divide: Subgroups as a Stimulus for Team Learning Behavior , 2003 .

[44]  M. Macy Polarization in Dynamic Networks : A Hopfield Model of Emergent Structure , 2003 .

[45]  Noah Mark,et al.  Culture and Competition: Homophily and distancing Explanations for Cultural Niches , 2003, American Sociological Review.

[46]  Christian List,et al.  A Model of Path-Dependence in Decisions over Multiple Propositions , 2002, American Political Science Review.

[47]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Taking Stock of Networks and Organizations: A Multilevel Perspective , 2004 .

[48]  N. Kerr,et al.  Group performance and decision making. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[49]  G. Weisbuch,et al.  Persuasion dynamics , 2004, cond-mat/0410200.

[50]  K. Bezrukova,et al.  A field study of group diversity, workgroup context, and performance , 2004 .

[51]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis: Workshop Summary and Papers , 2004 .

[52]  J. K. Murnighan,et al.  Interactions Within Groups and Subgroups: The Effects of Demographic Faultlines , 2005 .

[53]  Eric Molleman,et al.  Diversity in Demographic Characteristics, Abilities and Personality Traits: Do Faultlines Affect Team Functioning? , 2005 .

[54]  David R. Gibson Concurrency and Commitment: Network Scheduling and Its Consequences for Diffusion , 2005 .

[55]  Wander Jager,et al.  Uniformity, Bipolarization and Pluriformity Captured as Generic Stylized Behavior with an Agent-Based Simulation Model of Attitude Change , 2005, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[56]  Andreas Flache,et al.  Why more contact may increase cultural polarization , 2006, physics/0604196.

[57]  G. Stewart A Meta-Analytic Review of Relationships Between Team Design Features and Team Performance , 2006 .

[58]  Andreas Flache,et al.  What sustains cultural diversity and what undermines it? Axelrod and beyond , 2006 .

[59]  Laurent Salzarulo,et al.  A Continuous Opinion Dynamics Model Based on the Principle of Meta-Contrast , 2006, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[60]  James A. Kitts,et al.  Social influence and the emergence of norms amid ties of amity and enmity , 2006, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[61]  C. Mason Exploring the Processes Underlying Within-Group Homogeneity , 2006 .

[62]  Michael W. Macy,et al.  What Sustains Stable Cultural Diversity and What Undermines It? Axelrod and beyond. Peer review. , 2006 .

[63]  Andreas Flache,et al.  Why do faultlines matter? A computational model of how strong demographic faultlines undermine team cohesion , 2008, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.