Decoding movement-related cortical potentials from electrocorticography.

OBJECT Control signals for brain-machine interfaces may be obtained from a variety of sources, each with their own relative merits. Electrocorticography (ECoG) provides better spatial and spectral resolution than scalp electroencephalography and does not include the risks attendant upon penetration of the brain parenchyma associated with single and multiunit recordings. For these reasons, subdural electrode recordings have been proposed as useful primary or adjunctive control signals for brain-machine interfaces. The goal of the present study was to determine if 2D control signals could be decoded from ECoG. METHODS Six patients undergoing invasive monitoring for medically intractable epilepsy using subdural grid electrodes were asked to perform a motor task involving moving a joystick in 1 of 4 cardinal directions (up, down, left, or right) and a fifth condition ("trigger"). Evoked activity was synchronized to joystick movement and analyzed in the theta, alpha, beta, gamma, and high-gamma frequency bands. RESULTS Movement-related cortical potentials could be accurately differentiated from rest with very high accuracy (83-96%). Further distinguishing the movement direction (up, down, left, or right) could also be resolved with high accuracy (58-86%) using information only from the high-gamma range, whereas distinguishing the trigger condition from the remaining directions provided better accuracy. CONCLUSIONS Two-dimensional control signals can be derived from ECoG. Local field potentials as measured by ECoG from subdural grids will be useful as control signals for a brain-machine interface.

[1]  Dawn M. Taylor,et al.  Direct Cortical Control of 3D Neuroprosthetic Devices , 2002, Science.

[2]  R. Adolphs,et al.  Electrophysiological Responses in the Human Amygdala Discriminate Emotion Categories of Complex Visual Stimuli , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  G. Buzsáki Large-scale recording of neuronal ensembles , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  Jon A. Mukand,et al.  Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia , 2006, Nature.

[5]  G. Schalk,et al.  The emerging world of motor neuroprosthetics: a neurosurgical perspective. , 2006, Neurosurgery.

[6]  C. Raftopoulos,et al.  SUBDURAL MOTOR CORTEX STIMULATION FOR CENTRAL AND PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHIC PAIN: A LONG‐TERM FOLLOW‐UP STUDY IN A SERIES OF EIGHT PATIENTS , 2008, Neurosurgery.

[7]  M. M. Morrow,et al.  Direct comparison of the task-dependent discharge of M1 in hand space and muscle space. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Andrew B Schwartz,et al.  Cortical neural prosthetics. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[9]  Arthur Gretton,et al.  Inferring spike trains from local field potentials. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Andrew S. Whitford,et al.  Cortical control of a prosthetic arm for self-feeding , 2008, Nature.

[11]  David M. Santucci,et al.  Learning to Control a Brain–Machine Interface for Reaching and Grasping by Primates , 2003, PLoS biology.

[12]  P. Kennedy,et al.  Restoration of neural output from a paralyzed patient by a direct brain connection , 1998, Neuroreport.

[13]  J.A. Wilson,et al.  A cortical recording platform utilizing μECoG electrode arrays , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[14]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.

[15]  Shamim Nemati,et al.  Biomimetic Brain Machine Interfaces for the Control of Movement , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  G. Schalk,et al.  ECoG factors underlying multimodal control of a brain-computer interface , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[17]  Andrew B. Schwartz,et al.  Brain-Controlled Interfaces: Movement Restoration with Neural Prosthetics , 2006, Neuron.

[18]  S. Meagher Instant neural control of a movement signal , 2002 .

[19]  Miriam Zacksenhouse,et al.  Cortical Ensemble Adaptation to Represent Velocity of an Artificial Actuator Controlled by a Brain-Machine Interface , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Gerwin Schalk,et al.  A brain–computer interface using electrocorticographic signals in humans , 2004, Journal of neural engineering.

[21]  R A Normann,et al.  The Utah intracortical Electrode Array: a recording structure for potential brain-computer interfaces. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[22]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces in neurological rehabilitation , 2008, The Lancet Neurology.

[23]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Decoding two-dimensional movement trajectories using electrocorticographic signals in humans , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[24]  Lee E Miller,et al.  Prediction of upper limb muscle activity from motor cortical discharge during reaching , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[25]  C. Mehring,et al.  Differential Representation of Arm Movement Direction in Relation to Cortical Anatomy and Function , 2008 .

[26]  Blake W. Johnson,et al.  Mu rhythm modulation during observation of an object-directed grasp. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[27]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Spectral Changes in Cortical Surface Potentials during Motor Movement , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  Jonathan R Wolpaw,et al.  Control of a two-dimensional movement signal by a noninvasive brain-computer interface in humans. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  E. Donchin,et al.  Relationship between P300 amplitude and subsequent recall for distinctive events: dependence on type of distinctiveness attribute. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[30]  J. T. Massey,et al.  Mental rotation of the neuronal population vector. , 1989, Science.