HIGH-ACCURACY PHOTOGRAMMETRIC TECHNIQUE FOR HUMAN SPINE MEASUREMENT

Close range photogrammetry has been recognised as an essential tool for the capture of high-accuracy spatial data for medical applications, in particular work involving dynamic human body parts such as limbs. Offline and online photogrammetric systems are readily available for a number of common applications. However, off-the-shelf systems are not always appropriate because of project site conditions. To achieve high measurement accuracy in a field environment, a modified field camera calibration technique was introduced. The technique is particularly important where each camera is limited to one captured image during calibration, as the camera and the calibration testfield are in fixed positions. In this paper a custom-built imaging system designed for the study of the human spine in an outdoor environment is introduced. The discussion addresses: (1) imaging system design; (2) modified field calibration techniques; and (3) a case study on human spines. Two field camera calibration techniques were evaluated, both of which improved the accuracy of the prototype system, the use of a detachable target board offering the best results. This modified camera calibration procedure has improved the 3D measurement accuracy from 1AE25 ± 0AE 3m m to 0AE43 ± 0AE1 mm. The improvement is at a level achievable in the laboratory. The technique is considered to provide accurate and reliable anthropometric landmark measurement at low cost. This was evaluated in a clinical setting where diurnal changes in spine length and contour were measured in a cohort of 30 university students. The capability of the technique to measure sagittal and frontal angular changes provides a novel way of examining changes in spine shape.

[1]  C. Fraser,et al.  Digital camera calibration methods: Considerations and comparisons , 2006 .

[2]  N E Fowler,et al.  Repeatability of measurement in determining stature in sitting and standing postures , 2001, Ergonomics.

[3]  Nelson G. Durdle,et al.  Calibration of video cameras for scoliosis mapping , 1993 .

[4]  Halim Setan,et al.  Photogrammetry and 3D laser scanning as spatial data capture techniques for a national craniofacial database , 2005 .

[5]  J D Troup,et al.  Circadian Variation in Stature and the Effects of Spinal Loading , 1985, Spine.

[6]  A. Chong,et al.  Underwater Digital Stereo-Observation Technique for Red Hydrocoral Study , 2002 .

[7]  Albert K. Chong,et al.  Recent Practical Applications of Close-range Photogrammetry for Complex Motion Study , 2008 .

[8]  S M McGill,et al.  Studies of spinal shrinkage to evaluate low-back loading in the workplace. , 1996, Ergonomics.

[9]  S M McGill,et al.  Stadiometry: on measurement technique to reduce variability in spine shrinkage measurement. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[10]  N. Fowler,et al.  Changes in stature during and after spinal traction in young male subjects , 2007 .

[11]  Stuart Robson,et al.  Close Range Photogrammetry , 2007 .

[12]  Thomas Reilly,et al.  Effects of loading on spinal shrinkage in males of different age groups. , 2006, Applied ergonomics.

[13]  L Susak,et al.  Diurnal Changes in the Profile Shape and Range of Motion of the Back , 1992, Spine.

[14]  R. Stretch,et al.  Cricket injuries: a longitudinal study of the nature of injuries to South African cricketers , 2003 .

[15]  Fiona Berryman,et al.  A new system for measuring three-dimensional back shape in scoliosis , 2008, European Spine Journal.

[16]  F. A. Heuvel,et al.  Development of a Robust Photogrammetric Metrology System for Monitoring the Healing of Bedsores , 2005 .

[17]  J D Troup,et al.  Running speed and spinal shrinkage in runners with and without low back pain. , 1990, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[18]  Albert K. Chong,et al.  Near infrared photography for craniofacial anthropometric landmark measurement , 2006 .

[19]  Mj Grenness,et al.  Mapping tooth surface loss with a fixed‐base stereo camera , 2008 .

[20]  M. Pope,et al.  Spine height and disc height changes as the effect of hyperextension using stadiometry and MRI. , 2004, The Iowa orthopaedic journal.

[21]  C J Snijders,et al.  Relationship between everyday activities and spinal shrinkage. , 2005, Clinical biomechanics.

[22]  Clive S. Fraser,et al.  The metric impact of reduction optics in digital cameras , 1996 .

[23]  J. Fryer,et al.  Metric capabilities of low‐cost digital cameras for close range surface measurement , 2005 .

[24]  A. W. Burner,et al.  Photogrammetry Applied to Wind Tunnel Testing , 2000 .

[25]  P. Trott,et al.  Effects of chronic low back pain, age and gender on vertical spinal creep , 2003, Ergonomics.

[26]  H Labelle,et al.  Reconstruction of Laser-scanned 3D Torso Topography and Stereoradiographical Spine and Rib-cage Geometry in Scoliosis , 2001, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[27]  T. Clarke,et al.  The Development of Camera Calibration Methods and Models , 1998 .

[28]  A. Mannion,et al.  A new skin-surface device for measuring the curvature and global and segmental ranges of motion of the spine: reliability of measurements and comparison with data reviewed from the literature , 2004, European Spine Journal.

[29]  R J Jefferson,et al.  An analysis of normal back shape measured by ISIS scanning. , 1991, Spine.

[30]  H. Beyer Geometric and radiometric analysis of a CCD-camera based photogrammetric close-range system , 1992 .