Temporal context effects in pigeons' memory for event duration

Abstract These experiments extend previous studies of how pigeons' memory for the duration of events is affected by the length of the delay and intertrial intervals. Pigeons were trained using a delayed matching-to-sample procedure to peck one color following a long sample and another color following a short sample. Experiments 1a and 1b tested a prediction, derived from the relative duration hypothesis, that systematic errors in response to delay manipulations should be greater in the context of a short intertrial interval than in the context of a long one. Pigeons were given delay tests in the context of either 10-s or 60-s intertrial intervals. Systematic errors in response to delay manipulations were of greater magnitude in the context of the 10-s intertrial interval, as predicted by the relative duration hypothesis. Experiments 2a and 2b examined whether stable delay and intertrial intervals during training are important for the development of a temporal reference memory. Variability in the intertrial or delay interval during training had only minor effects on acquisition and did not affect pigeons' tendency to make systematic errors in response to subsequent manipulations of these intervals. Moreover, even during acquisition, birds trained with variable delays showed a systematic increase in the tendency to make choices appropriate to the short sample as a function of the training delay, with the least bias occurring at an intermediate delay. Thus, reference memory appeared to be based on an average of the delays experienced during training.

[1]  Donald M. Wilkie,et al.  Subjective shortening: A model of pigeons' memory for event duration. , 1983 .

[2]  R. Church,et al.  Bisection of temporal intervals. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[3]  Russell M. Church,et al.  Short-term memory for time intervals , 1980 .

[4]  D. Wilkie,et al.  Discriminal distance analysis supports the hypothesis that pigeons retrospectively encode event duration , 1990 .

[5]  M. Spetch,et al.  Proactive Effects in Pigeons' Memory for Event Duration: Evidence for Analogical Retention , 1989 .

[6]  Jerome S. Cohen,et al.  Timing light and tone signals in pigeons. , 1989 .

[7]  A. Stubbs The discrimination of stimulus duration by pigeons. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[8]  M. Spetch Systematic errors in pigeons’ memory for event duration: Interaction between training and test delay , 1987 .

[9]  P. Kraemer,et al.  The choose-short effect in pigeon memory for stimulus duration: Subjective shortening versus coding models , 1985 .

[10]  C. Gallistel The organization of learning , 1990 .

[11]  Pervasiveness and magnitude of context effects: Evidence for the relativity of absolute magnitude estimation , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  S. Roberts,et al.  Comparison of timing and classical conditioning. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[13]  R. C. Tees,et al.  Effects of intertrial reinforcers on rats' timing behavior , 1988, Behavioural Processes.

[14]  R M Church,et al.  Scalar Timing in Memory , 1984, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[15]  M. Spetch,et al.  Pigeons’ memory for event duration: Intertrial interval and delay effects , 1989 .

[16]  J E Staddon,et al.  Time and memory. , 1984, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[17]  John R. Platt,et al.  Bisection of temporal intervals by pigeons. , 1983 .

[18]  P. Killeen,et al.  A behavioral theory of timing , 1988 .

[19]  D A Stubbs,et al.  Scaling of stimulus duration by pigeons. , 1976, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[20]  P. Balsam Relative Time in Trace Conditioning , 1984, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[21]  P. Kraemer,et al.  Some observations of the effects of intertrial interval and delay on delayed matching to sample in pigeons. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[22]  S. Roberts,et al.  Effect of classical conditioning on an internal clock. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[23]  G. A. Lucas,et al.  US duration and local trial spacing affect autoshaped responding , 1982 .

[24]  J. Fetterman,et al.  Discrimination of duration ratios. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[25]  J. Fetterman,et al.  Short-term memory for responses: the "choose-small" effect. , 1989, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.