A Bayesian Multiplicative Markov Random Field Model for Determining Activated Areas in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies

A Bayesian spatial model for detecting brain activation in functional neuroimaging (here focusing on functional magnetic resonance imaging [fMRI]) is developed that inherently trades the local functional response level with its spatial extent. The model makes no assumptions about the shape or form of activated areas, except that they are elevated above non-active areas and form contiguous regions as characterized by Markov random field prior distributions. The robustness of the model is tested under a variety of simulated conditions and the model is subsequently applied to real data from an auditory experiment. An observed secondary low-level response that occurs globally and is synchronized with the experimental stimulus necessitates an extension to the model in the form of an additional additive Markov random field. Functional magnetic resonance imaging has been playing a major role in neuroscience for more than a decade. A whole range of statistical methods have been developed and adapted in order to analyze the highly multivariate datasets that are obtained from fMRI experiments. Initially, these approaches were adapted from existing ones for detecting activated areas in Positron Emission Tomography experiments. However, subsequent methods have been developed that are tailored specifically for fMRI. Most of these methods tend to focus on performing a separate analysis (e.g. linear model or parametric curve fitting) at each voxel (3D pixel) in order to determine the existence or not of a localized brain response to an experimental stimulus. The subsequent spatial stage of these analysis methods tend to focus on determining a level at which to threshold a 3D map of, for example estimated magnitudes, such that the large number of multiple comparisons is accounted for. A spatial map showing above-threshold voxels is then usually displayed as a map of activation. Instead of level thresholding the map of statistics, we develop a Bayesian product Markov random field model that places a priori expected constraints on the smoothness of activation patterns. The presence of local activation is then dependent not only on the level of a statistic at a particular voxel, but also on both the level of the statistics at nearby voxels and the classification as either “active” or “inactive” of those same voxels. The main benefit of this approach is that the Bayesian spatial prior distributions provide a framework for detecting active regions much as a neurologist might; based on posterior evidence over a wide range of spatial scales, simultaneously considering the level of the voxel magnitudes along with the size of the elevated area.

[1]  N. Hartvig,et al.  A Stochastic Geometry Model for Functional Magnetic Resonance Images , 2002 .

[2]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Classical and Bayesian Inference in Neuroimaging: Theory , 2002, NeuroImage.

[3]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Classical and Bayesian Inference in Neuroimaging: Applications , 2002, NeuroImage.

[4]  Jagath C. Rajapakse,et al.  Bayesian approach to segmentation of statistical parametric maps , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  V. D. Oliveira,et al.  Bayesian prediction of clipped Gaussian random fields , 2000 .

[6]  Christopher R. Genovese,et al.  A Bayesian Time-Course Model for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data , 2000 .

[7]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  The Construction of Multivariate Distributions from Markov Random Fields , 2000 .

[8]  Xavier Descombes,et al.  A Markov Pixon Information Approach for Low-Level Image Description , 1999, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[9]  Anthony N. Pettitt,et al.  Spatial modelling for binary data using␣a␣hidden conditional autoregressive Gaussian process: a multivariate extension of the probit model , 1999, Stat. Comput..

[10]  Xavier Descombes,et al.  Spatio-temporal fMRI analysis using Markov random fields , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Håkon Tjelmeland,et al.  Markov Random Fields with Higher‐order Interactions , 1998 .

[12]  M. Hallett Human Brain Function , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[13]  I. Weir Fully Bayesian Reconstructions from Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography Data , 1997 .

[14]  L. Baxter Random Fields on a Network: Modeling, Statistics, and Applications , 1996 .

[15]  J. Besag,et al.  On conditional and intrinsic autoregressions , 1995 .

[16]  Walter R. Gilks,et al.  MCMC in image analysis , 1995 .

[17]  J. Besag,et al.  Bayesian Computation and Stochastic Systems , 1995 .

[18]  Gerhard Winkler,et al.  Image analysis, random fields and dynamic Monte Carlo methods: a mathematical introduction , 1995, Applications of mathematics.

[19]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data, Revised Edition. , 1994 .

[20]  K. Worsley,et al.  Local Maxima and the Expected Euler Characteristic of Excursion Sets of χ 2, F and t Fields , 1994, Advances in Applied Probability.

[21]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent , 1994, Human brain mapping.

[22]  J. Besag,et al.  Bayesian image restoration, with two applications in spatial statistics , 1991 .

[23]  B. Ripley Statistical inference for spatial processes , 1990 .

[24]  J. Besag Spatial Interaction and the Statistical Analysis of Lattice Systems , 1974 .