An analytical model to predict the natural frequency of offshore wind turbines on three-spring flexible foundations using two different beam models

In this study an analytical model of offshore wind turbines (OWTs) supported on flexible foundation is presented to provide a fast and reasonably accurate natural frequency estimation suitable for preliminary design or verification of Finite Element calculations. Previous research modelled the problem using Euler–Bernoulli beam model where the foundation is represented by two springs (lateral and rotational). In contrast, this study improves on previous efforts by incorporating a cross-coupling stiffness thereby modelling the foundation using three springs. Furthermore, this study also derives the natural frequency using Timoshenko beam model by including rotary inertia and shear deformation. The results of the proposed model are also compared with measured values of the natural frequency of four OWTs obtained from the literature. The results show that the Timoshenko beam model does not improve the results significantly and the slender beam assumption may be sufficient. The cross-coupling spring term has a significant effect on the natural frequency therefore needs to be included in the analysis. The model predicts the natural frequency of existing turbines with reasonable accuracy.

[1]  D. Muir Wood,et al.  Observed dynamic soil–structure interaction in scale testing of offshore wind turbine foundations , 2013 .

[2]  S. Timoshenko,et al.  LXVI. On the correction for shear of the differential equation for transverse vibrations of prismatic bars , 1921 .

[3]  N. G. Stephen,et al.  The second spectrum of Timoshenko beam theory - Further assessment , 2006 .

[4]  Subhamoy Bhattacharya,et al.  Similitude relationships for physical modelling of monopile-supported offshore wind turbines , 2011 .

[5]  N. G. Stephena,et al.  On the valid frequency range of Timoshenko beam theory , 2006 .

[6]  Samuel G. Paikowsky,et al.  Scale Effects in Lateral Load Response of Large Diameter Monopiles , 2007 .

[7]  Subhamoy Bhattacharya,et al.  Dynamic Analysis of Wind Turbine Towers on Flexible Foundations , 2012 .

[8]  David-Pieter Molenaar,et al.  Wind Turbine Structural Dynamics – A Review of the Principles for Modern Power Generation, Onshore and Offshore , 2002 .

[9]  Subhamoy Bhattacharya,et al.  Vibrations of wind-turbines considering soil-structure interaction , 2011 .

[10]  Subhamoy Bhattacharya,et al.  Dynamics of offshore wind turbines supported on two foundations , 2013 .

[11]  George Gazetas,et al.  Seismic response of end-bearing single piles , 1984 .

[12]  Cen.  Foundations, retaining structures and geotechnical aspects , 2003 .

[13]  L. Majkut,et al.  Free and forced vibrations of Timoshenko beams described by single difference equation , 2009 .

[14]  Subhamoy Bhattacharya,et al.  Experimental validation of soil–structure interaction of offshore wind turbines , 2011 .

[15]  S. Timoshenko,et al.  X. On the transverse vibrations of bars of uniform cross-section , 1922 .

[16]  Subhamoy Bhattacharya,et al.  Dynamic soil–structure interaction of monopile supported wind turbines in cohesive soil , 2013 .