Locutionary, Illocutionary, Perlocutionary

J. L. Austin's three-prong distinction between locutionary, illocutionary and perlocutionary acts is discussed in terms of D. Davidson's theory of action. Perlocutionary acts refer to the relation between the utterance and its causal effects on the addressee. In contrast, illocutionary and locutionary acts are alternative descriptions of the utterance. The possibility of conceiving of locutionary acts as expressing propositions under a certain mode of presentation is discussed. Different ways to define illocutionary acts without encroaching on the locutionary or perlocutionary territory are considered. © 2008 The Authors Journal Compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

[1]  K. Bach The Excluded Middle: Semantic Minimalism without Minimal Propositions , 2006 .

[2]  K. Reeder The emergence of illocutionary skills , 1980, Journal of Child Language.

[3]  P. Strawson Intention and Convention in Speech Acts , 1964 .

[4]  Yueguo Gu The impasse of perlocution , 1993 .

[5]  J. Searle Austin on Locutionary and Illocutionary Acts , 1968 .

[6]  J. Searle Intentionality: Name index , 1983 .

[7]  John Searle: The Limits of Expressibility , 2002 .

[8]  R. Carston Thoughts and Utterances , 2002 .

[9]  Martin Montminy,et al.  Semantic Content, Truth Conditions and Context , 2006 .

[10]  Barbara Read,et al.  Preschool children's production of directive forms∗ , 1978 .

[11]  Billy Clark,et al.  Relevance and “pseudo-imperatives” , 1993 .

[12]  Marilyn Shatz,et al.  On the development of communicative understandings: An early strategy for interpreting and responding to messages , 1978, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  S. Soames Naming and Asserting , 2005 .

[14]  F. Récanati The Pragmatics of What is Said , 1989 .

[15]  S. Neale Paul Grice and the philosophy of language , 1992 .

[16]  Mikhail Kissine,et al.  From predictions to promises: how to derive deontic commitment , 2008 .

[17]  Marina Sbisà,et al.  HOW TO READ AUSTIN , 2007 .

[18]  H. Wimmer,et al.  “John thinks that Mary thinks that…” attribution of second-order beliefs by 5- to 10-year-old children ☆ , 1985 .

[19]  M. Prior,et al.  Can autistic children distinguish lies from jokes? A second look at second-order belief attribution. , 1994, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[20]  Daniela K. O'Neill,et al.  Two‐Year‐Old Children's Sensitivity to a Parent's Knowledge State When Making Requests , 1996 .