Estimating the saturated hydraulic conductivity in a spatially variable soil with different permeameters: a stochastic Kozeny-Carman relation

The spatial variability of the saturated hydraulic conductivity ( Ks) of a greenhouse banana plantation volcanic soil was investigated with three different permeameters: (a) the Philip-Dunne field permeameter, an easy to implement and low cost device; (b) the Guelph field permeameter; (c) the constant head laboratory permeameter. Ks was measured on a 14× 5 array of 2. 5m ×5 m rectangles at 0.15 m depth using the above three methods. Ks differences obtained with the different permeameters are explained in terms of flow dimensionality and elementary volume explored by the three methods. A sinusoidal spatial variation of Ks was coincident with the underlying alignment of banana plants on the field. This was explained in terms of soil disturbances, such as soil compaction, originated by management practices and tillage. Soil salinity showed some coincidence in space with the hydraulic conductivity, because of the irrigation system distribution, but a causal relationship between the two is however difficult to support. To discard the possibility of an artefact, the original 70 point mesh was doubled by intercalation of a second 14 × 5 grid, such that the laboratory Ks was finally determined on a 140 points 2 . 5m × 2.5 m square grid. Far from diluting such anisotropy this was further strengthened after inclusion of the new 70 points. The porosity ( φ) determined on the same laboratory cores shows a similar sigmoid trend, thus pointing towards a plausible explanation for such variability. A power-law relationship was found between saturated hydraulic conductivity and porosity, Ksαφ n (r 2 = 0.38), as stated by the Kozeny–Carman relation. A statistical reformulation of the Kozeny–Carman relation is proposed that both improved its predictability potential and allows comparisons between different representative volumes, or Ks data sets with different origin. Although the two-field methods: Guelph and Philip-Dunne, also follow a similar alignment trend, this is not so evident, suggesting that additional factors affect Ks measured in the field. Finally, geostatistical techniques such as cross correlograms estimation are used to further investigate this spatial dependence. © 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  G. Burtin,et al.  Disaggregation and clay dispersion of Oxisols: Na resin, a recommended methodology , 1991 .

[2]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data. , 1992 .

[3]  E. Fereres,et al.  Analysis of Infiltration and Runoff in an Olive Orchard under No-Till , 2001 .

[4]  L. D. Whittig,et al.  X-Ray Diffraction Techniques , 2018, SSSA Book Series.

[5]  E. Fernández‐Caldas,et al.  Influence of Silica Content on the Surface Charge Characteristics of Allophanic Clays , 1982 .

[6]  A. R. Socorro,et al.  Time domain reflectometry models as a tool to understand the dielectric response of volcanic soils , 2003 .

[7]  David E. Elrick,et al.  Infiltration from Constant‐Head Well Permeameters and Infiltrometers , 1992 .

[8]  Gedeon Dagan,et al.  Statistical analysis of salinity and texture effects on spatial variability of soil hydraulic conductivity , 1984 .

[9]  Walter J. Rawls,et al.  USE OF SOIL TEXTURE, BULK DENSITY, AND SLOPE OF THE WATER RETENTION CURVE TO PREDICT SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY , 1998 .

[10]  J. Roger-Estrade,et al.  Porosity and soil water properties of Caribbean volcanic ash soils , 2000 .

[11]  Daniel Hillel,et al.  Applications of soil physics , 1980 .

[12]  Rafael Muñoz-Carpena,et al.  FIELD EVALUATION OF THE NEW PHILIP-DUNNE PERMEAMETER FOR MEASURING SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY , 2002 .

[13]  D. Bosch,et al.  Hydraulic conductivity variability for two sandy soils , 1998 .

[14]  I C Edmundson,et al.  Particle size analysis , 2013 .

[15]  D. Elrick,et al.  Hydraulic Conductivity Measurements in the Unsaturated Zone Using Improved Well Analyses , 1989 .

[16]  C. Dirksen,et al.  Hydraulic Conductivity and Diffusivity: Laboratory Methods , 2018, SSSA Book Series.

[17]  P. Basak SOIL STRUCTURE AND ITS EFFECTS ON HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY , 1972 .

[18]  W. Reynolds,et al.  Hydraulic Conductivity in a Clay Soil: Two Measurement Techniques and Spatial Characterization , 1996 .

[19]  L. Ahuja,et al.  Use of Brooks-Corey Parameters to Improve Estimates of Saturated Conductivity from Effective Porosity , 1999 .

[20]  R. Webster,et al.  Statistical Methods in Soil and Land Resource Survey. , 1990 .

[21]  P. Rousseeuw,et al.  Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics , 2005 .

[22]  A. Amoozegar,et al.  Hydraulic Conductivity of Saturated Soils: Field Methods , 2018, SSSA Book Series.

[23]  Laj R. Ahuja,et al.  Macroporosity to characterize spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity and effects of land management , 1984 .

[24]  A. Newman The specific surface of soils determined by water sorption , 1983 .

[25]  Dobroslav Znidarčić,et al.  Some measurements of the permeability of kaolin , 1988 .

[26]  G. C. Topp,et al.  Advances in Measurement of Soil Physical Properties: Bringing Theory into Practice , 1993 .

[27]  J. Philip,et al.  APPROXIMATE ANALYSIS OF THE BOREHOLE PERMEAMETER IN UNSATURED SOIL , 1985 .

[28]  M. Vauclin,et al.  A stochastic approach to studying the influence of the spatial variability of soil hydraulic properties on surface fluxes, temperature and humidity , 1995 .

[29]  T. Miyazaki,et al.  Scaling of saturated hydraulic conductivity: a comparison of models. , 2000 .

[30]  J. Philip Approximate analysis of falling-head lined borehole permeameter , 1993 .

[31]  R. Muñoz‐Carpena,et al.  Physical properties of “sorriba”-cultivated volcanic soils from Tenerife in relation to andic diagnostic parameters , 2003 .

[32]  J. Bouma Use of soil survey data to select measurement techniques for hydraulic conductivity , 1983 .

[33]  Ole H. Jacobsen,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN SPECIFIC SURFACE AREA AND SOIL PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES , 1996 .

[34]  Brent Clothier,et al.  THE CONSTANT HEAD WELL PERMEAMETER: EFFECT OF UNSATURATED FLOW , 1985 .

[35]  Nunzio Romano,et al.  Spatial variability of the hydraulic properties of a volcanic soil , 1995 .

[36]  G. C. Topp,et al.  A REEXAMINATION OF THE CONSTANT HEAD WELL PERMEAMETER METHOD FOR MEASURING SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY ABOVE THE WATER TABLE1 , 1983 .

[37]  J. Feyen,et al.  Characterisation of the field-saturated hydraulic conductivity on a hillslope: in situ single ring pressure infiltrometer measurements , 2002 .

[38]  M. Moustafa A geostatistical approach to optimize the determination of saturated hydraulic conductivity for large-scale subsurface drainage design in Egypt , 2000 .

[39]  W. Rawls,et al.  Predicting Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity Utilizing Fractal Principles , 1993 .

[40]  Nunzio Romano,et al.  Use of an inverse method and geostatistics to estimate soil hydraulic conductivity for spatial variability analysis , 1993 .

[41]  D. K. Cassel,et al.  EVALUATION OF SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY USING EFFECTIVE POROSITY DATA , 1989 .

[42]  P. Carman Fluid flow through granular beds , 1997 .

[43]  A. W. Warrick,et al.  13 – Spatial Variability of Soil Physical Properties in the Field , 1980 .

[44]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  A robust‐resistant spatial analysis of soil water infiltration , 1987 .

[45]  Abir Al-Tabbaa,et al.  Some measurements of the permeability of kaolin , 1987 .

[46]  Yvan Pannatier,et al.  Variowin: Software for Spatial Data Analysis in 2D , 1996 .

[47]  S. El‐Swaify,et al.  Changes in the Physical Properties of Soil Clays Due to Precipitated Aluminum and Iron Hydroxides: I. Swelling and Aggregate Stability After Drying 1 , 1975 .

[48]  Carlos Guillermo Dominguez,et al.  Tenerife, Islas Canarias , 1993 .

[49]  I. Messing,et al.  Seasonal variation in field-saturated hydraulic conductivity in two swelling clay soils in Sweden , 1990 .