The “Sling” Technique for Horizontal Guided Bone Regeneration: A Retrospective Case Series

The aim of this retrospective case series was to present a new technique, called the “sling technique”, for massive horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation through the innovative use of an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) membrane to reduce the risk of biological complications related to membrane exposure. Materials and Methods: Eligible patients for implant rehabilitation with a horizontal bone defect were enrolled in our study. All patients were treated with our new GBR approach, called the “sling technique” (ST), which consisted of covering the vestibular side of the bone defect with a stretched e-PTFE membrane. This technique allowed the amplification of the membrane surface as long as the compression and the immobilization of the underlying graft material remained (1:1 autologous bone and bovine xenograft). The membrane was placed far from the surgical incision of the mucosa to avoid infective complications. Pre- and post-regenerative surgery CBCT scans were used to assess the tissue gain amount after the GBR. Results: A total of 10 patients (4 females, 6 males; age range: 45–60 years old) were enrolled in our study and 33 implants were placed in regenerated bone. An average of 4 mm bone gain was achieved using the ST. No membrane exposures or biological complications were registered during the post-operative healing period. After a 24-month follow-up, a 100% implant survival rate was observed without hard or soft tissue dehiscence. Conclusion: The e-PTFE membrane positioned with the “sling technique” gave satisfactory results in horizontal bone augmentation. Considering the small sample, further confirmations with larger studies are needed.

[1]  S. Martina,et al.  Evaluation of Deviations between Computer-Planned Implant Position and In Vivo Placement through 3D-Printed Guide: A CBCT Scan Analysis on Implant Inserted in Esthetic Area , 2022, Applied Sciences.

[2]  L. Schiavo,et al.  Chronic Stress and Depression in Periodontitis and Peri-Implantitis: A Narrative Review on Neurobiological, Neurobehavioral and Immune–Microbiome Interplays and Clinical Management Implications , 2022, Dentistry journal.

[3]  W. Lai,et al.  Healing complications and their detrimental effects on bone gain in vertical-guided bone regeneration: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2022, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[4]  T. Gedrange,et al.  Possible Treatment of Severe Bone Dehiscences Based on 3D Bone Reconstruction—A Description of Treatment Methodology , 2021, Applied Sciences.

[5]  Joanna Wezgowiec,et al.  Natural Polymers for the Maintenance of Oral Health: Review of Recent Advances and Perspectives , 2021, International journal of molecular sciences.

[6]  Irena Duś-Ilnicka,et al.  PRP and PRF—Subgroups and Divisions When Used in Dentistry , 2021, Journal of personalized medicine.

[7]  M. Barbeck,et al.  Comparative In Vivo Analysis of the Integration Behavior and Immune Response of Collagen-Based Dental Barrier Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) , 2021, Membranes.

[8]  Jia-Hui Fu,et al.  Clinical and histological sequelae of surgical complications in horizontal guided bone regeneration: a systematic review and proposal for management , 2020, International Journal of Implant Dentistry.

[9]  L. Gobbato,et al.  Selection of Collagen Membranes for Bone Regeneration: A Literature Review , 2020, Materials.

[10]  H. Sujuti,et al.  Preparation and biodegradable properties of hydroxyapatite nanoparticle composite coated with poly lactic-co-glycolic acid/polyvinyl alcohol for bone regeneration. , 2020, Dental and medical problems.

[11]  R. Jung,et al.  Efficacy of lateral bone augmentation performed simultaneously with dental implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2019, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[12]  A. Monje,et al.  Guided Bone Regeneration in Alveolar Bone Reconstruction. , 2019, Oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of North America.

[13]  L. Tolstunov Surgical Algorithm for Alveolar Bone Augmentation in Implant Dentistry. , 2019, Oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of North America.

[14]  Hom-lay Wang,et al.  Effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration: A systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2018, Clinical oral implants research.

[15]  Hom-lay Wang,et al.  Decision Tree for Vertical Ridge Augmentation. , 2018, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[16]  Hom-lay Wang,et al.  Wound Healing Complications Following Guided Bone Regeneration for Ridge Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2018, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[17]  C. Ciacci,et al.  Tooth Wear Is Frequent in Adult Patients with Celiac Disease , 2017, Nutrients.

[18]  Teresa Roberta Tripi,et al.  Management of the exposure of a dense PTFE (d-PTFE) membrane in guided bone regeneration (GBR): a case report. , 2017, ORAL & implantology.

[19]  G. Pantaleo,et al.  Immediate loading of fixed prostheses in fully edentulous jaws - 1-year follow-up from a single-cohort retrospective study. , 2022, European journal of oral implantology.

[20]  G. Pantaleo,et al.  Zygomatic fractures: Technical modifications for better aesthetic and functional results in older patients. , 2016, International journal of surgery.

[21]  I. Milinkovic,et al.  Are there specific indications for the different alveolar bone augmentation procedures for implant placement? A systematic review. , 2014, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[22]  Frank J. Giordano,et al.  Rigenerazione ossea guidata con l’ausilio di griglie in titanio , 2010 .

[23]  M. Esposito,et al.  Vertical ridge augmentation with autogenous bone grafts 3 years after loading: resorbable barriers versus titanium-reinforced barriers. A randomized controlled clinical trial. , 2010, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[24]  A. Barone,et al.  Xenograft versus extraction alone for ridge preservation after tooth removal: a clinical and histomorphometric study. , 2008, Journal of periodontology.

[25]  Hom-lay Wang,et al.  “PASS” Principles for Predictable Bone Regeneration , 2006, Implant dentistry.

[26]  A. Wenzel,et al.  Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. , 2003, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[27]  H. F. Morris,et al.  The influence of bone thickness on facial marginal bone response: stage 1 placement through stage 2 uncovering. , 2000, Annals of periodontology.

[28]  P. Klokkevold,et al.  Preservation of alveolar bone in extraction sockets using bioabsorbable membranes. , 1998, Journal of periodontology.

[29]  U. Lekholm,et al.  Generation of new bone around titanium implants using a membrane technique: an experimental study in rabbits. , 1989, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[30]  E. Allen,et al.  Improved technique for localized ridge augmentation. A report of 21 cases. , 1985, Journal of periodontology.

[31]  J. Kent,et al.  Preservation of the alveolar ridge with hydroxylapatite tooth root substitutes. , 1985, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[32]  J. Seibert Reconstruction of deformed, partially edentulous ridges, using full thickness onlay grafts. Part I. Technique and wound healing. , 1983, The Compendium of continuing education in dentistry.