A test for detecting differentially methylated regions

DNA methylation is one of the most important phenomena in epigenetics. Because the DNA methylation process regulates gene expression without altering the corresponding DNA sequences, it can explain many biological processes such as onset of cancer, aging, and differentiation of species. Therefore, detecting differentially methylated region (DMR) between groups has been considered one of important analyses in epigenetics. For the datasets generated by the methylated DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP) technique, DMR analysis has employed the previous methods developed for the microarray-based gene expression dataset. However, for the datasets generated by more recent bisulfite-sequencing (BS-seq) technologies, totally different approaches need to be used. Unfortunately, only a few methods are available for DMR analysis among which the Fisher's exact test is most widely used. We first propose a new DMR test for BS-seq data. Our approach employs Cochran-Mantel-Hantzel (CMH) test and extend it by incorporating correlation structures between adjacent CpG cytosine sites. Then we apply it to a real dataset of two subspecies of honeybee for detecting DMR regions.

[1]  Martin Widschwendter,et al.  DNA methylation and breast carcinogenesis , 2002, Oncogene.

[2]  Gary G. Koch,et al.  Average Partial Association in Three-way Contingency Tables: a Review and Discussion of Alternative Tests , 1978 .

[3]  M. W. Birch.  The Detection of Partial Association, Ii: The General Case , 1965 .

[4]  Nathan Mantel,et al.  Chi-square tests with one degree of freedom , 1963 .

[5]  Stephan Beck,et al.  Methylome analysis using MeDIP-seq with low DNA concentrations , 2012, Nature Protocols.

[6]  R. Martienssen,et al.  Reprogramming of DNA Methylation in Pollen Guides Epigenetic Inheritance via Small RNA , 2012, Cell.

[7]  Andrew J Sharp,et al.  DNA methylation profiles of human active and inactive X chromosomes. , 2011, Genome research.

[8]  S. Yi,et al.  Bis-class: a new classification tool of methylation status using bayes classifier and local methylation information , 2014, BMC Genomics.

[9]  T. Tollefsbol,et al.  DNA methylation detection: bisulfite genomic sequencing analysis. , 2011, Methods in molecular biology.

[10]  A. von Haeseler,et al.  Advanced Methylome Analysis after Bisulfite Deep Sequencing: An Example in Arabidopsis , 2012, PloS one.

[11]  T. Huang,et al.  Methylated DNA immunoprecipitation and microarray-based analysis: detection of DNA methylation in breast cancer cell lines. , 2009, Methods in molecular biology.

[12]  B. Pickard,et al.  Epigenetic targeting in the mouse zygote marks DNA for later methylation: a mechanism for maternal effects in development , 2001, Mechanisms of Development.

[13]  W. Haenszel,et al.  Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. , 1959, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[14]  J. Newell-Price,et al.  DNA Methylation and Silencing of Gene Expression , 2000, Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism.

[15]  Rudolf Jaenisch,et al.  Role for DNA methylation in genomic imprinting , 1993, Nature.

[16]  W. G. Cochran.  Some Methods for Strengthening the Common χ 2 Tests , 1954 .

[17]  Andrew P. Feinberg,et al.  Reversible switching between epigenetic states in honeybee behavioral subcastes , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.