Simple homogeneous models

This paper attempts to give a self-contained development of dividing theory (also called forking theory) in a strongly homogeneous structure. Dividing is a combinatorial property of the invariant relations on a structure that have yielded deep results for the models of so-called "simple" first-order theories. Below we describe for the nonspecialist how this paper fits in the broader context of geometrical stability theory. Naturally, some background in first-order model theory helps to understand these motivating results; however virtually no knowledge of logic is assumed in this paper. Readers desiring a more thorough description of geometrical stability theory are referred to the surveys [Hru97] and [Hru98]. Traditionally, geometrical stability theory is a collection of results that apply to definable relations on arbitrary models of a complete first-order theory. It is equivalent and convenient to restrict our attention to the definable relations on a fixed representative model of the theory, called a universal domain. Using the terminology of the abstract, a universal domain is an uncountable model M equipped with the first-order definable relations R which is strongly IMI-homogeneous and compact; i.e., if {Xi: i E I}, where III < IMI, is a family of definable relations on M so that niEF Xi + 0 for any finite F C I, then niEI Xi + 0. For our purposes the reader can assume there is a one-to-one correspondence between (complete first-order) theories and universal domains. A massive amount of abstract model theory was developed en route to Shelah's proof of Morley's Conjecture about the number of models, ranging over uncountable cardinals, of a fixed first-order theory [She9O]. Most of the work concerned the case of a stable theory, which will not be defined here for the sake of brevity. What is relevant is that most theorems describing the models of a stable theory rely on the forking independence relation. The forking independence relation, F, is a ternary relation on the subsets of the universal domain of a theory, where F(A, B; C) is read "A is forking independent from B over C" (see Remark 2.2). In a stable theory forking independence is symmetric (over C), has finite character (in A and B), bounded dividing, the free extension property and is transitive. (See Definition 2.5, Theorem 2.14 and Corollary 2.15 for precise statements of these properties.) These properties facilitate the introduction of several notions of dimension that lead to procedures for determining when two models are isomorphic. The combinatorial-geometric properties of the definable relations reflected in these dimensions profoundly impact the structure of the models beyond the question of fixing an isomorphism type. The results connected to algebra, known as geometrical

[1]  P. Dangerfield Logic , 1996, Aristotle and the Stoics.

[2]  S. Shelah,et al.  Annals of Pure and Applied Logic , 1991 .

[3]  Frank O. Wagner ESSENTIAL STABILITY THEORY (Perspectives in Mathematical Logic) , 1997 .

[4]  Itay Ben-Yaacov Discouraging results for ultraimaginary independence theory , 2003, J. Symb. Log..

[5]  Anand Pillay,et al.  Differential Galois Theory II , 1997, Ann. Pure Appl. Log..

[6]  Tapani Hyttinen,et al.  A rank for the class of elementary submodels of a superstable homogeneous model , 2002, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[7]  Rami P. Grossberg,et al.  Shelah's stability spectrum and homogeneity spectrum in finite diagrams , 2002, Arch. Math. Log..

[8]  Ehud Hrushovski,et al.  Stability and its uses , 1996 .

[9]  H. Gaifman,et al.  Symbolic Logic , 1881, Nature.

[10]  Ehud Hrushovski,et al.  Simplicity and the Lascar group , 1998 .

[11]  S. A. Sherman,et al.  Providence , 1906 .

[12]  Alistair H. Lachlan,et al.  aleph0-Categorical, aleph0-stable structures , 1985, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic.

[13]  W. Hodges CLASSIFICATION THEORY AND THE NUMBER OF NON‐ISOMORPHIC MODELS , 1980 .

[14]  Steven Buechler ESSENTIAL STABILITY THEORY (Perspectives in Mathematical Logic) , .

[15]  Edwin Hewitt,et al.  Real and Abstract Analysis: A Modern Treatment of the Theory of Functions of a Real Variable , 1965 .

[16]  Frank O. Wagner Hyperdefinable Groups in Simple Theories , 2001, J. Math. Log..

[17]  José Iovino STABLE BANACH SPACES AND BANACH SPACE STRUCTURES, II: FORKING AND COMPACT TOPOLOGIES , 1998 .

[18]  Anand Pillay,et al.  Differential Galois theory I , 1998 .

[19]  Ehud Hrushovski,et al.  Model theory of difference fields , 1999 .

[20]  H. Keisler Model theory for infinitary logic , 1971 .

[21]  Anand Pillay,et al.  Forking in the category of existentially closed structures , 2000 .

[22]  Boris Zilber,et al.  Uncountably Categorical Theories , 1993 .

[23]  Ehud Hrushovski,et al.  Zariski Geometries , 1993 .

[24]  JOSÉ IOVINO STABLE BANACH SPACES AND BANACH SPACE STRUCTURES, I: FUNDAMENTALS , 1995 .

[25]  Saharon Shelah,et al.  Simple unstable theories , 1980 .

[26]  Steven Buechler Supersimple theories , 1997 .

[27]  R. Lathe Phd by thesis , 1988, Nature.

[28]  Saharon Shelah,et al.  Strong Splitting in Stable Homogeneous Models , 2000, Ann. Pure Appl. Log..

[29]  Alistair H. Lachlan,et al.  ℵ 0 -Categorical, ℵ 0 -stable structures , 1985 .

[30]  H. Jerome Keisler,et al.  Model theory for infinitary logic : logic with countable conjunctions and finite quantifiers , 1971 .

[31]  Edwin Hewitt,et al.  Real And Abstract Analysis , 1967 .

[32]  Daniel Lascar,et al.  On the category of models of a complete theory , 1982, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[33]  Byunghan Kim Forking in Simple Unstable Theories , 1998 .

[34]  Saharon Shelah,et al.  Finite diagrams stable in power , 1970 .

[35]  B. M. Fulk MATH , 1992 .

[36]  Anand Pillay,et al.  Coordinatisation and canonical bases in simple theories , 2000, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[37]  Anand Pillay,et al.  Differential Galois theory III: Some inverse problems , 1997 .

[38]  Chen C. Chang,et al.  Model Theory: Third Edition (Dover Books On Mathematics) By C.C. Chang;H. Jerome Keisler;Mathematics , 1966 .

[39]  Victor Harnik,et al.  Review: S. Shelah, Classification Theory and the Number of Nonisomorphic Models , 1982, Journal of Symbolic Logic.