Biomechanical behavior of scar tissue and uninjured skin in a porcine model

A new method to test axial and transverse tensile properties of skin was developed to improve our understanding of skin mechanical behavior, and how it changes following injury and formation of a scar. Skin tissue was evaluated at 70 days following full‐thickness wounding in juvenile female pigs (N=14). Samples were taken in the axial (cranial–caudal) and transverse (dorsal–ventral) directions, for both scar tissue and uninjured skin, and were evaluated mechanically in vitro using a protocol of stress relaxation followed by tensile failure. Uninjured skin was more compliant, with a larger toe‐in region, and faster load relaxation, in the axial direction than the transverse. Such directional differences were not present in high‐load responses, such as linear stiffness or failure properties. When compared with uninjured skin, scars displayed a similar linear stiffness, with considerably reduced failure properties, and reduced low‐load compliance. Scars showed no directional differences in low‐load behavior, viscous response, or failure properties. These findings suggest morphological changes that may occur with injury that are consistent with the viscoelastic and directional changes observed experimentally. This improved understanding of how injury affects skin biomechanical function provides valuable information necessary for the design of successful grafting procedures and tissue‐engineered skin replacements.

[1]  Robson Mc,et al.  Animal models of wound contraction. , 1991 .

[2]  C. Frank,et al.  Early medial collateral ligament scars have inferior creep behaviour , 2000, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[3]  Shu Chien,et al.  Handbook of Bioengineering , 1986 .

[4]  Natalia Juncosa-Melvin,et al.  Functional tissue engineering for tendon repair: A multidisciplinary strategy using mesenchymal stem cells, bioscaffolds, and mechanical stimulation , 2008, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[5]  B. Pomeranz,et al.  The sympathomimetic agent, 6-hydroxydopamine, accelerates cutaneous wound healing. , 1999, European journal of pharmacology.

[6]  T. Gibson Karl Langer (1819-1887) and his lines. , 1978, British journal of plastic surgery.

[7]  Y. Lanir,et al.  Effects of Strain Level and Proteoglycan Depletion on Preconditioning and Viscoelastic Responses of Rat Dorsal Skin , 2001, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  M. Robson,et al.  Animal models of wound contraction. , 1991, Progress in clinical and biological research.

[9]  P. Byers,et al.  Structure of the dermal matrix during development and in the adult. , 1982, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[10]  D. Hart,et al.  Dermal fibroblasts from red Duroc and Yorkshire pigs exhibit intrinsic differences in the contraction of collagen gels , 2008, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[11]  D. Hart,et al.  The pig as a model for excisional skin wound healing: characterization of the molecular and cellular biology, and bacteriology of the healing process. , 2001, Comparative medicine.

[12]  T. Gibson,et al.  Directional variation in extensibility of human skin in vivo. , 1969, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  S. Harvey,et al.  THE HEALING OF WOUNDS AS DETERMINED BY THEIR TENSILE STRENGTH , 1929 .

[14]  A. Viidik,et al.  The influence of cortisol on wound healing of the skin and distant connective tissue response. , 1979, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.

[15]  R. Quesada,et al.  Espinosa de los monteros , 2000 .

[16]  J. Mathis,et al.  Effect of adenoviral mediated overexpression of fibromodulin on human dermal fibroblasts and scar formation in full-thickness incisional wounds , 2007, Journal of Molecular Medicine.

[17]  Tensile strength, relaxation and mechanical recovery in rat skin as influenced by maturation and age. , 1976, Journal of medicine.

[18]  P. Fratzl,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of collagen: synchrotron radiation investigations and structural model. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[19]  T. Best,et al.  A nonlinear rheological assessment of muscle recovery from eccentric stretch injury. , 2003, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[20]  D. Hart,et al.  Genetic analysis of skin wound healing and scarring in a porcine model , 2006, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[21]  Paolo P. Provenzano,et al.  Nonlinear Ligament Viscoelasticity , 2001, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  P. Provenzano,et al.  Scanning Electron Microscopic Characterization of Healing and Normal Rat Ligament Microstructure Under Slack and Loaded Conditions , 2003, Connective tissue research.

[23]  C. Frank,et al.  Healing ligaments have decreased cyclic modulus compared to normal ligaments and immobilization further compromises healing ligament response to cyclic loading , 2003, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[24]  D. Hart,et al.  Genetic involvement in skin wound healing and scarring in domestic pigs: assessment of molecular expression patterns in (Yorkshire x Red Duroc) x Yorkshire backcross animals. , 2007, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[25]  S. Turner,et al.  Creep in Glassy Polymers , 1973 .

[26]  C. Frank,et al.  Rabbit medial collateral ligament scar weakness is associated with decreased collagen pyridinoline crosslink density , 1995, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[27]  Y. Lanir The fibrous structure of the skin and its relation to mechanical behaviour , 1981 .

[28]  Vogel Hg Tensile strength, relaxation and mechanical recovery in rat skin as influenced by maturation and age. , 1976 .

[29]  H. Stark Directional variations in the extensibility of human skin. , 1977, British journal of plastic surgery.

[30]  T. G. Beckwith,et al.  Tensiometric Studies of Unwounded and Wounded Skin: Results Using a Standardized Testing Method , 1971, Annals of surgery.

[31]  H G Vogel,et al.  Directional variations of mechanical parameters in rat skin depending on maturation and age. , 1981, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[32]  Laura Vitellaro‐Zuccarello,et al.  Stereological analysis of collagen and elastic fibers in the normal human dermis: Variability with age, sex, and body region , 1994, The Anatomical record.

[33]  M. Vermeij,et al.  RGTA OTR 4120, a heparan sulfate proteoglycan mimetic, increases wound breaking strength and vasodilatory capability in healing rat full‐thickness excisional wounds , 2008, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[34]  Jeffrey M Davidson,et al.  Healing slack skin. , 2006, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[35]  A. Ghahary,et al.  Chemical characterization and quantification of proteoglycans in human post-burn hypertrophic and mature scars. , 1996, Clinical science.

[36]  R. E. Robertson,et al.  The Physics of Glassy Polymers , 1973 .

[37]  D. Poppas,et al.  Effects of temperature on tissue thermal injury and wound strength after photothermal wound closure , 1999, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[38]  E. Middelkoop,et al.  Higher numbers of autologous fibroblasts in an artificial dermal substitute improve tissue regeneration and modulate scar tissue formation , 2000, The Journal of pathology.

[39]  R Vanderby,et al.  Interrelation of creep and relaxation: a modeling approach for ligaments. , 1999, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[40]  C. Frank,et al.  Ligament creep recruits fibres at low stresses and can lead to modulus‐reducing fibre damage at higher creep stresses: a study in rabbit medial collateral ligament model , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[41]  J M Mansour,et al.  A method for obtaining repeatable measurements of the tensile properties of skin at low strain. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[42]  J. Manschot,et al.  The measurement and modelling of the mechanical properties of human skin in vivo--I. The measurement. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[43]  D. Hollander,et al.  Standardized qualitative evaluation of scar tissue properties in an animal wound healing model , 2003, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[44]  V. Langer,et al.  Zur Anatomie und Physiologie der Haut. I. Über die Spaltbarkeit der Cutis , 2022 .

[45]  P. Leung,et al.  Mechanical characterisation of human postburn hypertrophic skin during pressure therapy. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.