The effect of interaction models on multi-user usability of collaborative virtual environments

Multi-user usability of collaborative virtual environments (VEs) require the consideration of users' socio-human needs. However, most investigations of the usability have focused on either the technologies involved or individual user experience. Few have examined the effect of interaction models on multi-user usability, by taking account the socio-human needs. Thus, we have undertaken a study on such effect for collaborative tasks, comparing two interaction models: first-come-first-serve (FCFS) and dynamic priority (DP). Departing largely from our previous verification of these models for conflict resolution, the current study assessed multi-user usability for achieving a collaborative goal in a quasi-practical scenario. Based on the ISO/IEC 25010:2011 standard on usability, our observations revealed that multiple users completed the collaborative tasks statistically more effective, efficient, and satisfactory under the DP model than under the FCFS model. These observations indicate a potential practicality of the DP model for multi-user VEs, in which experts perform collaborative tasks.

[1]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  Francisco Rebelo,et al.  Main Usability Issues in Using Virtual Environments for Older Population Warning Studies , 2013, HCI.

[3]  Carl Sandom,et al.  Human factors for engineers , 2004 .

[4]  James K. Brewer,et al.  Statistical Rules of Thumb , 2003 .

[5]  Kasper Hornbæk,et al.  Work-domain knowledge in usability evaluation: Experiences with Cooperative Usability Testing , 2010, J. Syst. Softw..

[6]  George A. Miller,et al.  Human memory and the storage of information , 1956, IRE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[7]  Silvia Mara Abrahão,et al.  Interplay between User Experience (UX) evaluation and system development , 2014, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[8]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Mechanisms for collaboration: A design and evaluation framework for multi-user interfaces , 2012, TCHI.

[9]  Brian Peacock,et al.  Statistical Distributions: Forbes/Statistical Distributions 4E , 2010 .

[10]  M. Feldman,et al.  Boundaries as Junctures: Collaborative Boundary Work for Building Efficient Resilience , 2014 .

[11]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Rethinking 'multi-user': an in-the-wild study of how groups approach a walk-up-and-use tabletop interface , 2011, CHI.

[12]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Children designing together on a multi-touch tabletop: an analysis of spatial orientation and user interactions , 2009, IDC.

[13]  Tao Zeng,et al.  Dynamic strategies of conflict resolution on human perception of equality within multi-user collaborative virtual environments , 2013, 9th IEEE International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing.

[14]  Shailey Minocha,et al.  Interaction Design and Usability of Learning Spaces in 3D Multi-user Virtual Worlds , 2009, HWID.

[15]  ISO / IEC 25010 : 2011 Systems and software engineering — Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation ( SQuaRE ) — System and software quality models , 2013 .

[16]  Klaus Hinkelmann,et al.  Design and Analysis of Experiments: Introduction to Experimental Design , 1994 .

[17]  A. Welford Choice reaction time: Basic concepts , 1980 .

[18]  Dieter Kranzlmüller,et al.  Supporting social human communication between distributed walk-in displays , 2004, VRST '04.

[19]  Frank E. Ritter,et al.  User-Centered Systems Design: A Brief History , 2014 .