The heterospecific calling song can improve conspecific signal detection in a bushcricket species

Abstract In forest clearings of the Malaysian rainforest, chirping and trilling Mecopoda species often live in sympatry. We investigated whether a phenomenon known as stochastic resonance (SR) improved the ability of individuals to detect a low‐frequent signal component typical of chirps when members of the heterospecific trilling species were simultaneously active. This phenomenon may explain the fact that the chirping species upholds entrainment to the conspecific song in the presence of the trill. Therefore, we evaluated the response probability of an ascending auditory neuron (TN‐1) in individuals of the chirping Mecopoda species to triple‐pulsed 2, 8 and 20 kHz signals that were broadcast 1 dB below the hearing threshold while increasing the intensity of either white noise or a typical triller song. Our results demonstrate the existence of SR over a rather broad range of signal‐to‐noise ratios (SNRs) of input signals when periodic 2 kHz and 20 kHz signals were presented at the same time as white noise. Using the chirp‐specific 2 kHz signal as a stimulus, the maximum TN‐1 response probability frequently exceeded the 50% threshold if the trill was broadcast simultaneously. Playback of an 8 kHz signal, a common frequency band component of the trill, yielded a similar result. Nevertheless, using the trill as a masker, the signal‐related TN‐1 spiking probability was rather variable. The variability on an individual level resulted from correlations between the phase relationship of the signal and syllables of the trill. For the first time, these results demonstrate the existence of SR in acoustically‐communicating insects and suggest that the calling song of heterospecifics may facilitate the detection of a subthreshold signal component in certain situations. The results of the simulation of sound propagation in a computer model suggest a wide range of sender‐receiver distances in which the triller can help to improve the detection of subthreshold signals in the chirping species. HighlightsStochastic resonance (SR) improves acoustic signal detection in a chirping insect.White noise or a heterospecific trill leads to SR in a broad range of SNRs.The trill improves the detection of a conspecific frequency band.The response variability is related to the timing of the signal and the trill.Sound simulation suggests a wide range of distances in which SR occurs.

[1]  A S Feng,et al.  Detection of auditory signals by frog inferior collicular neurons in the presence of spatially separated noise. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  P. Landa Mechanism of stochastic resonance , 2004 .

[3]  Derek Abbott,et al.  What Is Stochastic Resonance? Definitions, Misconceptions, Debates, and Its Relevance to Biology , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[4]  Keiichi Kitajo,et al.  Internal noise determines external stochastic resonance in visual perception , 2008, Vision Research.

[5]  E. Sismondo,et al.  Synchronous, Alternating, and Phase-Locked Stridulation by a Tropical Katydid , 1990, Science.

[6]  Ditto,et al.  Stochastic Resonance in a Neuronal Network from Mammalian Brain. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[7]  P. Narins,et al.  Temperature dependence of two-tone rate suppression in the northern leopard frog, Rana pipiens pipiens. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Klaus Riede,et al.  Spectral niche segregation and community organization in a tropical cricket assemblage , 2013 .

[9]  Neuronal correlates of a preference for leading signals in the synchronizing bushcricket Mecopoda elongata (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae) , 2011, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[10]  Jörg Lewald,et al.  High-frequency sound transmission in natural habitats: implications for the evolution of insect acoustic communication , 1992, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[11]  J. Tougaard,et al.  Detection of short pure-tone stimuli in the noctuid ear: what are temporal integration and integration time all about? , 1998, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[12]  H. Schulze,et al.  Stochastic Resonance Controlled Upregulation of Internal Noise after Hearing Loss as a Putative Cause of Tinnitus-Related Neuronal Hyperactivity , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[13]  Frank Jülicher,et al.  Active hair-bundle motility harnesses noise to operate near an optimum of mechanosensitivity. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  J. E. Frank,et al.  Mechanical Noise Enhances Signal Transmission in the Bullfrog Sacculus , 2003, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[15]  The Auditory System of Homorocoryphus (Tettigonioidea, Orthoptera) , 1969 .

[16]  A. Fulin Universal Character of Stochastic Resonance and a Constructive Role of White Noise , 2000 .

[17]  F. Jülicher,et al.  ACTIVE HAIR-BUNDLE MOTILITY HARNESSES NOISE TO OPERATE NEAR AN OPTIMUM OF MECHANOSENSITIVITY , 2006 .

[18]  Alexander B. Neiman,et al.  Stochastic resonance in psychophysics and in animal behavior , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[19]  H. Römer,et al.  Competition and cooperation in a synchronous bushcricket chorus , 2014, Royal Society Open Science.

[20]  Frank Moss,et al.  Noise enhancement of information transfer in crayfish mechanoreceptors by stochastic resonance , 1993, Nature.

[21]  H. Römer,et al.  Maintaining acoustic communication at a cocktail party: heterospecific masking noise improves signal detection through frequency separation , 2013, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[22]  Frank Moss,et al.  Use of behavioural stochastic resonance by paddle fish for feeding , 1999, Nature.

[23]  John P. Miller,et al.  Broadband neural encoding in the cricket cereal sensory system enhanced by stochastic resonance , 1996, Nature.

[24]  Peter Hänggi,et al.  Stochastic resonance in biology. How noise can enhance detection of weak signals and help improve biological information processing. , 2002, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[25]  Jakob Tougaard,et al.  Signal detection theory, detectability and stochastic resonance effects , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[26]  David N. Lyttle Stochastic Resonance in Neurobiology , 2008 .

[27]  Gregoire Nicolis,et al.  Stochastic resonance , 2007, Scholarpedia.

[28]  R. Balakrishnan,et al.  A DIVERSITY OF SONGS AMONG MORPHOLOGICALLY INDISTINGUISHABLE KATYDIDS OF THE GENUS MECOPODA ORTHOPTERA: TETTIGONIIDAE) FROM SOUTHERN INDIA , 2006 .

[29]  Bruce R. Johnson,et al.  Tools for physiology labs: an inexpensive high-performance amplifier and electrode for extracellular recording , 2001, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[30]  B. Ronacher,et al.  Effects of signal duration on the recognition of masked communication signals by the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus , 2000, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[31]  Kurt Wiesenfeld,et al.  Stochastic resonance and the benefits of noise: from ice ages to crayfish and SQUIDs , 1995, Nature.

[32]  Jakob Tougaard,et al.  Stochastic resonance and signal detection in an energy detector – implications for biological receptor systems , 2000, Biological Cybernetics.

[33]  Mark A. Bee The cocktail party problem: What is it? How can it be solved? And why should students of bioacoustics study it? , 2006 .

[34]  Thomas T. Imhoff,et al.  Noise-enhanced tactile sensation , 1996, Nature.

[35]  N. Bibikov,et al.  Addition of noise enhances neural synchrony to amplitude-modulated sounds in the frog’s midbrain , 2002, Hearing Research.

[36]  O. Korsunovskaya Acoustic signals in katydids (Orthoptera, Tettigonidae). Communication 2 , 2008, Entomological Review.

[37]  Erik S. Schneider,et al.  "Sensory structures on the antennal flagella of two katydid species of the genus Mecopoda (Orthoptera, Tettigonidae)". , 2016, Micron.

[38]  M. A. Bee,et al.  The cocktail party problem: what is it? How can it be solved? And why should animal behaviorists study it? , 2008, Journal of comparative psychology.

[39]  Heiner Römer,et al.  Masking by Noise in Acoustic Insects: Problems and Solutions , 2013 .

[40]  Manfred Hartbauer,et al.  Animal Communication Networks: Predation and noise in communication networks of neotropical katydids , 2005 .

[41]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Human hearing enhanced by noise 1 1 Published on the World Wide Web on 23 May 2000. , 2000, Brain Research.

[42]  H. Römer,et al.  Neural Mechanisms for Acoustic Signal Detection under Strong Masking in an Insect , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  W. Hödl,et al.  HABITAT ACOUSTICS OF A NEOTROPICAL LOWLAND RAINFOREST , 2003 .

[44]  Arne K. D. Schmidt,et al.  Solutions to the Cocktail Party Problem in Insects: Selective Filters, Spatial Release from Masking and Gain Control in Tropical Crickets , 2011, PloS one.

[45]  A. Fulínski,et al.  Universal Character of Stochastic Resonance and a Constructive Role of White Noise , 2000 .

[46]  Carson C. Chow,et al.  Stochastic resonance without tuning , 1995, Nature.

[47]  H. Römer,et al.  Reliable detection of predator cues in afferent spike trains of a katydid under high background noise levels , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[48]  N. Pizzolato,et al.  Evidence of stochastic resonance in the mating behavior of Nezara viridula (L.) , 2008, 0810.1477.

[49]  K. Henry,et al.  Noise improves transfer of near-threshold, phase-locked activity of the cochlear nerve: evidence for stochastic resonance? , 1999, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[50]  Hollis G. Potter,et al.  Author Manuscript , 2013 .

[51]  D. Nozaki,et al.  How does stochastic resonance work within the human brain? – Psychophysics of internal and external noise , 2010 .

[52]  N. Suga,et al.  Neural Mechanism of Hearing in Insects , 1960 .