The influence of attitude towards individuals’ choice for a remotely piloted commercial flight: A latent class logit approach

The Remotely Piloted Commercial Passenger Aircraft Attitude Scale (RPCPAAS) was created to measure positive and negative attitudes towards a new and plausible form of air travel. This information was then used, in combination with a latent class logit model built on data generated from a stated choice experiment to gain insight into the choice behaviour between conventionally piloted aircraft (CPA) with a pilot on-board and remotely piloted aircraft (RPA) with a pilot on the ground. The results revealed that individuals, on-average, if presented a choice between a CPA and a RPA of equivalent attributes, would elect for the CPA option. However, there is variability in the passengers’ sensitivity to various flight attributes, and these sensitivities were influenced by individuals’ attitude towards the new technology (i.e., RPA). From an operational perspective, and assuming that one day passengers of commercial airlines are offered the choice between CPA and RPA, the strategies employed by airlines to encourage the use of the new technology need to be different, based on individuals’ attitude towards RPA.

[1]  Mark W. Scerbo,et al.  Automation-induced complacency for monitoring highly reliable systems: the role of task complexity, system experience, and operator trust , 2007 .

[2]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Designing for Situation Awareness : An Approach to User-Centered Design , 2003 .

[3]  Deborah Lee,et al.  Measuring Individual Differences in the Perfect Automation Schema , 2015, Hum. Factors.

[4]  Gary S. Nickell,et al.  The computer attitude scale , 1986 .

[5]  D. McFadden.  Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[6]  David Trafimow,et al.  The automated cockpit: A comparison of attitudes towards human and automated pilots , 2009 .

[7]  Bernard Barber,et al.  The Logic and Limits of Trust , 1983 .

[8]  Timothy G. Rosser,et al.  Indian and American consumer perceptions of cockpit configuration policy , 2015 .

[9]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Humans: Still Vital After All These Years of Automation , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[10]  R. Lifran,et al.  The case for offshore wind farms, artificial reefs and sustainable tourism in the French mediterranean , 2013 .

[11]  John M. Rose,et al.  Interactive stated choice surveys: a study of air travel behaviour , 2012 .

[12]  K. Train,et al.  Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level , 1998, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[13]  Barbara H Wixom,et al.  A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[14]  N. Moray,et al.  Trust in automation. Part II. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation. , 1996, Ergonomics.

[15]  Kenneth E. Train,et al.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2016 .

[16]  David A. Hensher,et al.  A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit , 2003 .

[17]  P A Hancock,et al.  Automation: how much is too much? , 2014, Ergonomics.

[18]  Ann Williamson,et al.  Measuring the effect of aviation safety risk reduction on flight choice in young travellers , 2015 .

[19]  David A. Hensher,et al.  A practical approach to identifying the market potential for high speed rail: A case study in the Sydney-Canberra corridor , 1997 .

[20]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  A new baseline model for estimating willingness to pay from discrete choice models , 2013, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.

[21]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[22]  Scott R. Winter,et al.  Which Passenger Emotions Mediate the Relationship Between Type of Pilot Configuration and Willingness to Fly in Commercial Aviation , 2015 .

[23]  Floyd J. Fowler,et al.  Improving Survey Questions: Design and Evaluation , 1995 .

[24]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Modelling consumer choice behaviour in space tourism , 2009 .

[25]  Brett R.C. Molesworth,et al.  Tipping point: The narrow path between automation acceptance and rejection in air traffic management , 2012 .

[26]  Tomer Toledo,et al.  Does it pay to reveal safety information? The effect of safety information on flight choice , 2015 .

[27]  Robert F. DeVellis,et al.  Scale Development: Theory and Applications. , 1992 .

[28]  Timothy G. Rosser,et al.  Passengers from India and the United States Have Differential Opinions about Autonomous Auto-Pilots for Commercial Flights , 2014 .