Modelling social systems as complex: Towards a social simulation meta-model

There is growing interest in extending complex systems approaches to the social sciences. This is apparent in the increasingly widespread literature and journals that deal with the topic and is being facilitated by adoption of multi-agent simulation in research. Much of this research uses simple agents to explore limited aspects of social behaviour. Incorporation of higher order capabilities such as cognition into agents has proven problematic. Influenced by AI approaches, where cognitive capability has been sought, it has commonly been attempted based on a 'representational' theory of cognition. This has proven computationally expensive and difficult to implement. There would be some benefit also in the development of a framework for social simulation research which provides a consistent set of assumptions applicable in different fields and which can be scaled to apply to simple and more complex simulation tasks. This paper sets out, as a basis for discussion, a meta-model incorporating an 'enactive' model of cognition drawing on both complex system insights and the theory of autopoiesis. It is intended to provide an ontology that avoids some of the limitation of more traditional approaches and at the same time providing a basis for simulation in a wide range of fields and pursuant of a wider range of human behaviours.

[1]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  The origins of order , 1993 .

[2]  Klaus G. Troitzsch,et al.  Social Science Simulation — Origins, Prospects, Purposes , 1997 .

[3]  C. Castelfranchi Through the Minds of the Agents , 1998 .

[4]  Bill McKelvey,et al.  Complexity Theory in Organization Science: Seizing the Promise or Becoming a Fad? , 1999 .

[5]  G. Hodgson Economics and institutions , 1988 .

[6]  G. Nigel Gilbert,et al.  Simulation for the social scientist , 1999 .

[7]  J. Smythies,et al.  The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience . By F. J. Varela, E. Thompson and E. Rosch. (Pp. 308; illustrated; £22.50.) MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass. 1991. , 1993, Psychological Medicine.

[8]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Growing artificial societies , 1996 .

[9]  D. Morgan,et al.  Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. , 1983 .

[10]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  Technological evolution and adaptive organizations: Ideas from biology may find applications in economics , 1995, Complex..

[11]  M. Minsky The Society of Mind , 1986 .

[12]  I. Benenson,et al.  Spatial Cognitive Dissonance and Sociospatial Emergence in a Self-Organizing City , 1997 .

[13]  Michael W. Macy Social Order in Artificial Worlds , 1998, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[14]  Francisco J. Varela Two Principles for Self-Organization , 1984 .

[15]  Rodney A. Brooks,et al.  Intelligence Without Reason , 1991, IJCAI.

[16]  Pietro Terna Simulation tools for social scientists: Building agent-based models with SWARM , 1998, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[17]  Robert Axelrod Advancing the art of simulation in the social sciences , 1997 .

[18]  Michael Möhring,et al.  Can Agents Cover All the World , 1997 .

[19]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition - a new foundation for design , 1987 .

[20]  Nigel Gilbert,et al.  Computer simulation for social theory , 1995 .

[21]  H. Maturana,et al.  Autopoiesis and Cognition , 1980 .

[22]  H. Maturana,et al.  The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding , 2007 .

[23]  H. Maturana,et al.  Brain, language and the origin of human mental functions. , 1995, Biological research.

[24]  S. N. K. Watt,et al.  Artificial Societies and Psychological Agents , 1997, Software Agents and Soft Computing.

[25]  W. Arthur,et al.  The Economy as an Evolving Complex System II , 1988 .

[26]  H. Maturana Reality: The Search for Objectivity or the Quest for a Compelling Argument , 1988 .

[27]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Intelligent agents: theory and practice , 1995, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[28]  R. A. Brooks,et al.  Intelligence without Representation , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[29]  Chris Goldspink,et al.  Social attractors : an examination of the applicability of complexity theory to social and organisational analysis , 1999 .

[30]  J. Mingers,et al.  Self-Producing Systems: Implications and Applications of Autopoiesis , 1996 .

[31]  E. Wilson,et al.  Sociobiology. The New Synthesis , 1975 .

[32]  P. M. Hejl,et al.  Towards a Theory of Social Systems: Self-Organization and Self-Maintenance, Self-Reference and Syn-Reference , 1984 .

[33]  P. Ormerod The Death of Economics , 1994 .

[34]  Russ Marion The Edge of Organization: Chaos and Complexity Theories of Formal Social Systems , 1999 .

[35]  F. Varela Principles of biological autonomy , 1979 .

[36]  古河 幹夫 Economics and Institutions/G.M.Hodgson(1988) , 1989 .

[37]  R. Hegselmann,et al.  Simulating Social Phenomena , 1997 .