In Search of Quality Student Teachers in a Digital Era: Reframing the Practices of Soft Skills in Teacher Education

The purpose of this current study was to examine and document the practices of soft skills (communication, IT, numeracy, learning how to learn, problem solving, working with others, and subject-specific competencies) among English as foreign language (EFL) student teachers at one public university teacher education program in Jambi, Indonesia. The study centred on examining the level of soft skills practised by EFL student teachers in their learning process and the level of student engagement in every statement of soft skill components. Data were collected through distributing a questionnaire to EFL student teachers. The findings of the study showed the mean score of soft skills practices in overall (3.28 of 5.00) which was at an average level. A closer examination on more specific skills, five of seven Soft skills were practied at medium level; they were numeracy, learning how to learn, IT and problem solving and subject-specific competencies. However they rated their soft skills in term of communication and working each other at high level. The findings implied that the soft skills were not well-blended and practiced in learning and teaching process at the research site.

[1]  Neville Bennett,et al.  Skills Development in Higher Education and Employment , 2000 .

[2]  Robert McCaughan Smith.  Learning How to Learn: Applied Theory for Adults , 1982 .

[3]  Amirul Mukminin,et al.  In the Spirit of Quality Student Teachers’ English Proficiency and Pedagogical Skills: Teacher Educators and School Principals’ Perception , 2016 .

[4]  Rosmiati Rosmiati,et al.  Student Teachers’ Reasons for Choosing a Teacher Education Program at One Public University in Indonesia and Policy Implications , 2016 .

[5]  Peter Kearns,et al.  Generic Skills for the New Economy. Review of Research. , 2001 .

[6]  Jessica Pumphrey,et al.  An assessment of generic skills needs , 2002 .

[7]  B. Clark,et al.  The entrepreneurial university: Demand and response , 1998 .

[8]  Manju Gera,et al.  DEVELOPING GENERIC SKILLS IN HIGHER EDUCATION , 2015 .

[9]  Anthony Kelly,et al.  The evolution of key skills: towards a tawney paradigm , 2001 .

[10]  Phil Hancock,et al.  Non-technical skills in undergraduate degrees in business: Development and transfer , 2010 .

[11]  Katherine Harrington,et al.  Using Assessment Criteria to Support Student Learning , 2003 .

[12]  Norzaini Azman,et al.  Generic Skills Provision in Higher Education: A Malaysian Perspective , 2006 .

[13]  Judy C. Pearson,et al.  Why Communication Is Important: A Rationale for the Centrality of the Study of Communication. , 2000 .

[14]  Eddy Haryanto,et al.  Why Teacher Education? Documenting Undocumented Female Student Teachers’ Motives in Indonesia: A Case Study , 2017 .

[15]  Ann Hodgson,et al.  Keyskills for all? The key skills qualification and Curriculum 2000 , 2002 .

[16]  Amirul Mukminin,et al.  The Long Walk to Quality Teacher Education in Indonesia: Student Teachers’ Motives to become a Teacher and Policy Implications , 2017 .

[17]  Sara Hammer,et al.  Teaching generic skills: eroding the higher purpose of universities, or an opportunity for renewal? , 2008 .

[18]  B. Slife,et al.  Developing Problem-Solving Skills , 1985 .

[19]  Peter Washer,et al.  Revisiting Key Skills: A Practical Framework for Higher Education , 2007 .