Reconciling the solution and X-ray structures of the villin headpiece helical subdomain: molecular dynamics simulations and double mutant cycles reveal a stabilizing cation-pi interaction.

The 36-residue helical subdomain of the villin headpiece, HP36, is one of the smallest cooperatively folded proteins, folding on the microsecond time scale. The domain is an extraordinarily popular model system for both experimental and computational studies of protein folding. The structure of HP36 has been determined using X-ray crystallography and NMR spectroscopy, with the resulting structures exhibiting differences in helix packing, van der Waals contacts, and hydrogen bonding. It is important to determine the solution structure of HP36 with as much accuracy as possible since this structure is widely used as a reference for simulations and experiments. We complement the existing data by using all-atom molecular dynamics simulations with explicit solvent to evaluate which of the experimental models is the better representation of HP36 in solution. After simulation for 50 ns initiated with the NMR structure, we observed that the protein spontaneously adopts structures with a backbone conformation, core packing, and C-capping motif on the third helix that are more consistent with the crystal structure. We also examined hydrogen bonding and side chain packing interactions between D44 and R55 and between F47 and R55, respectively, which were observed in the crystal structure but not in the NMR-based solution structure. Simulations showed large fluctuations in the distance between D44 and R55, while the distance between F47 and R55 remained stable, suggesting the formation of a cation-pi interaction between those residues. Experimental double mutant cycles confirmed that the F47-R55 pair has a larger energetic coupling than the D44-R55 interaction. Overall, these combined experimental and computational studies show that the X-ray crystal structure is the better reference structure for HP36 in solution at neutral pH. Our analysis also shows how detailed molecular dynamics simulations combined with experimental validation can help bridge the gap between NMR and crystallographic methods.

[1]  V. Hornak,et al.  Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters , 2006, Proteins.

[2]  D. Raleigh,et al.  The unfolded state of the villin headpiece helical subdomain: computational studies of the role of locally stabilized structure. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  J. Hofrichter,et al.  Sub-microsecond protein folding. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  D. Raleigh,et al.  NMR characterization of a peptide model provides evidence for significant structure in the unfolded state of the villin headpiece helical subdomain. , 2006, Biochemistry.

[5]  D. Raleigh,et al.  Efficient high level expression of peptides and proteins as fusion proteins with the N-terminal domain of L9: application to the villin headpiece helical subdomain. , 2006, Protein expression and purification.

[6]  V. Pande,et al.  Using massively parallel simulation and Markovian models to study protein folding: examining the dynamics of the villin headpiece. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[7]  B. Zagrovic,et al.  Comparing atomistic simulation data with the NMR experiment: How much can NOEs actually tell us? , 2006, Proteins.

[8]  M. Troyer,et al.  Optimized parallel tempering simulations of proteins. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[9]  Holger Gohlke,et al.  The Amber biomolecular simulation programs , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[10]  D. Raleigh,et al.  Effect of modulating unfolded state structure on the folding kinetics of the villin headpiece subdomain. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Regine Herbst-Irmer,et al.  High-resolution x-ray crystal structures of the villin headpiece subdomain, an ultrafast folding protein. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  J. Hofrichter,et al.  Determination of ultrafast protein folding rates from loop formation dynamics. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  T. Herges,et al.  Free-energy landscape of the villin headpiece in an all-atom force field. , 2005, Structure.

[14]  Michael R. Shirts,et al.  Solvation free energies of amino acid side chain analogs for common molecular mechanics water models. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[15]  R. Tycko,et al.  Probing site-specific conformational distributions in protein folding with solid-state NMR. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  B. Bagchi,et al.  Sensitivity of polar solvation dynamics to the secondary structures of aqueous proteins and the role of surface exposure of the probe. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[17]  Bernard R Brooks,et al.  Isotropic periodic sum: a method for the calculation of long-range interactions. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[18]  C. Micheletti,et al.  Study of the Villin headpiece folding dynamics by combining coarse‐grained Monte Carlo evolution and all‐atom molecular dynamics , 2004 .

[19]  Harold A Scheraga,et al.  Folding of the villin headpiece subdomain from random structures. Analysis of the charge distribution as a function of pH. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  C. Ampe,et al.  Solution structures of the C‐terminal headpiece subdomains of human villin and advillin, evaluation of headpiece F‐actin‐binding requirements , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[21]  D. Raleigh,et al.  Peptide models provide evidence for significant structure in the denatured state of a rapidly folding protein: the villin headpiece subdomain. , 2004, Biochemistry.

[22]  R. Zhou Free energy landscape of protein folding in water: Explicit vs. implicit solvent , 2003, Proteins.

[23]  Erik Lindahl,et al.  Brute-force molecular dynamics simulations of Villin headpiece: Comparison with NMR parameters , 2003 .

[24]  Doug Barrick,et al.  Measuring the stability of partly folded proteins using TMAO , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[25]  J. Hofrichter,et al.  Experimental tests of villin subdomain folding simulations. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[26]  William Swope,et al.  Understanding folding and design: Replica-exchange simulations of ``Trp-cage'' miniproteins , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Yuefeng Tang,et al.  Dynamic NMR line-shape analysis demonstrates that the villin headpiece subdomain folds on the microsecond time scale. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[28]  Viktor Hornak,et al.  Using PC clusters to evaluate the transferability of molecular mechanics force fields for proteins , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[29]  Karl F Freed,et al.  All‐atom fast protein folding simulations: The villin headpiece , 2002, Proteins.

[30]  Michael R. Shirts,et al.  Simulation of folding of a small alpha-helical protein in atomistic detail using worldwide-distributed computing. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  B. Berne,et al.  Can a continuum solvent model reproduce the free energy landscape of a β-hairpin folding in water? , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  D. Raleigh,et al.  Temperature-dependent dynamics of the villin headpiece helical subdomain, an unusually small thermostable protein. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[33]  Martin Karplus,et al.  Application of the diffusion-collision model to the folding of three-helix bundle proteins. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[34]  C James McKnight,et al.  The role of aromatic residues in the hydrophobic core of the villin headpiece subdomain , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[35]  David C. Sullivan,et al.  Protein Folding as Biased Conformational Diffusion , 2002 .

[36]  I D Kuntz,et al.  Conformation spaces of proteins , 2001, Proteins.

[37]  Junmei Wang,et al.  How well does a restrained electrostatic potential (RESP) model perform in calculating conformational energies of organic and biological molecules? , 2000, J. Comput. Chem..

[38]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations of a Polyalanine Octapeptide under Ewald Boundary Conditions: Influence of Artificial Periodicity on Peptide Conformation , 2000 .

[39]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Effect of artificial periodicity in simulations of biomolecules under Ewald boundary conditions: a continuum electrostatics study. , 1999, Biophysical chemistry.

[40]  D. Raleigh,et al.  Nativelike structure and stability in a truncation mutant of a protein minidomain: the peripheral subunit-binding domain. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[41]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Ewald artifacts in computer simulations of ionic solvation and ion–ion interaction: A continuum electrostatics study , 1999 .

[42]  P. Kollman,et al.  Pathways to a protein folding intermediate observed in a 1-microsecond simulation in aqueous solution. , 1998, Science.

[43]  L Wang,et al.  The early stage of folding of villin headpiece subdomain observed in a 200-nanosecond fully solvated molecular dynamics simulation. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  D. W. Bolen,et al.  A naturally occurring protective system in urea-rich cells: mechanism of osmolyte protection of proteins against urea denaturation. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[45]  Paul T. Matsudaira,et al.  NMR structure of the 35-residue villin headpiece subdomain , 1997, Nature Structural Biology.

[46]  P S Kim,et al.  A thermostable 35-residue subdomain within villin headpiece. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[47]  D. A. Dougherty,et al.  Cation-π Interactions in Chemistry and Biology: A New View of Benzene, Phe, Tyr, and Trp , 1996, Science.

[48]  C. Pace,et al.  How to measure and predict the molar absorption coefficient of a protein , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[49]  P. Kollman,et al.  A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules , 1995 .

[50]  T. Darden,et al.  Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems , 1993 .

[51]  W. C. Still,et al.  Semianalytical treatment of solvation for molecular mechanics and dynamics , 1990 .

[52]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath , 1984 .

[53]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical features , 1983, Biopolymers.

[54]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[55]  G. Ciccotti,et al.  Numerical Integration of the Cartesian Equations of Motion of a System with Constraints: Molecular Dynamics of n-Alkanes , 1977 .

[56]  Ariel Fernández,et al.  Large-scale context in protein folding: villin headpiece. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[57]  Zhengshuang Shi,et al.  Stabilization of α‐helix structure by polar side‐chain interactions: Complex salt bridges, cation–π interactions, and C–H … O H‐bonds , 2001 .

[58]  D. A. Dougherty,et al.  Cation-pi interactions in structural biology. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[59]  A. R. Fresht Structure and Mechanism in Protein Science: A Guide to Enzyme Catalysis and Protein Folding , 1999 .

[60]  Ron Elber,et al.  MOIL-View - A Program for Visualization of Structure and Dynamics of Biomolecules and STO - A Program for Computing Stochastic Paths , 1995 .