Gravity field processing towards future LL-SST satellite missions

This study focuses in aspects concerning gravity field processing of future LL-SST satellite missions. Closed-loop simulations taking into account error models of new generation instrument technology, are used to estimate the gravity field accuracy that future missions could provide. Limiting factors are designated, and methods for their treatment are developed. The contribution of all error sources to the error budget is analyzed. It is shown that gravity field processing with double precision may be a limiting factor for exploiting the nm-level accuracy of a laser interferometer. An enhanced precision processing scheme is proposed instead, where double and quadruple precision is used in different parts of the processing chain. It is demonstrated that processing with enhanced precision can efficiently handle laser measurements and take full advantage of their accuracy, while keeping the computational times within reasonable levels. However, error sources of considerably larger impact are expected to affect future missions, with the accelerometer instrument noise and temporal aliasing effects being the most significant ones. The effect of time-correlated noise such as the one present at accelerometer measurements, can be efficiently handled by frequency dependent data weighting. Residual time series that contain the effect of system errors and propagated accelerometer and laser noise, is considered as a noise realization with stationary stochastic properties. The weight matrix is constructed from the auto-correlation functions of these residuals. Applying the weight matrix to a noise case considering all error sources, leads in reduction of the error levels over the complete bandwidth. Co-estimation of empirical accelerations does not show the same efficiency in reducing the propagated noise with the applied processing strategy. Temporal aliasing effects are reduced essentially by adding a second pair of satellites at an inclined orbit. Compared to a GRACE-type near-polar pair, a Bender-type constellation delivers solutions with major improvements in terms of de-aliasing potential and recovery performance. When the integrated effect of all geophysical processes is recovered, the maximum spatial resolution of 11-day solutions can be increased from 715 to 315 km half-wavelength. A further reduction of temporal aliasing errors is possible by co-parameterizing low resolution gravity fields at short time intervals, together with the higher resolution gravity field which is sampled at a longer time interval. One day was found to be the optimal sampling period for reducing the error levels in the solutions. A uniform sampling at the co-parameterized short periods, is a prerequisite for an efficient reduction of aliasing errors. High frequency atmospheric signals are captured by daily solutions to a large extent. Hence co-parameterization at daily basis results in big reduction of aliasing caused by their under-sampling. This enables future gravity satellite missions to deliver the complete spectrum of Earth's geophysical processes. The corresponding by-products of daily gravity field solutions are expected to be very useful to atmospheric science and open doors to new fields of applications.

[1]  A. Jäggi,et al.  The new combined satellite only model GOCO03s , 2012 .

[2]  R Jastrow,et al.  Satellite Orbits. , 1961, Science.

[3]  Chen Ji,et al.  Crustal Dilatation Observed by GRACE After the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake , 2006, Science.

[4]  Guillaume Ramillien,et al.  Earth System Mass Transport Mission (e.motion): A Concept for Future Earth Gravity Field Measurements from Space , 2013, Surveys in Geophysics.

[5]  W. M. Kaula Theory of satellite geodesy , 1966 .

[6]  M. Weigelt,et al.  An improved sampling rule for mapping geopotential functions of a planet from a near polar orbit , 2013, Journal of Geodesy.

[7]  Pieter Visser,et al.  Estimating low resolution gravity fields at short time intervals to reduce temporal aliasing errors , 2011 .

[8]  C. Shum,et al.  Time‐variable aliasing effects of ocean tides, atmosphere, and continental water mass on monthly mean GRACE gravity field , 2004 .

[9]  B. Tapley,et al.  Earth radiation pressure effects on satellites , 1988 .

[10]  J. Bamber,et al.  Seasonal variations in sea level induced by continental water mass: First results from GRACE , 2011 .

[11]  L. Prange Global Gravity Field Determination Using the GPS Measurements Made Onboard the Low Earth Orbiting Satellite CHAMP , 2010 .

[12]  David N. Wiese,et al.  A possible Dual-GRACE mission with 90 degree and 63 degree inclination orbits , 2008 .

[13]  Frank G. Lemoine,et al.  Design considerations for a dedicated gravity recovery satellite mission consisting of two pairs of satellites , 2012, Journal of Geodesy.

[14]  How to Climb the Gravity Wall , 2003 .

[15]  Rongjiang Wang,et al.  Gravity changes due to the Sumatra-Andaman and Nias earthquakes as detected by the GRACE satellites: a reexamination , 2010 .

[16]  L. Shampine,et al.  Computer solution of ordinary differential equations : the initial value problem , 1975 .

[17]  Nico Sneeuw,et al.  Science Requirements on Future Missions and Simulated Mission Scenarios , 2004 .

[18]  Isabella Velicogna,et al.  Time‐variable gravity observations of ice sheet mass balance: Precision and limitations of the GRACE satellite data , 2013 .

[19]  Roland Pail,et al.  Gravity field processing with enhanced numerical precision for LL-SST missions , 2014, Journal of Geodesy.

[20]  Thomas Gruber,et al.  Optimal orbits for temporal gravity recovery regarding temporal aliasing , 2014, Journal of Geodesy.

[21]  Leos Mervart,et al.  The celestial mechanics approach: application to data of the GRACE mission , 2010 .

[22]  Annette Eicker,et al.  Science and User Needs for Observing Global Mass Transport to Understand Global Change and to Benefit Society , 2015, Surveys in Geophysics.

[23]  K. Koch,et al.  Approximating covariance matrices estimated in multivariate models by estimated auto- and cross-covariances , 2010 .

[24]  D. Chambers,et al.  Hydrological and oceanic effects on polar motion from GRACE and models , 2010 .

[25]  Roland Klees,et al.  Frequency-dependent data weighting in global gravity field modeling from satellite data contaminated by non-stationary noise , 2006 .

[26]  William M. Folkner,et al.  Alternative mission architectures for a gravity recovery satellite mission , 2009 .

[27]  Byron D. Tapley,et al.  Interannual variability of Greenland ice losses from satellite gravimetry , 2011 .

[28]  Torsten Mayer-Gürr,et al.  EGM_TIM_RL05: An independent geoid with centimeter accuracy purely based on the GOCE mission , 2014 .

[29]  S. Gratton,et al.  GRACE-derived surface water mass anomalies by energy integral approach: application to continental hydrology , 2011 .

[30]  Bob E. Schutz,et al.  Glacial Isostatic Adjustment over Antarctica from combined ICESat and GRACE satellite data , 2009 .

[31]  R. Rummel,et al.  GOCE gravitational gradiometry , 2011 .

[32]  W. Yi The Earth’s gravity field from GOCE , 2012 .

[33]  Nico Sneeuw,et al.  Space-borne gravimetric satellite constellations and ocean tides: aliasing effects , 2010 .

[34]  L. P. Pellinen Physical Geodesy , 1972 .

[35]  W. H. Clohessy,et al.  Terminal Guidance System for Satellite Rendezvous , 2012 .

[36]  Richard D. Ray,et al.  A Global Ocean Tide Model From TOPEX/POSEIDON Altimetry: GOT99.2 , 1999 .

[37]  Jens Schröter,et al.  Global surface mass from a new combination of GRACE, modelled OBP and reprocessed GPS data , 2012 .

[38]  W. Bosch,et al.  EOT11A - Empirical Ocean Tide Model from Multi-Mission Satellite Altimetry , 2008 .

[39]  M. Sharifi,et al.  Future Mission Design Options for Spatio-Temporal Geopotential Recovery , 2010 .

[40]  H. Lühr,et al.  Swarm An Earth Observation Mission investigating Geospace , 2008 .

[41]  Frank Flechtner,et al.  Status of the GRACE Follow-On Mission , 2013 .