Pelvic and lower extremity veins: contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR venography with a dedicated vascular coil-initial experience.

PURPOSE To assess the performance of three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance (MR) venography of the pelvis and lower extremities in patients without acute deep venous thrombosis by using a lower extremity vascular coil and pedal injection of paramagnetic contrast material. MATERIALS AND METHODS Conventional and MR venography were performed in 35 legs in 25 patients referred for evaluation of varicosities (n = 8) and postthrombotic changes (n = 7) and assessment of the great saphenous veins prior to bypass surgery (n = 10). Injection of 120 mL of diluted (1:15) gadopentetate dimeglumine into a pedal vein was performed manually at a rate of 1 mL/sec, and 3D gradient-recalled echo data sets of the upper and lower veins were collected. Conventional and MR venographic images were analyzed separately in a blinded fashion. RESULTS MR image quality was comparable to that of conventional venograms. Varicose changes of the great and small saphenous veins (sensitivity, 94% [44 of 47]; specificity, 96% [89 of 93]) were assessed as reliably as their status before bypass surgery (sensitivity, 98% [53 of 54]; specificity, 92% [47 of 51]). Postthrombotic changes were diagnosed with a sensitivity of 100% [13 of 13] and a specificity of 98% [88 of 90]. CONCLUSION Direct 3D MR venography comprehensively displays the lower extremity venous system and permits assessment of postthrombotic and varicose changes and the bypass suitability of the saphenous vein.

[1]  J. Bakker,et al.  Renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries: accuracy of detection and visualization with gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography. , 1998, Radiology.

[2]  V B Ho,et al.  Thoracic MR aortography: imaging techniques and strategies. , 1998, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[3]  J. V. van Engelshoven,et al.  Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: evaluation with moving-bed infusion-tracking MR angiography. , 1998, Radiology.

[4]  J. Debatin,et al.  Evaluation of the aortoiliac and renal arteries: comparison of breath-hold, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional catheter angiography. , 1997, Radiology.

[5]  G A Holland,et al.  Breath-hold ultrafast three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the renovascular system. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  L. Axel,et al.  Gadolinium-enhanced ultrafast three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of the abdominal aorta and visceral and iliac vessels. , 1997, Radiographics.

[7]  M. Schnall,et al.  Magnetic resonance angiography of the aortic arch. , 1997, Journal of vascular surgery.

[8]  J. Debatin,et al.  Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the thoracic vasculature , 1997, European Radiology.

[9]  M. Prince,et al.  Arterial-phase three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid arteries. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  S. Flamm,et al.  MR imaging of the thoracic aorta. , 1996, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[11]  L. Axel,et al.  Breath-hold ultrafast three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the aorta and the renal and other visceral abdominal arteries. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  S. Wildermuth,et al.  MR venography of the calf: value of flow-enhanced time-of-flight echoplanar imaging. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  J. Brunberg,et al.  3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid arteries. , 1996, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[14]  T. Chenevert,et al.  Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches. , 1995, Radiology.

[15]  D C Harrison,et al.  Dynamic gadolinium‐enhanced three‐dimensional abdominal MR arteriography , 1993, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  C A Beam,et al.  1992 ARRS Executive Council Award. Detection of deep venous thrombosis: prospective comparison of MR imaging with contrast venography. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  P. Lanzer,et al.  Sequential 2D inflow venography: Initial clinical observations , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  H. Büller,et al.  Lower extremity venography with iohexol: results and complications. , 1990, Radiology.

[19]  R. Coleman,et al.  Deep venous thrombosis: experience with gradient-echo MR imaging in 66 patients. , 1990, Radiology.

[20]  G. Miller,et al.  Deep venous thrombosis of extremities: role of MR imaging in the diagnosis. , 1990, Radiology.

[21]  R. Herfkens,et al.  Deep venous thrombosis evaluation with limited-flip-angle, gradient-refocused MR imaging: preliminary experience. , 1988, Radiology.

[22]  M. Bettmann,et al.  Contrast venography of the leg: diagnostic efficacy, tolerance, and complication rates with ionic and nonionic contrast media. , 1987, Radiology.

[23]  J. Weinreb,et al.  Venous thrombosis: clinical and experimental MR imaging. , 1986, Radiology.

[24]  W. Shehadi Contrast media adverse reactions: occurrence, recurrence, and distribution patterns. , 1982, Radiology.

[25]  G. Toniolo,et al.  Adverse reactions to contrast media: a report from the Committee on Safety of Contrast Media of the International Society of Radiology. , 1980, Radiology.

[26]  D. Sackett,et al.  Observer variation in the interpretation of lower limb venograms. , 1979, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.