Conversion of canopy intercepted radiation to photosynthate: review of modelling approaches for regional scales.

A fundamental component of most models of terrestrial carbon balance is an estimate of plant canopy photosynthetic uptake driven by radiation interception by the canopy. In this article, we review approaches used to model the conversion of radiation into photosynthate. As this process is well understood at the leaf-scale, the modelling problem is essentially one of up-scaling, to canopy, regional or global scale. Our review therefore focuses on issues of scaling, including model identification, parameterisation and validation at large scales. Four different approaches are commonly taken to modelling photosynthate production at large scales: the maximum productivity, resource-use efficiency, big-leaf, and sun-shade models. Models representing each of these approaches are discussed and model predictions compared with estimates of gross primary productivity derived from eddy covariance data measured above a Sitka spruce forest. The sun-shade model was found to perform best at all time scales considered. However, other models had significant advantages including simplicity of implementation and the ability to combine the model with remotely-sensed information on vegetation radiation interception. We conclude that all four approaches can be successfully used to model photosynthetic uptake and that the best approach in a given situation will depend on model objectives and data availability.

[1]  R. Dewar The Correlation between Plant Growth and Intercepted Radiation: An Interpretation in Terms of Optimal Plant Nitrogen Content , 1996 .

[2]  W. Oechel,et al.  A scaling approach for quantifying the net CO2 flux of the Kuparuk River Basin, Alaska , 2000, Global change biology.

[3]  Claudio O. Stöckle,et al.  Canopy photosynthesis and transpiration estimates using radiation interception models with different levels of detail , 1992 .

[4]  A. Friend PGEN: an integrated model of leaf photosynthesis, transpiration, and conductance , 1995 .

[5]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Assessing forest productivity at local scales across a native eucalypt forest using a process model, 3PG-SPATIAL , 2001 .

[6]  David P. Turner,et al.  Comparison of alternative spatial resolutions in the application of a spatially distributed biogeochemical model over complex terrain , 1996 .

[7]  D. Pury,et al.  Simple scaling of photosynthesis from leaves to canopies without the errors of big‐leaf models , 1997 .

[8]  A. Bondeau,et al.  Comparing global models of terrestrial net primary productivity (NPP): analysis of differences in light absorption and light‐use efficiency , 1999 .

[9]  Yude Pan,et al.  The importance of climate and soils for estimates of net primary production: a sensitivity analysis with the terrestrial ecosystem model , 1996 .

[10]  R J Leipold,et al.  On the dangers of adjusting the parameters values of mechanism-based mathematical models. , 1996, Journal of theoretical biology.

[11]  C. Justice,et al.  A revised land surface parameterization (SiB2) for GCMs. Part III: The greening of the Colorado State University general circulation model , 1996 .

[12]  C. Field,et al.  A reanalysis using improved leaf models and a new canopy integration scheme , 1992 .

[13]  D. Barrett,et al.  NPP Multi-Biome: VAST Calibration Data, 1965-1998, R1 , 2001 .

[14]  Paul V. Bolstad,et al.  An approach to spatially distributed modeling of net primary production (NPP) at the landscape scale and its application in validation of EOS NPP products , 1999 .

[15]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Estimating forest productivity in the eastern Siskiyou Mountains of southwestern Oregon using a satellite driven process model, 3-PGS , 2001 .

[16]  M. Battaglia,et al.  Applying PROMOD spatially across Tasmania with sensitivity analysis to screen for prospective Eucalyptus globulus plantation sites , 2001 .

[17]  C. Spitters,et al.  Crop growth models: their usefulness and limitations. , 1990 .

[18]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Assessing forest productivity in Australia and New Zealand using a physiologically-based model driven with averaged monthly weather data and satellite-derived estimates of canopy photosynthetic capacity , 1998 .

[19]  P. Sands Modelling Canopy Production. II. From Single-Leaf Photosynthesis Parameters to Daily Canopy Photosynthesis , 1995 .

[20]  Antonio Donato Nobre,et al.  Acclimation of photosynthetic capacity to irradiance in tree canopies in relation to leaf nitrogen concentration and leaf mass per unit area , 2002 .

[21]  M. Werger,et al.  Canopy structure and leaf nitrogen distribution in a stand of Lysimachia vulgaris L. as influenced by stand density , 1988, Oecologia.

[22]  M. Battaglia,et al.  Data input quality and resolution effects on regional and local scale Eucalyptus globulus productivity predictions in north-east Tasmania , 2002 .

[23]  Andrew White,et al.  Evaluation and analysis of a dynamic terrestrial ecosystem model under preindustrial conditions at the global scale , 2000 .

[24]  W. Parton,et al.  TERRESTRIAL NPP: TOWARD A CONSISTENT DATA SET FORGLOBAL MODEL EVALUATION , 1999 .

[25]  M. Werger,et al.  Maximizing daily canopy photosynthesis with respect to the leaf nitrogen allocation pattern in the canopy , 1987, Oecologia.

[26]  Michael Battaglia,et al.  Modelling Site Productivity of Eucalyptus globulus in Response to Climatic and Site Factors , 1997 .

[27]  J. Aber,et al.  A generalized, lumped-parameter model of photosynthesis, evapotranspiration and net primary production in temperate and boreal forest ecosystems , 1992, Oecologia.

[28]  R. Loomis,et al.  Modeling crop photosynthesis - from biochemistry to canopy. , 1991 .

[29]  Ü. Rannik,et al.  Respiration as the main determinant of carbon balance in European forests , 2000, Nature.

[30]  G. Collatz,et al.  Profiles of photosynthetically active radiation, nitrogen and photosynthetic capacity in the boreal forest: Implications for scaling from leaf to canopy , 1997 .

[31]  D. Mummery,et al.  Application of process-based models to forest management: experience with PROMOD, a simple plantation productivity model. , 2000, Tree physiology.

[32]  Damian J. Barrett,et al.  Estimating regional terrestrial carbon fluxes for the Australian continent using a multiple-constraint approach I. Using remotely sensed data and ecological observations of net primary production , 2003 .

[33]  N. Coops,et al.  Estimating mean monthly incident solar radiation on horizontal and inclined slopes from mean monthly temperatures extremes , 2000, International journal of biometeorology.

[34]  W. Parton,et al.  Testing the ‘CENTURY’ ecosystem level model on data sets from eight grassland sites in the former USSR representing a wide climatic/soil gradient , 1997 .

[35]  J. Randerson,et al.  Terrestrial ecosystem production: A process model based on global satellite and surface data , 1993 .

[36]  D. Lawlor,et al.  The effects of drought on barley growth: models and measurements showing the relative importance of leaf area and photosynthetic rate , 1979, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[37]  Roger M. Gifford,et al.  Plant respiration in productivity models: conceptualisation, representation and issues for global terrestrial carbon-cycle research. , 2003, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[38]  Joe Landsberg,et al.  Physiological ecology of forest production , 1986 .

[39]  D. Randall,et al.  A Revised Land Surface Parameterization (SiB2) for Atmospheric GCMS. Part I: Model Formulation , 1996 .

[40]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  Linking a global terrestrial biogeochemical model and a 2‐dimensional climate model: implications for the global carbon budget , 1997 .

[41]  S. Goetz,et al.  Modelling Terrestrial Carbon Exchange and Storage: Evidence and Implications of Functional Convergence in Light-use Efficiency , 1999 .

[42]  Peter A. Coppin,et al.  Parameter estimation in surface exchange models using nonlinear inversion: how many parameters can we estimate and which measurements are most useful? , 2001 .

[43]  John Moncrieff,et al.  The propagation of errors in long‐term measurements of land‐atmosphere fluxes of carbon and water , 1996 .

[44]  R. Waring,et al.  A generalised model of forest productivity using simplified concepts of radiation-use efficiency, carbon balance and partitioning , 1997 .

[45]  C. Field,et al.  Allocating leaf nitrogen for the maximization of carbon gain: Leaf age as a control on the allocation program , 1983, Oecologia.

[46]  Scott V. Ollinger,et al.  Sources of Variability in Net Primary Production Predictions at a Regional Scale: A Comparison Using PnET-II and TEM 4.0 in Northeastern US Forests , 1999, Ecosystems.

[47]  Richard H. Waring,et al.  Environmental Limits on Net Primary Production and Light‐Use Efficiency Across the Oregon Transect , 1994 .

[48]  P. Reich,et al.  Extrapolating leaf CO2 exchange to the canopy: a generalized model of forest photosynthesis compared with measurements by eddy correlation , 1996, Oecologia.

[49]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Comparisons of predictions of net primary production and seasonal patterns in water use derived with two forest growth models in Southwestern Oregon , 2001 .

[50]  John S. Kimball,et al.  Sensitivity of boreal forest regional water flux and net primary production simulations to sub‐grid‐scale land cover complexity , 1999 .

[51]  J. R. Evans Photosynthetic Acclimation and Nitrogen Partitioning Within a Lucerne Canopy. I. Canopy Characteristics , 1993 .

[52]  James T. Randerson,et al.  Impulse response functions of terrestrial carbon cycle models: method and application , 1999 .

[53]  J. Berry,et al.  A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species , 1980, Planta.

[54]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  An integrated biosphere model of land surface processes , 1996 .

[55]  P. G. Jarvis,et al.  Productivity of temperate de-ciduous and evergreen forests , 1983 .

[56]  David W. Kicklighter,et al.  Modelling carbon responses of tundra ecosystems to historical and projected climate: sensitivity of pan‐Arctic carbon storage to temporal and spatial variation in climate , 2000, Global change biology.

[57]  D. Barrett,et al.  Quantifying uncertainty in estimates of C emissions from above‐ground biomass due to historic land‐use change to cropping in Australia , 2001 .

[58]  W. Parton,et al.  Global grassland ecosystem modelling: development and test of ecosystem models for grassland systems , 1996 .

[59]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  The use of multiscale remote sensing imagery to derive regional estimates of forest growth capacity using 3-PGS , 2001 .

[60]  E. Rastetter,et al.  Potential Net Primary Productivity in South America: Application of a Global Model. , 1991, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[61]  Changhui Peng,et al.  Simulating carbon dynamics along the Boreal Forest Transect Case Study (BFTCS) in central Canada: 1. Model testing , 1998 .

[62]  R. Leuning A critical appraisal of a combined stomatal‐photosynthesis model for C3 plants , 1995 .

[63]  T. Dejong,et al.  Seasonal relationships between leaf nitrogen content (photosynthetic capacity) and leaf canopy light exposure in peach (Prunus persica) , 1985 .

[64]  D. Bragg Potential relative increment (PRI): a new method to empirically derive optimal tree diameter growth , 2001 .

[65]  T. Vesala,et al.  Advantages of diffuse radiation for terrestrial ecosystem productivity , 2002 .

[66]  W. Post,et al.  Signal-transfer modeling for regional assessment of forest responses to environmental changes in the southeastern United States , 2000 .

[67]  I. Prentice,et al.  A general model for the light-use efficiency of primary production , 1996 .

[68]  R. Dewar,et al.  Soil processes dominate the long-term response of forest net primary productivity to increased temperature and atmospheric CO2 concentration. , 2000 .

[69]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  photosynthesis--nitrogen relationship in wild plants , 1986 .

[70]  A. McGuire,et al.  Global climate change and terrestrial net primary production , 1993, Nature.

[71]  M. Kirschbaum Modelling forest growth and carbon storage in response to increasing CO 2 and temperature , 1999 .

[72]  D. Eamus How does ecosystem water balance affect net primary productivity of woody ecosystems? , 2003, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[73]  P. Biscoe,et al.  Radiation absorption, growth and yield of cereals , 1978, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[74]  N. Coops,et al.  Estimation of potential forest productivity across the Oregon transect using satellite data and monthly weather records , 2001 .

[75]  W. Parton,et al.  Analysis of factors controlling soil organic matter levels in Great Plains grasslands , 1987 .

[76]  Vemap Participants Vegetation/ecosystem modeling and analysis project: Comparing biogeography and biogeochemistry models in a continental-scale study of terrestrial ecosystem responses to climate change and CO2 doubling , 1995 .

[77]  Scott V. Ollinger,et al.  Estimating regional forest productivity and water yield using an ecosystem model linked to a GIS , 1998, Landscape Ecology.

[78]  R. Leuning,et al.  A two-leaf model for canopy conductance, photosynthesis and partitioning of available energy I:: Model description and comparison with a multi-layered model , 1998 .

[79]  J. McGregor,et al.  Estimating regional terrestrial carbon fluxes for the Australian continent using a multiple-constraint approach II. The Atmospheric constraint , 2003 .

[80]  James R. Kercher,et al.  Parameter estimation for a global model of terrestrial biogeochemical cycling by an iterative method , 2001 .

[81]  P. Sands Modelling Canopy Production. I. Optimal Distribution of Photosynthetic Resources , 1995 .

[82]  P. Sands,et al.  Parameterisation of 3-PG for plantation grown Eucalyptus globulus , 2002 .

[83]  D. Baldocchi,et al.  CO2 fluxes over plant canopies and solar radiation: a review , 1995 .

[84]  Kurt H. Johnsen,et al.  Applying 3-PG, a Simple Process-Based Model Designed to Produce Practical Results, to Data from Loblolly Pine Experiments , 2001, Forestry sciences.

[85]  S. T. Gower,et al.  Direct and Indirect Estimation of Leaf Area Index, fAPAR, and Net Primary Production of Terrestrial Ecosystems , 1999 .

[86]  D. Hollinger Canopy organization and foliage photosynthetic capacity in a broad-leaved evergreen montane forest , 1989 .

[87]  J. Tenhunen,et al.  Modeling the effects of elevated CO2 on plants: extrapolating leaf response to a canopy , 1992 .

[88]  David W. Kicklighter,et al.  Equilibrium Responses of Soil Carbon to Climate Change: Empirical and Process-Based Estimates , 1995 .

[89]  G. Russell,et al.  Plant Canopies: Their Growth, Form and Function: Absorption of radiation by canopies and stand growth , 1989 .

[90]  B. Medlyn Physiological basis of the light use efficiency model. , 1998, Tree physiology.

[91]  Ross E. McMurtrie,et al.  Mathematical models of the photosynthetic response of tree stands to rising CO2 concentrations and temperatures , 1993 .

[92]  N. Coops,et al.  Performance of the forest productivity model 3-PG applied to a wide range of forest types , 2003 .

[93]  Graham D. Farquhar,et al.  Models of Integrated Photosynthesis of Cells and Leaves , 1989 .

[94]  P. Sands Modelling Canopy Production. III. Canopy Light-Utilisation Efficiency and Its Sensitivity to Physiological and Environmental Variables , 1996 .

[95]  J. Monteith Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain , 1977 .

[96]  P. Reich,et al.  Predicting the effects of climate change on water yield and forest production in the northeastern United States , 1995 .

[97]  C. Willmott ON THE VALIDATION OF MODELS , 1981 .

[98]  A. Friend,et al.  Modelling canopy CO2 fluxes: are ‘big‐leaf’ simplifications justified? , 2001 .

[99]  Ray Leuning,et al.  A two-leaf model for canopy conductance, photosynthesis and partitioning of available energy. II. Comparison with measurements , 1998 .

[100]  Robert J. Scholes,et al.  Observations and modeling of biomass and soil organic matter dynamics for the grassland biome worldwide , 1993 .

[101]  M. Kirschbaum,et al.  CenW, a forest growth model with linked carbon, energy, nutrient and water cycles , 1999 .