Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update.

PURPOSE To update the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing in breast cancer to improve the accuracy of HER2 testing and its utility as a predictive marker in invasive breast cancer. METHODS ASCO/CAP convened an Update Committee that included coauthors of the 2007 guideline to conduct a systematic literature review and update recommendations for optimal HER2 testing. RESULTS The Update Committee identified criteria and areas requiring clarification to improve the accuracy of HER2 testing by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or in situ hybridization (ISH). The guideline was reviewed and approved by both organizations. RECOMMENDATIONS The Update Committee recommends that HER2 status (HER2 negative or positive) be determined in all patients with invasive (early stage or recurrence) breast cancer on the basis of one or more HER2 test results (negative, equivocal, or positive). Testing criteria define HER2-positive status when (on observing within an area of tumor that amounts to >10% of contiguous and homogeneous tumor cells) there is evidence of protein overexpression (IHC) or gene amplification (HER2 copy number or HER2/CEP17 ratio by ISH based on counting at least 20 cells within the area). If results are equivocal (revised criteria), reflex testing should be performed using an alternative assay (IHC or ISH). Repeat testing should be considered if results seem discordant with other histopathologic findings. Laboratories should demonstrate high concordance with a validated HER2 test on a sufficiently large and representative set of specimens. Testing must be performed in a laboratory accredited by CAP or another accrediting entity. The Update Committee urges providers and health systems to cooperate to ensure the highest quality testing.

[1]  Mitch Dowsett,et al.  HER2 in situ hybridization in breast cancer: clinical implications of polysomy 17 and genetic heterogeneity , 2014, Modern Pathology.

[2]  E. Perez,et al.  Immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization assessment of HER2 in clinical trials of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer (NCCTG N9831, BCIRG 006, and BCIRG 005) , 2013, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[3]  E. Perez,et al.  Phase II randomized study of trastuzumab emtansine versus trastuzumab plus docetaxel in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  C. Earle,et al.  Closing the personalized medicine information gap: HER2 test documentation practice. , 2013, The American journal of managed care.

[5]  M. Zibelman,et al.  Seven-Year Follow-Up Assessment of Cardiac Function in NSABP B-31, a Randomized Trial Comparing Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Followed by Paclitaxel (ACP) With ACP Plus Trastuzumab As Adjuvant Therapy for Patients With Node-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Positive Breast Cancer , 2013 .

[6]  J. Baselga,et al.  Trastuzumab emtansine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  A. Thompson,et al.  Tissue confirmation of disease recurrence in breast cancer patients: pooled analysis of multi-centre, multi-disciplinary prospective studies. , 2012, Cancer treatment reviews.

[8]  L. Allen,et al.  Risk of Heart Failure in Breast Cancer Patients After Anthracycline and Trastuzumab Treatment: A Retrospective Cohort Study , 2012, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[9]  M. Hammond,et al.  Re: predictability of adjuvant trastuzumab benefit in N9831 patients using the ASCO/CAP HER2-positivity criteria. , 2012, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[10]  A. Goldhirsch,et al.  HER2-negative (1+) breast cancer with unfavorable prognostic features: to FISH or not to FISH? , 2012, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[11]  J. Bartlett,et al.  HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer: a rogues' gallery of challenging diagnostic cases: UKNEQAS interpretation guidelines and research recommendations. , 2012, American journal of clinical pathology.

[12]  E. Perez,et al.  Race and hormone receptor-positive breast cancer outcomes in a randomized chemotherapy trial. , 2012, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[13]  P. A. Futreal,et al.  Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  Jun Liu,et al.  Loss of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression in metastatic sites of HER2-overexpressing primary breast tumors. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  Janet I. Malowany,et al.  ‘Genetic heterogeneity’ in HER2/neu testing by fluorescence in situ hybridization: a study of 2522 cases , 2012, Modern Pathology.

[16]  E. Perez,et al.  Predictability of adjuvant trastuzumab benefit in N9831 patients using the ASCO/CAP HER2-positivity criteria. , 2012, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[17]  Sung-Bae Kim,et al.  Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel for metastatic breast cancer. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  Martin Krapcho,et al.  SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2009 (Vintage 2009 Populations) , 2012 .

[19]  D. Dabbs,et al.  High false-negative rate of HER2 quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction of the Oncotype DX test: an independent quality assurance study. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  J. Cuzick,et al.  Prognostic value of a combined estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, Ki-67, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemical score and comparison with the Genomic Health recurrence score in early breast cancer. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  L. Goldstein,et al.  Determining true HER2 gene status in breast cancers with polysomy by using alternative chromosome 17 reference genes: implications for anti-HER2 targeted therapy. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  W. Jochum,et al.  HER2 genetic heterogeneity in breast carcinoma , 2011, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[23]  Adrian Correa,et al.  Effects of the change in cutoff values for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization: a study comparing conventional brightfield microscopy, image analysis-assisted microscopy, and interobserver variation. , 2011, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[24]  Jong-Hyeon Jeong,et al.  Four-year follow-up of trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: joint analysis of data from NCCTG N9831 and NSABP B-31. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  V. Kataja,et al.  Very high quantitative tumor HER2 content and outcome in early breast cancer. , 2011, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[26]  Alastair I. Bartlett,et al.  Heterogeneous HER2 gene amplification: impact on patient outcome and a clinically relevant definition. , 2011, American journal of clinical pathology.

[27]  M. Hammond,et al.  Clinical Notice for American Society of Clinical Oncology-College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations on ER/PgR and HER2 testing in breast cancer. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  K. Goddard,et al.  HER2 Evaluation and Its Impact on Breast Cancer Treatment Decisions , 2011, Public Health Genomics.

[29]  A. Mulligan,et al.  The Effect of Prolonged Fixation on the Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and HER2 Expression in Invasive Breast Cancer: A Prospective Study , 2011, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[30]  R. Gelber,et al.  Treatment with trastuzumab for 1 year after adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer: a 4-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. , 2011, The Lancet. Oncology.

[31]  N. Collins,et al.  A UK NEQAS ISH multicenter ring study using the Ventana HER2 dual-color ISH assay. , 2011, American journal of clinical pathology.

[32]  R. Gelber,et al.  Abstract P3-10-36: Concordance of HER2 Central Assessment by Two International Central Laboratories: A Ring Study within the Framework of the Adjuvant HER2-Positive ALTTO Trial (BIG2-06/N063D/EGF106708) , 2010 .

[33]  E. Perez,et al.  HER2 and chromosome 17 effect on patient outcome in the N9831 adjuvant trastuzumab trial. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[34]  L. Goldstein,et al.  Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 assessment in a case-control study: comparison of fluorescence in situ hybridization and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction performed by central laboratories. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[35]  L. Rogers,et al.  Fixation time does not affect expression of HER2/neu: a pilot study. , 2010, American journal of clinical pathology.

[36]  E. Perez,et al.  Comparison of central HER2 testing with quantitative total HER2 expression and HER2 homodimer measurements using a novel proximity-based assay. , 2010, American journal of clinical pathology.

[37]  S. Gunn,et al.  Clinical array-based karyotyping of breast cancer with equivocal HER2 status resolves gene copy number and reveals chromosome 17 complexity , 2010, BMC Cancer.

[38]  M. Untch,et al.  Reliability of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemistry in breast core needle biopsies. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[39]  Paul M. Griffin,et al.  Impact of Clinical and Non-Clinical Factors on the Choice of HER2 Test for Breast Cancer , 2010, Cancer investigation.

[40]  Lynne Dobson,et al.  Image analysis as an adjunct to manual HER-2 immunohistochemical review: a diagnostic tool to standardize interpretation , 2010, Histopathology.

[41]  D Faratian,et al.  Quantitative analysis of changes in ER, PR and HER2 expression in primary breast cancer and paired nodal metastases. , 2010, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[42]  M. Dietel,et al.  Silver In Situ Hybridization (SISH) For Determination of HER2 Gene Status in Breast Carcinoma: Comparison With FISH and Assessment of Interobserver Reproducibility , 2010, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[43]  Anthony Rhodes,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. , 2010, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[44]  M. Bilous Breast core needle biopsy: issues and controversies , 2010, Modern Pathology.

[45]  M. Hammond,et al.  Variable specimen handling affects hormone receptor test results in women with breast cancer: a large multihospital retrospective study. , 2010, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[46]  T. D’alfonso,et al.  Accurately Assessing HER-2/neu Status in Needle Core Biopsies of Breast Cancer Patients in the Era of Neoadjuvant Therapy: Emerging Questions and Considerations Addressed , 2010, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[47]  J. Baselga,et al.  Open-label, phase II, multicenter, randomized study of the efficacy and safety of two dose levels of Pertuzumab, a human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 dimerization inhibitor, in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[48]  I. Ellis,et al.  Determination of HER2 amplification in primary breast cancer using dual-colour chromogenic in situ hybridization is comparable to fluorescence in situ hybridization: a European multicentre study involving 168 specimens , 2010, Histopathology.

[49]  S. Bianchi,et al.  Preoperative assessment of HER-2/neu status in breast carcinoma: the role of quantitative real-time PCR on core-biopsy specimens. , 2010, Gynecologic oncology.

[50]  I. Ellis,et al.  A UK NEQAS ICC and ISH multicentre study using the Kreatech Poseidon HER2 FISH probe: intersite variation can be rigorously controlled using FISH , 2010, Histopathology.

[51]  A. Concha,et al.  Real-Time RT-PCR Analysis for Evaluating the Her2/neu Status in Breast Cancer , 2010, Pathobiology.

[52]  K. Dookeran,et al.  Age/Race Differences in HER2 Testing and in Incidence Rates for Breast Cancer Triple Subtypes: A Population-Based Study and First Report: Lund MJ, Butler EN, Hair BY, et al (Emory Univ, Atlanta, Georgia; et al) Cancer 116:2549-2559, 2010 § , 2010 .

[53]  M. Smith,et al.  Evaluation of automated silver-enhanced in situ hybridization (SISH) for detection of HER2 gene amplification in breast carcinoma excision and core biopsy specimens , 2010 .

[54]  J. Bergh,et al.  HER2 status in a population-derived breast cancer cohort: discordances during tumor progression , 2010, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[55]  Janina Słodkowska,et al.  Study on breast carcinoma Her2/neu and hormonal receptors status assessed by automated images analysis systems: ACIS III (Dako) and ScanScope (Aperio). , 2010, Folia histochemica et cytobiologica.

[56]  Weidong Huang,et al.  Identification of a subpopulation of metastatic breast cancer patients with very high HER2 expression levels and possible resistance to trastuzumab. , 2011, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[57]  Z. Nemes,et al.  Comparison of Pathvysion and Poseidon HER2 FISH assays in measuring HER2 amplification in breast cancer: a validation study , 2009, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[58]  D. Mayr,et al.  Chromogenic in situ hybridization for Her‐2/neu‐oncogene in breast cancer: comparison of a new dual‐colour chromogenic in situ hybridization with immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization , 2009, Histopathology.

[59]  A. Nassar,et al.  Estimation of hormone receptor status and HER2 in cytologic cell blocks from breast cancer using the novel rabbit monoclonal antibodies (SP1, SP2, and SP3) , 2009, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[60]  M. Dowsett,et al.  Discordance between core needle biopsy (CNB) and excisional biopsy (EB) for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR) and HER2 status in early breast cancer (EBC). , 2009, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[61]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Loss of HER2 Amplification Following Trastuzumab-Based Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy and Survival Outcomes , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[62]  Yong Dai,et al.  Comparison of immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assessment for Her-2 status in breast cancer , 2009, World journal of surgical oncology.

[63]  Soonmyung Paik,et al.  Use of archived specimens in evaluation of prognostic and predictive biomarkers. , 2009, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[64]  M. J. van de Vijver,et al.  Microarray-Based Determination of Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and HER2 Receptor Status in Breast Cancer , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[65]  G. Wilding,et al.  Delay to formalin fixation effect on breast biomarkers , 2009, Modern Pathology.

[66]  A. Wolff,et al.  Reply to G. Sauter et al. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[67]  N. Sneige,et al.  Implementation of American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists HER2 Guideline Recommendations in a tertiary care facility increases HER2 immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization concordance and decreases the number of inconclusive cases. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[68]  Raymond R Tubbs,et al.  Genetic heterogeneity in HER2 testing in breast cancer: panel summary and guidelines. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[69]  A. Ashworth,et al.  Does chromosome 17 centromere copy number predict polysomy in breast cancer? A fluorescence in situ hybridization and microarray‐based CGH analysis , 2009, The Journal of pathology.

[70]  S. Gunn,et al.  Clinical validation of an array CGH test for HER2 status in breast cancer reveals that polysomy 17 is a rare event , 2009, Modern Pathology.

[71]  G. Birdsong,et al.  Immunohistochemical detection of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression in breast carcinomas , 2009, Cancer.

[72]  N. Sneige,et al.  Performance of chromogenic in situ hybridization on testing HER2 Status in breast carcinomas with chromosome 17 polysomy and equivocal (2+) herceptest results: a study of two institutions using the conventional and new ASCO/CAP scoring criteria. , 2009, American journal of clinical pathology.

[73]  Robert Pinard,et al.  Development of an Unsupervised Pixel-based Clustering Algorithm for Compartmentalization of Immunohistochemical Expression Using Automated QUantitative Analysis , 2009, Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM.

[74]  M. Henry,et al.  Automated cellular imaging system III for assessing HER2 status in breast cancer specimens: development of a standardized scoring method that correlates with FISH. , 2009, American journal of clinical pathology.

[75]  Mitch Dowsett,et al.  Disease-free survival according to degree of HER2 amplification for patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy with or without 1 year of trastuzumab: the HERA Trial. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[76]  G. Sauter,et al.  HER-2/neu analysis in breast cancer bone metastases , 2009, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[77]  J. Forteza,et al.  Whether to determine HER2 status for breast cancer in the primary tumour or in the metastasis. , 2009, Histology and histopathology.

[78]  G. Francis,et al.  Bright-field In Situ Hybridization for HER2 Gene Amplification in Breast Cancer Using Tissue Microarrays: Correlation Between Chromogenic (CISH) and Automated Silver-enhanced (SISH) Methods With Patient Outcome , 2009, Diagnostic molecular pathology : the American journal of surgical pathology, part B.

[79]  B. Rasmussen,et al.  The Correlation Between Dual-color Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Assessing HER2 Gene Amplification in Breast Cancer , 2009, Diagnostic molecular pathology : the American journal of surgical pathology, part B.

[80]  P. N. Rao,et al.  Comparison of fluorescent in situ hybridization HER-2/neu results on core needle biopsy and excisional biopsy in primary breast cancer , 2009, Modern Pathology.

[81]  W. Woodward,et al.  Even Low-level HER2 Expression May be Associated With Worse Outcome in Node-positive Breast Cancer , 2009, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[82]  D. Faratian,et al.  Rapid screening of tissue microarrays for Her‐2 fluorescence in situ hybridization testing is an accurate, efficient and economic method of providing an entirely in situ hybridization‐based Her‐2 testing service , 2009, Histopathology.

[83]  Yan Wang,et al.  Effect of High Copy Number of HER2 Associated With Polysomy 17 on HER2 Protein Expression in Invasive Breast Carcinoma , 2009, Diagnostic molecular pathology : the American journal of surgical pathology, part B.

[84]  Gaëtan MacGrogan,et al.  Prediction of HER2 gene status in Her2 2+ invasive breast cancer: a study of 108 cases comparing ASCO/CAP and FDA recommendations , 2009, Modern Pathology.

[85]  F. André,et al.  Fine‐needle aspiration for nucleic acid‐ased molecular analyses in breast cancer , 2009, Cancer.

[86]  D. Mayr,et al.  Comprehensive immunohistochemical analysis of Her-2/neu oncoprotein overexpression in breast cancer: HercepTest™ (Dako) for manual testing and Her-2/neuTest 4B5 (Ventana) for Ventana BenchMark automatic staining system with correlation to results of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) , 2009, Virchows Archiv.

[87]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  Automated Quantitative Assessment of HER-2/neu Immunohistochemical Expression in Breast Cancer , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[88]  S. Shousha,et al.  Evaluation of automated silver‐enhanced in situ hybridization (SISH) for detection of HER2 gene amplification in breast carcinoma excision and core biopsy specimens , 2009, Histopathology.

[89]  E. Slodkowska,et al.  Comparison of Quantitative Immunofluorescence With Conventional Methods for HER2/neu Testing With Respect to Response to Trastuzumab Therapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer , 2009 .

[90]  J. Reis-Filho,et al.  Rabbit antibodies for hormone receptors and HER2 evaluation in breast cancer. , 2009, Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira.

[91]  I. Ellis,et al.  External quality assurance of HER2 FISH and ISH testing: three years of the UK national external quality assurance scheme. , 2009, American journal of clinical pathology.

[92]  S. Teutsch,et al.  The Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) initiative: methods of the EGAPP Working Group , 2009, Genetics in Medicine.

[93]  P. Fitzgibbons,et al.  National HER2 proficiency test results using standardized quantitative controls: characterization of laboratory failures. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[94]  M. Fiorentino,et al.  Real Time RT-PCR Approach for the Evaluation of ERBB2 Overexpression in Breast Cancer Archival Samples: A Comparative Study With FISH, SISH, and Immunohistochemistry , 2008, Diagnostic molecular pathology : the American journal of surgical pathology, part B.

[95]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Determination of HER2 amplification by in situ hybridization: when should chromosome 17 also be determined? , 2008, American journal of clinical pathology.

[96]  M. Arbushites,et al.  HER-2 Gene Amplification, HER-2 and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor mRNA and Protein Expression, and Lapatinib Efficacy in Women with Metastatic Breast Cancer , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[97]  G. Botti,et al.  Delineation of HER2 gene status in breast carcinoma by silver in situ hybridization is reproducible among laboratories and pathologists. , 2008, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[98]  Patrick Neven,et al.  Polysomy 17 in breast cancer: clinicopathologic significance and impact on HER-2 testing. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[99]  K. Gelmon,et al.  Comparison of quantitative immunofluorescence with conventional methods for HER2/neu testing with respect to response to trastuzumab therapy in metastatic breast cancer. , 2008, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[100]  N. Nemoto,et al.  Application of Liquid-Based Preparation to Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in Breast Cancer , 2008, Acta Cytologica.

[101]  C. Bacchi,et al.  High Concordance of SP3 Rabbit Monoclonal Antibody With FISH to Evaluate HER2 in Breast Carcinoma , 2008, Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM.

[102]  Rohit Bhargava,et al.  Histopathologic variables predict Oncotype DX™ Recurrence Score , 2008, Modern Pathology.

[103]  N. Jhala,et al.  Using a higher cutoff for the percentage of HER2+ cells decreases interobserver variability in the interpretation of HER2 immunohistochemical analysis. , 2008, American journal of clinical pathology.

[104]  P. Regitnig,et al.  Practice of HER-2 Immunohistochemistry in Breast Carcinoma in Austria , 2008, Pathology & Oncology Research.

[105]  M. Dieci,et al.  Comparison of HER-2 and hormone receptor expression in primary breast cancers and asynchronous paired metastases: impact on patient management. , 2008, The oncologist.

[106]  David J. Foran,et al.  Computer-assisted assessment of the Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 immunohistochemical assay in imaged histologic sections using a membrane isolation algorithm and quantitative analysis of positive controls , 2008, BMC Medical Imaging.

[107]  D. Faratian,et al.  Tissue microarray technology in the routine assessment of HER‐2 status in invasive breast cancer: a prospective study of the use of immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization , 2008, Histopathology.

[108]  Matteo Brunelli,et al.  HER-2/neu assessment in breast cancer using the original FDA and new ASCO/CAP guideline recommendations: impact on selecting patients for herceptin therapy. , 2008, American journal of clinical pathology.

[109]  J. Reis-Filho,et al.  Comparative analysis of six different antibodies against Her2 including the novel rabbit monoclonal antibody (SP3) and chromogenic in situ hybridisation in breast carcinomas , 2008, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[110]  R. Osamura,et al.  Lower HER‐2/chromosome enumeration probe 17 ratio in cytologic HER‐2 fluorescence in situ hybridization for breast cancers , 2008, Cancer.

[111]  Rohit Bhargava,et al.  Clinical importance of HER2 immunohistologic heterogeneous expression in core-needle biopsies vs resection specimens for equivocal (immunohistochemical score 2+) cases , 2008, Modern Pathology.

[112]  S. Bosari,et al.  Quantitative PCR and HER2 testing in breast cancer: a technical and cost-effectiveness analysis. , 2008, American journal of clinical pathology.

[113]  E. Winer,et al.  Cardiac safety analysis of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel with or without trastuzumab in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group N9831 adjuvant breast cancer trial. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[114]  Jan P. A. Baak,et al.  Digital Image Analysis Improves the Quality of Subjective HER-2 Expression Scoring in Breast Cancer , 2008, Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM.

[115]  H. Mead,et al.  Racial and Ethnic Disparities in U.S. Health Care: A Chartbook , 2008 .

[116]  A. Chaudhuri,et al.  HER2 Status and Benefit from Adjuvant Trastuzumab in Breast Cancer , 2008 .

[117]  R. Tubbs,et al.  A new rabbit monoclonal antibody (4B5) for the immuno-histochemical (IHC) determination of the HER2 status in breast cancer: comparison with CB11, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and interlaboratory reproducibility. , 2008, Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM.

[118]  E. Lower,et al.  HER-2/neu expression in primary and metastatic breast cancer , 2008, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[119]  C. Sotiriou,et al.  Different prognostic value of cytokeratin-19 mRNA positive circulating tumor cells according to estrogen receptor and HER2 status in early-stage breast cancer. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[120]  I. Ellis,et al.  Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status correlates with lymph node involvement in patients with estrogen receptor (ER) negative, but with grade in those with ER-positive early-stage breast cancer suitable for cytotoxic chemotherapy. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[121]  F. Penault-Llorca,et al.  Comparison of different commercial kits for HER2 testing in breast cancer: looking for the accurate cutoff for amplification , 2007, Breast Cancer Research.

[122]  A. Mulligan,et al.  PGDS, A Novel Technique Combining Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization and Immunohistochemistry for the Assessment of ErbB2 (HER2/neu) Status in Breast Cancer , 2007, Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM.

[123]  P. Robbins,et al.  A comparison of immunohistochemical staining for oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and HER‐2 in breast core biopsies and subsequent excisions , 2007, Pathology.

[124]  Inti Zlobec,et al.  HER2 gene status in primary breast cancers and matched distant metastases , 2007, Breast Cancer Research.

[125]  M. Dowsett,et al.  Standardization of HER2 testing: results of an international proficiency-testing ring study , 2007, Modern Pathology.

[126]  J. Isola,et al.  Quantitative real-time PCR analysis and microarray-based RNA expression of HER2 in relation to outcome. , 2007, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[127]  J. Baak,et al.  Comparing subjective and digital image analysis HER2/neu expression scores with conventional and modified FISH scores in breast cancer , 2007, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[128]  Z. Nemes,et al.  Tissue microarray technology in breast cancer HER2 diagnostics. , 2007, Pathology, research and practice.

[129]  T. Grogan,et al.  A New Rabbit Monoclonal Antibody (4B5) for the Immunohistochemical (IHC) Determination of the HER2 Status in Breast Cancer: Comparison With CB11, Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH), and Interlaboratory Reproducibility , 2007, Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM.

[130]  J. Thiery,et al.  HER2 status of bone marrow micrometastasis and their corresponding primary tumours in a pilot study of 27 cases: a possible tool for anti-HER2 therapy management? , 2007, British Journal of Cancer.

[131]  David Cameron,et al.  2-year follow-up of trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer: a randomised controlled trial , 2007, The Lancet.

[132]  N. Maggiano,et al.  Borderline HER‐2 breast cancer cases: Histochemical versus real‐time PCR analysis and impact of different cut‐off values , 2007, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation.

[133]  F. Schmitt,et al.  HER2 evaluation using the novel rabbit monoclonal antibody SP3 and CISH in tissue microarrays of invasive breast carcinomas , 2006, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[134]  M. Kissin,et al.  Chromogenic in situ hybridisation (CISH) should be an accepted method in the routine diagnostic evaluation of HER2 status in breast cancer , 2006, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[135]  Anthony Rhodes,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. , 2006, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[136]  J. Stachura,et al.  Evaluation of HER2/neu gene amplification in patients with invasive breast carcinoma. Comparison of in situ hybridization methods. , 2007, Polish journal of pathology : official journal of the Polish Society of Pathologists.

[137]  M. J. van de Vijver,et al.  Chromogenic in situ hybridisation for the assessment of HER2 status in breast cancer: an international validation ring study , 2007, Breast Cancer Research.

[138]  R. Kodet,et al.  A modified approach for I-FISH evaluation of ERBB2 (HER-2) gene copy numbers in breast carcinomas: comparison with HER-2/CEP17 ratio system , 2007, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[139]  M. Berger,et al.  Lapatinib plus capecitabine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[140]  T. Grogan,et al.  Automation of Manual Components and Image Quantification of Direct Dual Label Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) for HER2 Gene Amplification: A Feasibility Study , 2006, Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM.

[141]  A. Bednarek,et al.  A comparative assessment of HER2 status in operable breast cancer by real-time RT-PCR and by immunohistochemistry. , 2006, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[142]  R. West,et al.  Evaluation of Her-2/neu status in carcinomas with amplified chromosome 17 centromere locus. , 2006, American journal of clinical pathology.

[143]  F. Marandino,et al.  Chromogenic in situ hybridization to detect HER-2/neu gene amplification in histological and ThinPrep-processed breast cancer fine-needle aspirates: a sensitive and practical method in the trastuzumab era. , 2006, The oncologist.

[144]  M. A. Seguí,et al.  HER-2 gene amplification by chromogenic in situ hybridisation (CISH) compared with fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) in breast cancer-A study of two hundred cases. , 2006, Breast.

[145]  Peter A Kaufman,et al.  HER2 testing by local, central, and reference laboratories in specimens from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group N9831 intergroup adjuvant trial. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[146]  P. Klein,et al.  Concordance between central and local laboratory HER2 testing from a community-based clinical study. , 2006, Clinical breast cancer.

[147]  K. Kwok,et al.  Chromogenic in-situ hybridization: a viable alternative to fluorescence in-situ hybridization in the HER2 testing algorithm , 2006, Modern Pathology.

[148]  J. Griggs,et al.  Influence of health insurance status on inclusion of HER-2/neu testing in the diagnostic workup of breast cancer patients. , 2004, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[149]  R. Mayberry,et al.  Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[150]  D. Arber Effect of Prolonged Formalin Fixation on the Immunohistochemical Reactivity of Breast Markers , 2002, Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM.

[151]  Adrienne Y. Stith,et al.  Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. , 2003 .

[152]  T. Fleming,et al.  Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.