Anaesthesia record system on handheld computers - pilot experience and uses for quality control and clinical guidelines

This paper describes a mobile information system to collect patient information for anesthesia quality control. In this system, a mobile database program was designed for use on handheld computers (Pocket PC). This program is used to collect patient data at the bedside on the handhelds, with a daily synchronization of the data between the anaesthesiologists' handhelds with the anaesthesia database. All collected data are later used for quality control analysis. Furthermore, clinical guidelines will be included on these same handhelds. During the pilot phase, data from a sample set of about 300 patients were incorporated. The processes and interfaces of the system are presented in the paper. The current mobile database system has been designed to replace the original paper-based data collection system. The individual anaesthesiologist's handheld synchronizes patient data daily with anaesthesia database center. This information database is analyzed and used not only to give feedback to the individual doctor or center, but also to review the use of the guidelines provided and the results of their utilization.

[1]  Takashi Andou,et al.  Emergency Image Transfer System through a Mobile Telephone in Japan: Technical Note , 2003, Neurosurgery.

[2]  Ralph Mösges,et al.  The use of handheld computers in clinical trials. , 2002, Controlled clinical trials.

[3]  M. Field,et al.  Practice guidelines and quality of care. , 1994, Journal of the National Medical Association.

[4]  M R Ventura,et al.  Lessons learned in implementing a staff education program in pain management in the acute care setting. , 1997, Journal of nursing staff development : JNSD.

[5]  F Wagner Control and quality assurance in anaesthesia with a PDMS , 1997, International journal of clinical monitoring and computing.

[6]  W. Hammond,et al.  Computerized decision support based on a clinical practice guideline improves compliance with care standards. , 1997, The American journal of medicine.

[7]  M. Field,et al.  Medical practice guidelines: current activities and future directions. , 1990, Annals of internal medicine.

[8]  Louis M Porn,et al.  Mobile computing acceptance grows as applications evolve. , 2002, Healthcare financial management : journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association.

[9]  John Fox,et al.  Disseminating medical knowledge: the PROforma approach , 1998, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[10]  Barry Smith,et al.  Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium , 2005 .

[11]  M P Smith,et al.  The anesthesiologist's guide to Palm Computing. , 1999, Regional anesthesia and pain medicine.

[12]  Nick Booth,et al.  The PRODIGY project-the iterative development of the release one model , 1999, AMIA.

[13]  V. Patel,et al.  Analysis of the process of encoding guidelines: a comparison of GLIF2 and GLIF3. , 2002, Methods of information in medicine.

[14]  David F. Lobach,et al.  Structuring clinical practice guidelines in a relational database model for decision support on the Internet , 1997, AMIA.

[15]  G Mosser,et al.  Establishing a central structure for supporting guideline implementation. , 1996, Medical interface.

[16]  S E Gisvold,et al.  [Registration of problems during anesthesia. Analysis of risk factors and quality control]. , 1990, Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke.

[17]  S. Moulton,et al.  Desktop and mobile software development for surgical practice. , 2002, Journal of pediatric surgery.