In situ catalyst activity control in a novel membrane reactor-Reaction driven wireless electrochemical promotion of catalysis

Abstract A dual chamber membrane reactor was used in order to study the effect of macroscopically applied oxygen chemical potential differences to a platinum catalyst supported on a mixed oxygen ion and electronic conducting membrane. It is believed that the oxygen chemical potential difference imposed by the use of an oxygen sweep in one of the reactor chambers causes the back-spillover of oxygen species from the support onto the catalyst surface, resulting in the modification of the catalytic activity. The use of different sweep gases, such as ethylene and hydrogen was investigated as the means to reverse the rate modification by removing the spilt over species from the catalyst surface and returning the system to its initial state. Oxygen sweep in general had a positive effect on the reaction rate with rate increases up to 20% measured. Experimental results showed that hydrogen is a more potent sweep gas than ethylene in terms of the ability to reverse rate modification. A 10% rate loss was observed when using an ethylene sweep as compared with an almost 60% rate decrease when hydrogen was used as the sweep gas.

[1]  C. Vayenas,et al.  Non-Faradaic Electrochemical Modification of Catalytic Activity 9. Ethylene Oxidation on Pt Deposited on TiO2 , 1996 .

[2]  G. Marnellos,et al.  Synthesis of Ammonia at Atmospheric Pressure with the Use of Solid State Proton Conductors , 2000 .

[3]  Danai Poulidi,et al.  Electrochemical promotion of catalysis controlled by chemical potential difference across a mixed ionic-electronic conducting ceramic membrane – an example of wireless NEMCA , 2007 .

[4]  A. Thursfield,et al.  Electrochemical promotion of catalysis using solid-state proton-conducting membranes , 2003 .

[5]  E. Siebert,et al.  In-situ electrochemical control of the catalytic activity of platinum for the propene oxidation , 2004 .

[6]  C. Vayenas,et al.  Electrochemical Promotion of Ethylene Oxidation on Pt Catalyst Films Deposited on CeO2 , 1998 .

[7]  Danai Poulidi,et al.  Comparative studies between classic and wireless electrochemical promotion of a Pt catalyst for ethylene oxidation , 2008 .

[8]  C. Vayenas,et al.  Rules and Mathematical Modeling of Electrochemical and Chemical Promotion: 1. Reaction Classification and Promotional Rules , 2001 .

[9]  G. Karagiannakis,et al.  Effect of H2O presence on the propane decomposition reaction over Pd in a proton conducting membrane reactor , 2006 .

[10]  William J. Weber,et al.  Electrochemical properties of mixed conducting perovskites La{sub 1{minus}x}M{sub x}Co{sub 1{minus}y}Fe{sub y}O{sub 3{minus}{delta}} (M = Sr, Ba, Ca) , 1996 .

[11]  Danai Poulidi,et al.  Remote control of the activity of a Pt catalyst supported on a mixed ionic electronic conducting membrane , 2008 .

[12]  A. Thursfield,et al.  Electrochemical Promotion of Ethylene Oxidation over Rh Catalyst Thin Films Sputtered on YSZ and TiO2 / YSZ Supports , 2005 .

[13]  William J. Weber,et al.  Electrochemical Properties of Mixed Conducting Perovskites La1 − x M x Co1 − y Fe y O 3 − δ (M = Sr, Ba, Ca) , 1996 .

[14]  S. Bebelis,et al.  Electrochemical promotion of heterogeneous catalysis , 1999 .

[15]  S. Teichner Recent studies in hydrogen and oxygen spillover and their impact on catalysis , 1990 .

[16]  C. Vayenas,et al.  The effect of catalyst film thickness on the magnitude of the electrochemical promotion of catalytic reactions , 2006 .

[17]  S. Bebelis,et al.  Electrochemical promotion in catalysis: non-faradaic electrochemical modification of catalytic activity , 1994 .