Automated identification of miscoded and misclassified cases of diabetes from computer records

Diabet. Med. 29, 410–414 (2012)

[1]  V. Basevi.  Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2010 , 2010, Diabetes Care.

[2]  Tom Chan,et al.  Using surrogate markers in primary electronic patient record systems to confirm or refute the diagnosis of diabetes. , 2009, Informatics in primary care.

[3]  Y. Jang,et al.  Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2010 by the American Diabetes Association: Prevention and Management of Cardiovascular Disease , 2010 .

[4]  S de Lusignan,et al.  Management of heart failure in primary care after implementation of the National Service Framework for Coronary Heart Disease: a cross-sectional study. , 2005, Public health.

[5]  Simon de Lusignan,et al.  Ensuring the Quality of Aggregated General Practice Data: Lessons from the Primary Care Data Quality Programme (PCDQ) , 2005, MIE.

[6]  Simon de Lusignan,et al.  Variation in clinical coding lists in UK general practice: a barrier to consistent data entry? , 2007, Informatics in primary care.

[7]  Henrik Ohlsson,et al.  Open Access Research Article Validity of Registration of Icd Codes and Prescriptions in a Research Database in Swedish Primary Care: a Cross-sectional Study in Skaraborg Primary Care Database , 2022 .

[8]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[9]  S. de Lusignan,et al.  The QICKD study protocol: a cluster randomised trial to compare quality improvement interventions to lower systolic BP in chronic kidney disease (CKD) in primary care , 2009, Implementation science : IS.

[10]  S de Lusignan,et al.  Quality and variability of osteoporosis data in general practice computer records: implications for disease registers. , 2005, Public health.

[11]  Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus and Other Categories of Glucose Intolerance , 1979, Diabetes.

[12]  Simon de Lusignan,et al.  Flagging fasting plasma glucose specimens: time to routinely label the context in which pathology specimens are recorded. , 2009, Informatics in primary care.

[13]  S. de Lusignan,et al.  A system of metadata to control the process of query, aggregating, cleaning and analysing large datasets of primary care data. , 2005, Informatics in primary care.

[14]  P. Zimmet,et al.  Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Provisional report of a WHO Consultation , 1998, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[15]  Simon de Lusignan,et al.  Routinely-collected general practice data are complex, but with systematic processing can be used for quality improvement and research. , 2006, Informatics in primary care.

[16]  J. Shaffer.  Multiple Hypothesis Testing , 1995 .

[17]  S. de Lusignan,et al.  An eight-step method for assessing diagnostic data quality in practice: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as an exemplar. , 2004, Informatics in primary care.

[18]  Simon de Lusignan,et al.  Viewpoint Paper: e-Prescribing, Efficiency, Quality: Lessons from the Computerization of UK Family Practice , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[19]  S. de Lusignan,et al.  A method of identifying and correcting miscoding, misclassification and misdiagnosis in diabetes: a pilot and validation study of routinely collected data , 2010, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[20]  S. de Lusignan,et al.  Creatinine Fluctuation Has a Greater Effect than the Formula to Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate on the Prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease , 2010, Nephron Clinical Practice.