The importance of teacher–student interpersonal relationships for Turkish students’ attitudes towards science

The purpose of this study was to examine associations between Turkish high school students’ perceptions of their science teachers’ interpersonal behaviour and their attitudes towards science. Students’ perceptions of the teacher–student interpersonal relationship were mapped with the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction (QTI), which uses two relational dimensions: influence and proximity. Data on Students’ subject‐related attitudes were collected with the Test of Science Related Attitudes (TOSRA). A total of 7484 students (Grades 9 to 11) from 278 science classes (55 public schools) in 13 major Turkish cities participated in the study. Multilevel analyses of variance indicated that influence was related with student enjoyment, while proximity was associated with attitudes towards inquiry and with enjoyment.

[1]  APPLICATION OF A QUESTIONNAIRE TO DESCRIBE TEACHER COMMUNICATION BEHAVIOUR AND ITS ASSOCIATION WITH STUDENTS IN SCIENCE IN TURKEY , 2004 .

[2]  Michalinos Zembylas,et al.  The Effect of Attitudes on Science Achievement: A Study Conducted Among High School Pupils in Cyprus , 2002 .

[3]  den Pj Perry Brok,et al.  Turkish secondary education students' perceptions of their classroom learning environment and their attitude towards Biology , 2006 .

[4]  P. Brok,et al.  Students’ perceptions of science teachers’ interpersonal behaviour in secondary schools: Development of a Turkish version of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction , 2007 .

[5]  Mieke Brekelmans,et al.  An Interpersonal Perspective on Classroom Management in Secondary Classrooms in the Netherlands. , 2006 .

[6]  Edgar W. Jenkins,et al.  Important but not for me: students’ attitudes towards secondary school science in England , 2005 .

[7]  Frederick S. Breed,et al.  Classroom organization and management , 1934 .

[8]  P. Brok,et al.  Multilevel issues in research using students’ perceptions of learning environments: The case of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction , 2006 .

[9]  R. D. de Jong,et al.  The quality of student ratings of teacher behaviour , 2001 .

[10]  Leonidas Kyriakides,et al.  Extending the Comprehensive Model of Educational Effectiveness by an Empirical Investigation , 2005 .

[11]  Barry J. Fraser,et al.  LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH: YESTERDAY, TODAY AND TOMORROW , 2002 .

[12]  Mieke Brekelmans,et al.  TWO DECADES OF RESEARCH ON TEACHER–STUDENT RELATIONSHIPS IN CLASS , 2005 .

[13]  S. Veenman.  Perceived Problems of Beginning Teachers , 1984 .

[14]  Barry J. Fraser,et al.  Classroom Learning Environments , 2003 .

[15]  M. Brekelmans,et al.  A study of student perceptions of physics teacher behavior , 1990 .

[16]  L. E. Klopfer.  A structure for the affective domain in relation to science education , 1976 .

[17]  Jeffrey H. D. Cornelius-White.  Learner-Centered Teacher-Student Relationships Are Effective: A Meta-Analysis , 2007 .

[18]  Darrell Fisher,et al.  The importance of teacher interpersonal behaviour for student attitudes in Brunei primary science classes , 2005 .

[19]  T. Wubbels,et al.  A comparison of interpersonal behavior of Dutch and American teachers , 1991 .

[20]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[21]  Ghali Hassan,et al.  Attitudes toward science among Australian tertiary and secondary school students , 2008 .

[22]  Cengiz Alacaci,et al.  Unpacking the inequality among Turkish schools: Findings from PISA 2006 , 2010 .

[23]  Feyzi Osman Pekel,et al.  Biology Teachers' Attitudes and Communication Behavior in Turkey: From the View Point of Their Students. , 2006 .

[24]  Bert P. M. Creemers,et al.  The Effective Classroom , 1994 .

[25]  J. Brophy.  Classroom Organization and Management , 1983, The Elementary School Journal.

[26]  Barry J. Fraser,et al.  Teacher Interpersonal Behaviour, Classroom Environment and Student Outcomes in Primary Mathematics in Singapore , 1998 .

[27]  E. Jenkins,et al.  “Me and the Environmental Challenges”: A survey of English secondary school students’ attitudes towards the environment , 2006 .

[28]  N. Reid,et al.  Working memory and attitudes , 2009 .

[29]  L. Kyriakides,et al.  Critical analysis of the current approaches to modelling educational effectiveness: The importance of establishing a dynamic model , 2006 .

[30]  Darrell L. Fisher,et al.  The importance of teacher interpersonal behaviour for secondary science students in Kashmir. , 2005 .

[31]  Sarem Özdemir.  Affects of Television as a Natural Educator: Can Television be a Tool as an Informal Educator? A TRNC Sample. , 2006 .

[32]  Mike Allen,et al.  The Role of Teacher Immediacy as a Motivational Factor in Student Learning: Using Meta-Analysis to Test a Causal Model , 2006 .

[33]  T. Wubbels.  Discipline Problems of Beginning Teachers, Interactional Teacher Behaviour Mapped Out. , 1985 .

[34]  Mieke Brekelmans,et al.  Interpersonal Teacher Behaviour and Student Outcomes , 2004 .

[35]  Jack Levy,et al.  Do You Know What You Look Like?: Interpersonal Relationships In Education , 1993 .

[36]  Dale R. Baker,et al.  If I were the teacher … qualitative study of attitude toward science , 1993 .

[37]  Darrell L. Fisher,et al.  Students' perceptions of primary teachers' interpersonal behaviour and of cultural dimensions in the classroom environment. , 2005 .

[38]  S. Simon,et al.  Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications , 2003 .

[39]  R. Coll,et al.  The influence of educational context on science learning: a cross‐national analysis of PISA , 2010 .

[40]  den Pj Perry Brok,et al.  The effect of teacher interpersonal behaviour on students' subject-specific motivation , 2005 .

[41]  Svein Sjøberg,et al.  How Do Learners in Different Cultures Related to Science and Technology? Results and Perspectives from the Project Rose (The Relevance of Science Education). , 2005 .