An Approach to Developing a Performance Brief at the Project Inception Stage

Abstract The project inception stage has been the focus of intense research activity in design, project management and facilities management for a number of years. The need to establish the project parameters and performance requirements has been an imperative in many organizations, and facilities managers have been leaders in this process. Pre-design processes and activities are being instituted that work through the client's strategic and organizational issues, needs and requirements before the design team is involved. The participation of stakeholders in pre-design workshops is a common feature of these project inception approaches. These approaches prepare a clear and workable statement of the project requirements in performance terms that the client and user groups have committed themselves to. This strategic brief (or definition of the business case of the organization) can then provide a sound basis for the documentation of the needs and the development of the design. One approach to these early stages of the project is strategic needs analysis. This study describes the use of strategic needs analysis in a community library project where stakeholders from the client organization were involved in workshops to discuss, propose and identify strategic options for the library. Two computer programs assisted in this application—Situation Structuring and Strategizer. In the former, a problem-structuring approach was used to categorize performance indicators that were grouped into the final set of options. Strategizer is a dedicated interactive decision-making program that assists individual stakeholders in ranking the chosen options. The identification of performance indicators established by the stakeholders during the strategic needs analysis is an important part of the project inception process and these performance indicators formed the basis of the final performance brief, part of which is illustrated in this paper.

[1]  Jim Smith,et al.  Digital simulation of option-choice behaviour , 2000 .

[2]  Karl R. Popper,et al.  The Myth of the Framework , 1994 .

[3]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  Soft Systems Methodology in Action , 1991 .

[4]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  A critical appraisal of the briefing process in construction , 2001 .

[5]  Ray Wyatt.  Computer-aided policymaking : lessons from strategic planning software , 1999 .

[6]  K. Lewin,et al.  The Action Research Planner , 2003 .

[7]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making for leaders , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[8]  Derek S. Drew,et al.  Value Management in Construction , 2007 .

[9]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  An exploration towards a production theory and its application to construction , 2000 .

[10]  Will Hughes,et al.  Building Design Management , 2001 .

[11]  Jim Smith,et al.  Strategic needs analysis: its role in brief development , 2000 .

[12]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[13]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Book Reviews : Scientific Opportunities and Public Needs: Improv ing Priority Setting and Public Input at the National Institutes of Health. Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1998, 136 pages, $26.00 , 1998 .

[14]  Stuart D. Green.  The essentials of value engineering , 1990 .

[15]  S. T. Kometa,et al.  Evaluation of Factors Influencing Construction Clients’ Decision to Build , 1997 .

[16]  John Kelly,et al.  Value Management in Design and Construction , 1993 .

[17]  Michael W. Nicholson,et al.  Rational Analysis for a Problematic World , 1990 .

[18]  Tony Hindle,et al.  Rational Analysis for a Problematic World , 1990 .

[19]  Stuart D. Green.  A SMART methodology for value management , 1992 .

[20]  Earl R. Babbie,et al.  The practice of social research , 1969 .

[21]  John Bennett,et al.  The successful management of design: a handbook of building design management , 1994 .

[22]  Nathaniel Lichfield,et al.  Evaluation in the planning process , 1975 .

[23]  Stuart D. Green.  A metaphorical analysis of client organizations and the briefing process , 1996 .

[24]  P. Olomolaiye,et al.  An evaluation of clients' needs and responsibilities in the construction process , 1995 .

[25]  F. David,et al.  Strategic management , 1986 .

[26]  R. M. Woodhead.  Investigation of the early stages of project formulation , 2000 .

[27]  Lawrence D. Miles,et al.  Techniques Of Value Analysis And Engineering , 1961 .

[28]  Andrew N. Baldwin,et al.  Analytical design planning technique (ADePT): a dependency structure matrix tool to schedule the building design process , 2000 .

[29]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Stakeholder Management during Project Inception: Strategic Needs Analysis , 2004 .

[30]  Ray Wyatt,et al.  Using Neural Networks for Generic Strategic Planning , 1995, ICANNGA.

[31]  D. A. Conway,et al.  The Art of Problem Solving , 1978 .

[32]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Building Design Cost Management , 2002 .

[33]  Jim Smith,et al.  A method for strategic client briefing , 2003 .

[34]  T. Rickards.  Creativity and problem solving at work , 1990 .

[35]  Karl Raimund Sir Popper,et al.  The Myth of the Framework : In Defence of Science and Rationality , 1997 .

[36]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Philosophical Differences: The Case of Architects' Reluctance to Use Strategic Planning Software , 2004 .

[37]  Stuart D. Green.  Group decision support for value management , 1996 .

[38]  Jim Smith,et al.  The decision to build and the organisation , 2002 .

[39]  Ernest H. Forman,et al.  Multi Criteria Decision Making and the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[40]  Sumantra Ghoshal,et al.  The Strategy Process: Concepts, Contexts, Cases , 1991 .

[41]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  Client Requirements Processing in Construction: A New Approach Using QFD , 1999 .

[42]  Jiaqin Yang,et al.  AN AHP DECISION MODEL FOR FACILITY LOCATION SELECTION , 1997 .