On Funtowicz and Ravetz's “Decision Stake—System Uncertainties” Structure and Recently Developed Risk Perspectives

The Funtowicz and Ravetz model for classifying problem-solving strategies into applied sciences, professional consultancy, and postnormal sciences is well known in the social science risk literature. The model is illustrated in a diagram based on the two axes: (i) decision stakes-the value dimension (costs, benefits) and (ii) the system uncertainties-the knowledge dimension. These axes resemble the same two dimensions that characterize some recently developed risk perspectives: (a) consequences and the severity of these consequences and (b) associated uncertainties. In this article, we make a detailed comparison of these two types of risk frameworks. We point to similarities and differences in motivation and use. A main conclusion of the article is that these risk perspectives all provide adequate scientific bases for the Funtowicz and Ravetz model. New insights are provided on the understanding of what the outcome stakes/consequences and uncertainty dimensions really capture in these perspectives and frameworks.

[1]  N. Pletneva COMMENTARY ON THE INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 31000–2009 “RISK MANAGEMENT. PRINCIPLES AND GUIDELINES” , 2014 .

[2]  R. Schwing,et al.  Interdisciplinary Vision: The First 25 Years of the Society for Risk Analysis (SRA), 1980–2005 , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[3]  T. Aven,et al.  EXPRESSING AND COMMUNICATING UNCERTAINTY IN RELATION TO QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS , 2009 .

[4]  S. Kaplan,et al.  On The Quantitative Definition of Risk , 1981 .

[5]  Terje Aven,et al.  Risk management and governance , 2019, The Science of Risk Analysis.

[6]  Terje Aven,et al.  A risk concept applicable for both probabilistic and non-probabilistic perspectives , 2011 .

[7]  Terje Aven,et al.  On Different Types of Uncertainties in the Context of the Precautionary Principle , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[8]  Terje Aven,et al.  On the ontological status of the concept of risk , 2011 .

[9]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Some considerations on the treatment of uncertainties in risk assessment for practical decision making , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[10]  E. Rosa Metatheoretical foundations for post-normal risk , 1998 .

[11]  Robert L. Winkler,et al.  Uncertainty in probabilistic risk assessment , 1996 .

[12]  M. Elisabeth Paté-Cornell,et al.  Uncertainties in risk analysis: Six levels of treatment , 1996 .

[13]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  A New Approach to Risk Evaluation and Management: Risk‐Based, Precaution‐Based, and Discourse‐Based Strategies 1 , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[14]  Terje Aven,et al.  On the new ISO guide on risk management terminology , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[15]  Terje Aven,et al.  A unified framework for risk and vulnerability analysis covering both safety and security , 2007, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[16]  Terje Aven,et al.  On how to define, understand and describe risk , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[17]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Representation, Propagation, and Decision Issues in Risk Analysis Under Incomplete Probabilistic Information , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[18]  John D. Graham,et al.  Going beyond the single number: Using probabilistic risk assessment to improve risk management , 1996 .

[19]  Subir Ghosh,et al.  Reliability and Risk: A Bayesian Perspective , 2008, Technometrics.

[20]  T. Aven,et al.  On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain , 2009 .

[21]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  The worth of a songbird: ecological economics as a post-normal science , 1994 .

[22]  Terje Aven,et al.  A new perspective on Renn and Klinke's approach to risk evaluation and management , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[23]  Jerome R. Ravetz,et al.  Three Types of Risk Assessment: A Methodological Analysis , 1985 .

[24]  Tarantola Stefano,et al.  Uncertainty in Industrial Practice - A Guide to Quantitative Uncertainty Management , 2008 .

[25]  S. Ferson,et al.  Different methods are needed to propagate ignorance and variability , 1996 .

[26]  G. Apostolakis The concept of probability in safety assessments of technological systems. , 1990, Science.

[27]  Risk management — Vocabulary Management du risque — Vocabulaire , .

[28]  H. D. De Kanter [The philosophy of statistics]. , 1972, Ginecología y Obstetricia de México.

[29]  Ortwin Renn Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World , 2008 .

[30]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .